护理专业学生对人工智能辅助学习体验的Meta整合

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.09.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的在人工智能赋能护理教育的背景下，系统评价学生参与人工智能辅助学习体验的质性研究，为护理教育信息化改革与发展提供参考。方法计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库，检索从建库至2025年1月关于护理学生对人工智能辅助学习体验的质性研究。采用澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健中心质性研究质量评价标准（2016）对文献进行质量评价，并采用汇集性整合方法对结果进行整合。结果共纳入11项研究，提炼出42个主题，归纳形成9个类别，合并为3个整合结果：AI技术赋能下的多元化体验；技术与人文的张力角逐；学生参与AI赋能教学时的多样化需求未被满足。结论护理专业学生对人工智能辅助学习体验呈多元化，AI赋能下的教育有利于提高学习效能，但同时也带来人文与伦理冲击。未来需构建AI辅助教学评价与监督体系，优化教学设计，促进信息技术与教育的有机融合。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 人工智能, 体验, 质性研究, Meta整合

Abstract:

Objective To systematically review qualitative studies on nursing students’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence（AI） in teaching，and to provide insights for the further implementation of AI technology in nursing education. Methods Databases were searched from their inception to January 2025 for qualitative studies on nursing students’ experiences and perceptions of AI in teaching，including Cochrane Library，PubMed，Embase，Web of Science，CNKI，Wanfang，VIP，and CBM. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute（JBI） Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research（2016），and a meta-aggregation approach was used to synthesize the findings. Results A total of 11 studies were included，from which 42 themes were extracted. These themes were categorized into nine categories，and further consolidated into three synthesized findings including diversified experiences empowered by AI technology，the tension between technology and humanistic care，nursing students’ diverse needs remain unmet in AI-enabled teaching environments. Conclusion Nursing students demonstrate diverse experiences and perceptions regarding AI-enabled teaching applications. While AI-enhanced education can improve learning efficacy，it simultaneously leads to humanistic and ethical challenges. Future efforts should be devoted to establish dynamic AI nursing training，evaluation，and supervision systems，while continuously optimizing instructional design to achieve organic integration of technology and education.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Artificial intelligence, Experience, Qualitative research, Meta-synthesis

彭涛, 李玉, 匡芸芸, 赖淋雨, 刘鑫, 何永琴, 张玉梅. 护理专业学生对人工智能辅助学习体验的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(9): 1065-1072.

PENG Tao, LI Yu, KUANG Yunyun, LAI Linyu, LIU Xin, HE Yongqin, ZHANG Yumei. Qualitative studies on nursing students’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence in nursing education：a meta-synthesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2025, 22(9): 1065-1072.

图/表 4

参考文献 23

[1]	曹婧, 杨磊, 李小妹. 人工智能赋能护理教育的实践路径与展望[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(4):389-392.
	Cao J, Yang L, Li XM. Practical pathways and future prospects of AI-powered nursing education[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2025, 22(4):389-392.
[2]	Lifshits I, Rosenberg D. Artificial intelligence in nursing education:a scoping review[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2024,80:104148.
[3]	张山, 刘璐, 吴瑛. 基于知识图谱的人工智能在护理教学中的研究热点与趋势[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2024, 40(30):2365-2371.
[4]	王雅琦, 高洁, 王克芳. 生成式人工智能在护理模拟教学中的潜在应用价值、挑战和展望[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9):1076-1081.
	Wang YQ, Gao J, Wang KF. Potential application value,challenges,and prospects of generative artificial intelligence in nursing simulation education[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2024, 21(9):1076-1081.
[5]	马应卓, 王俊, 刘彤, 等. 大语言模型在护理学领域应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(19):124-129.
	Ma YZ, Wang J, Liu T, et al. A scoping review of the applications of large language models in nursing science[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2024, 39(19):124-129.
[6]	陈红, 喻婷, 许珂, 等. 人工智能在护理专业学生智慧教育中的应用与建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(4):409-415.
	Chen H, Yu T, Xu K, et al. Applications and recommendations of artificial intelligence in the smart education of nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2025, 22(4):409-415.
[7]	孙皓, 时景璞. 循证医学中PICO模型的扩展及其在定性研究中的应用[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 14(5):505-508.
	Sun H, Shi JP. Expansion of PICO model in evidence-based medicine and its application in qualitative research[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2014, 14(5):505-508.
[8]	Institute TJB. Criticl appraisal checklist for qualitative research[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical appraisa-l-tools.html.
[9]	Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K. Qualitative research synthesis:methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation[J]. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2015, 13(3):179-187.
[10]	刘婷, 杨富国, 杨丽, 等. 护理硕士研究生使用人工智能生成内容工具体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9):1046-1051.
	Liu T, Yang FG, Yang L, et al. A descriptive qualitative study on the experience of using artificial intelligence generated content tools among nursing postgraduate students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2024, 21(9):1046-1051.
[11]	马应卓, 王俊, 李雪连, 等. 护生对大语言模型聊天机器人使用体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(16):69-72.
	Ma YZ, Wang J, Li XL, et al. Qualitative study on nursing students’ experience in the use of large language model chatbots[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2024, 39(16):69-72.
[12]	杨智慧, 李兴雯, 闭晓君, 等. 健康评估课程知识图谱的构建及初步应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9):1035-1040.
	Yang ZH, Li XW, Bi XJ, et al. Construction and application of knowledge graph in health assessment course[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2024, 21(9):1035-1040.
[13]	Rodriguez-Arrastia M, Martinez-Ortigosa A, Ruiz-Gonzalez C, et al. Experiences and perceptions of final-year nursing students of using a chatbot in a simulated emergency situation:a qualitative study[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2022, 30(8):3874-3884.
[14]	Chen YY, Lin QR, Chen XH, et al. Need assessment for history-taking instruction program using chatbot for nursing students:a qualitative study using focus group interviews[J]. Digit Health, 2023,9:20552076231185435.
[15]	Reed JM, Dodson TM. Generative AI backstories for simulation preparation[J]. Nurse Educ, 2024, 49(4):184-188.
[16]	Summers A, El Haddad M, Prichard R, et al. Navigating challenges and opportunities:nursing student’s views on generative AI in higher education[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2024,79:104062.
[17]	Kong WJ, Ning YH, Ma T, et al. Experience of undergraduate nursing students participating in artificial intelligence + project task driven learning at different stages:a qualitative study[J]. BMC Nurs, 2024, 23(1):314.
[18]	Hawk H, Coriasco M, Jones JR. Generative artificial intelligence:a reflexive thematic analysis of nursing students’ perceptions following a guided learning activity[J/OL]. Nurse Educ, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39288334/.
[19]	Ma Y, Liu T, Qi J, et al. Facilitators and barriers of large language model adoption among nursing students:a qualitative descriptive study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2025, 81(8):4856-4870.
[20]	Navarro Martínez O, Fernández-García D, Cuartero Monteagudo N, et al. Possible health benefits and risks of DeepFake videos:a qualitative study in nursing students[J]. Nurs Rep, 2024, 14(4):2746-2757.
[21]	苏秦, 王艳波. 人工智能在临床护理领域应用中的伦理困境及对策[J]. 医学与哲学, 2023, 44(24):51-55.
	Su Q, Wang YB. Ethical dilemmas and strategies in the application of artificial intelligence in clinical nursing[J]. Med Philos, 2023, 44(24):51-55.
[22]	罗江华, 王琳, 刘璐. 人工智能赋能课堂反馈的伦理困境及风险化解[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022, 34(2):29-36.
	Luo JH, Wang L, Liu L. AI enabled classroom teaching evaluation:ethical review and risk resolution[J]. Mod Distance Educ Res, 2022, 34(2):29-36.
[23]	Simms RC. Generative artificial intelligence(AI) literacy in nursing education:a crucial call to action[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2025,146:106544.