机器人辅助手术的护士培训方案构建及应用

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.05.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的构建机器人辅助手术（robotic-assisted surgery，RAS）的护士培训方案并探讨其应用效果。方法基于文献回顾法和半结构式访谈法构建RAS的护士培训方案初稿。于2022年2月—4月，运用专家函询法对26名专家进行2轮函询，形成RAS的护士培训方案。采用便利抽样法，将2022年4月—7月在某三级甲等医院接受RAS配合培训的32名手术室护士作为对照组，将2022年8月—11月在该院接受同类培训的32名手术室护士作为试验组。对照组接受常规培训，试验组接受基于RAS的护士培训方案打造的培训，比较两组培训效果。结果 2轮专家函询的问卷有效回收率均为100%；专家权威系数为0.933；肯德尔协调系数分别为0.261、0.312（P<0.001）。最终构建的RAS的护士培训方案由6个模块及其下设的85个条目构成。培训后，试验组理论考核得分、RAS系统无菌罩安装时间、RAS系统内镜校准操作时间、RAS系统入位操作时间、RAS系统入位一次成功率、RAS术前截石位摆放操作考核得分优于对照组（均P<0.05）。结论 RAS的护士培训方案较为科学、可靠，其运用有助于提升护士配合RAS的知识与技能水平，提高培训效果。

关键词: 机器人辅助手术, 手术室, 护士, 在职培训

Abstract:

Objective To develop a training program for nurses to assist in robotic-assisted surgery and explore its application effect. Methods The initial draft of the training program for nurses assisting in robotic-assisted surgery was constructed based on literature review and semi-structured interviews. From February to April 2022，a total of 26 experts were consulted through two rounds of expert consultation to finalize the training program. In application，32 operating room nurses who received training in robotic-assisted surgery cooperation in a tertiary hospital from April to July 2022 were assigned to the control group，while another 32 operating room nurses who received similar training in the same hospital from August to November 2022 were assigned to the experimental group. The control group received routine training，while the experimental group received training based on the training program for nurses assisting in robotic-assisted surgery. The training effects of the two groups were compared afterward. Results The effective recovery rate of the questionnaires for the two rounds of expert consultation was 100%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.933，and the Kendall’s coordination coefficient was 0.261 and 0.312（P<0.001），respectively. The final training program for nurses assisting in robotic-assisted surgery consisted of six modules and 85 sub-items. After the training，the experimental group performed better than the control group in terms of theoretical assessment scores，installation time of the robotic-assisted surgery system’s sterile hood，calibration time for endoscopic operations using the robotic-assisted surgery system，operation time for robotic-assisted surgery system positioning，first-attempt success rate for robotic-assisted surgery system positioning，and assessment scores for preoperative lithotomy position placement using the robotic-assisted surgery system （all P<0.05）. Conclusion The development of the training program for nurses assisting in robotic-assisted surgery is scientific and reliable. In application it is helpful to improve nurses’ knowledge and skills in assisting robotic-assisted surgery and enhance the training effect.

Key words: Robotic-assisted surgery, Operating room, Nurses, Inservice training

白亚爽, 张增梅, 李胜云, 金子, 张淑利. 机器人辅助手术的护士培训方案构建及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 517-524.

BAI Yashuang, ZHANG Zengmei, LI Shengyun, JIN Zi, ZHANG Shuli. Construction and application of a training program for nurses in robotic-assisted surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(5): 517-524.

图/表 4

参考文献 20

[1]	Luck ES, Gillespie BM. Technological advancements in the OR:do we need to redefine intraoperative nursing roles?[J]. AORN J, 2017, 106(4):280-282.
[2]	Møller L, Hertz P, Grande U, et al. Identifying curriculum content for operating room nurses involved in robotic-assisted surgery:a Delphi study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(4):2729-2748.
[3]	沈小芬, 石泽亚, 周毅峰, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术护士基于清单管理的培训[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(8):34-36.
[4]	Uslu Y, Altınba Y, Özercan T, et al. The process of nurse adaptation to robotic surgery:a qualitative study[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2019, 15(4):e1996.
[5]	白亚爽, 张增梅, 魏薇, 等. 我国机器人辅助手术系统的手术室护士培训现状调查[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2022, 38(25):1961-1966.
[6]	Giedelman C, Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, et al. Establishing a successful robotic surgery program and improving operating room efficiency:literature review and our experience report[J]. J Robot Surg, 2021, 15(3):435-442.
[7]	Carlos G, Saulan M. Robotic emergencies:are you prepared for a disaster?[J]. AORN J, 2018, 108(5):493-501. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12393 pmid: 30376165
[8]	王共先, 曾玉, 盛夏, 等. 机器人手术护理学[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 2017.
[9]	郭莉. 手术室护理实践指南:2019年版[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019.
[10]	杨万通, 张秋雯, 穆莉, 等. 护士配合机器人手术体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(16):2003-2009.
[11]	Grozdanovic D, Janackovic GL, Grozdanovic M, et al. The selection of main surgical work factors in operating rooms[J]. Inquiry, 2021,58:469580211067497.
[12]	Sirevåg I, Tjoflåt I, Hansen BS. A Delphi study identifying operating room nurses’ non-technical skills[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(12):4935-4949. doi: 10.1111/jan.15064 pmid: 34626011
[13]	毛琴, 王秀霞, 周红燕, 等. 二级医院提升临床护士护理职业素养的策略与成效[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2017, 17(1):4-6.
[14]	Liu YH, Subeq YM, Lin PH. Clinical dyspnea scenario:using high-fidelity situation simulation teaching program to evaluate learning effectiveness for clinical junior and pre-clinical nurses[J]. Front Psychol, 2022,13:1015106.
[15]	Sonoda Y, Onozuka D, Hagihara A. Factors related to teamwork performance and stress of operating room nurses[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2018, 26(1):66-73.
[16]	张增梅, 王宇, 赵海运, 等. 抛锚式教学联合Gibbs反思循环在手术室专科护士培训中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24):12-15.
[17]	颜红波, 于红静, 关玉仙, 等. 反思日记联合案例法在神经外科低年资护士培训中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(3):94-96.
[18]	彭静, 陈静薇, 欧慧萍, 等. Gibbs反思循环联合情景模拟教学在专培护士中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2022, 14(4):69-73.
[19]	胡娟娟, 高兴莲, 赵晶, 等. 工作坊教学模式在手术室新护士侧卧位安置培训中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(1):9-11.
[20]	王清, 崔丽萍, 李敏, 等. 工作坊在新入职护士规范化培训中的应用效果[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(21):3933-3936.