多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.05.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化多维度护理代际特征问卷（Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire，MNGQ），并检验中文版MNGQ信效度。方法取得源问卷开发者授权后，依据Brislin经典模型对MNGQ进行正译、回译，经跨文化调试、预调查，形成中文版MNGQ。2023年1月—3月，采用便利抽样法，选取来自山东省7所三级甲等综合医院的492名临床护士作为调查对象，采用一般资料调查表、中文版MNGQ对其进行调查，并从中便利抽取30名护士，于其初次接受调查2周后，再次对其进行调查，评价中文版MNGQ的信效度。结果中文版MNGQ由代际冲突、患者安全观、代代关系、多代合作、方向改变和工作倾向6个维度组成，共45个条目；问卷的Cronbach’s α系数为0.943，重测信度系数为0.764；条目水平的内容效度指数为0.80~1.00，量表水平的内容效度指数为0.91。经探索性因子分析提取6个公因子，累计方差贡献率为64.977%。验证性因子分析结果显示， χ²/df=2.552，渐进残差均方和平方根（RMSEA）=0.045，标准化均方根残差（SRMR）=0.046，比较拟合指数（CFI）=0.934，非归准适配指数（TLI）=0.929，递增拟合指数（IFI）=0.934。各维度的平均提取方差值（AVE）均>0.500，各维度的组合信度值均>0.700；各维度AVE的平方根值均大于该维度与其他维度间的相关系数。结论中文版MNGQ具有良好的信效度，可作为评估我国工作场所中不同代护士特征的工具。

关键词: 代际特征, 代际差异, 代际冲突, 护士, 问卷, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire（MNGQ） into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. Methods After obtaining authorization from the original author，the MNGQ got translated and back-translated according to the Brislin classic model. Following cross-cultural adjustments and a pre-survey, the Chinese version of the MNGQ was formed. From January to March 2023, 492 clinical registered nurses from seven tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Shandong Province were selected as research participants through convenience sampling. They were surveyed using a general information questionnaire and the Chinese version of the MNGQ and thirty nurses were invited for retest two weeks after the first survey to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the MNGQ consisted of six dimensions, namely conflicts between generations，patient safety view, relationships issues between generations, multi-generation teamwork, orientation to change and work propensity，with a total of 45 items. The Cronbach’s α coefficient index of the questionnaire was 0.943, and the test-retest reliability was 0.764. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.80 to 1.00，and the scale-level content validity index was 0.91. Exploratory factor analysis extracted six common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 64.977%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit, with indicator of χ²/df=2.552, RMSEA=0.045, SRMR=0.046, CFI=0.934, TLI=0.929, and IFI=0.934. The average variance extracted（AVE） for each dimension was greater than 0.500，and the composite reliability(CR) values for each dimension were greater than 0.700. The square roots of the AVE for each dimension were greater than the correlation coefficients between that dimension and other dimensions. Conclusion The MNGQ exhibits good reliability and validity, which can be deemed as an important tool for understanding the perspectives and beliefs of nurses from different generations in China for assessing their characteristic differences.

Key words: Intergenerational characteristics, Intergenerational differences, Intergenerational conflict, Nurses, Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity

高肖, 魏丽丽, 周海清, 宫慧, 孙亚茹, 谷如婷. 多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 580-586.

GAO Xiao, WEI Lili, ZHOU Haiqing, GONG Hui, SUN Yaru, GU Ruting. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(5): 580-586.

图/表 2

参考文献 13

[1]	陈玉明, 崔勋. 代际差异理论与代际价值观差异的研究评述[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2014(13):43-48.
	Chen YM, Cui X. A review of generational difference theory and generational difference in values[J]. Hum Resour Dev China, 2014(13):43-48.
[2]	孔丹丹. 代际差异视角下工作价值观对离职倾向的影响研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2018.
	Kong DD. Study on the impact of work values on the turnover intention from the perspective of generational difference[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2018.
[3]	姜颖雁. 组织中的代际差异研究综述[J]. 现代管理科学, 2018(2):69-71.
[4]	刘凤香. 工作场所代际差异研究述评及整体模型构建[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2010, 32(1):50-57.
[5]	刘凤香. 工作场所中工作价值观代际差异的产生机制和影响因素研究[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2012, 3(3):20-26.
	Liu FX. Generating mechanism and influence factors of gene-rational differences of work values in workpalce[J]. J Soc Sci Harbin Norm Univ, 2012, 3(3):20-26.
[6]	陈坚, 连榕. 代际工作价值观发展的研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11):1692-1701.
	Chen J, Lian R. A review of the development of generational work value[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2011, 19(11):1692-1701.
[7]	Stevanin S, Bressan V, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, et al. The Mul-tidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire:development,reliability,and validity assessments[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2017, 25(4):287-296.
[8]	Stevanin S, Mikkonen S, Bressan V, et al. Psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire(MNGQ)[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2019, 75(11):3147-3155.
[9]	Stevanin S, Voutilainen A, Bressan V, et al. Nurses’ generational differences related to workplace and leadership in two European countries[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2020, 42(1):14-23.
[10]	Sanner-Stiehr E, Stevanin S, Mikkonen S, et al. Job satisfaction and generational nursing characteristics among registered nurses in the United States,Italy and Finland:results of a survey study[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2021, 29(8):2364-2373.
[11]	Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970, 1(3):185-216.
[12]	史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52.
	Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale development[J]. J Cent South Univ Med Sci, 2012, 37(2):49-52.
[13]	李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.

[1]	黄玉婷, 张慧琳, 朱婧, 邹颖, 覃祖明, 张晓可. 国内护士对死亡的态度现状及影响因素的系统评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 718-724.
[2]	张学颖, 张晓翠, 尹雪梅, 夏欣华, 王莹, 王蓓, 朱红. 危重症新生儿医源性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 731-737.
[3]	孙玉梅, 周强, 叶铭惠, 孙宏玉, 赵国栋. 混合式教学中护理本科生学习方式的调查研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 557-561.
[4]	白亚爽, 张增梅, 李胜云, 金子, 张淑利. 机器人辅助手术的护士培训方案构建及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 517-524.
[5]	邹颖, 徐梦琦, 阮甜甜, 丁原, 朱凌燕. 原位模拟在护士气道管理培训中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 506-512.
[6]	王梅杰, 王琳娜, 郭迎迎, 任云, 李媛媛, 马欢, 陈佳, 宋红霞. 护士参与营养支持专科护士培训后的工作投入现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 449-453.
[7]	王雨晴, 孙绪晗, 张玉玺. 护理人员参与叙事护理体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 466-472.
[8]	周华博, 宋远星, 吴明明, 杨立, 杨佳佳. 低年资护士反思能力在职业态度与业余时间规划间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 461-465.
[9]	李岩, 周晶, 徐洪娇, 樊玉霞, 李娜, 刘美红, 蔺晶. 精神科治疗性关系评估量表-护士版的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 473-477.
[10]	谢雨青, 张先庚, 王玉婷, 王红艳, 杨申碧, 郭勤. 四川省民族地区育龄期女性社会支持对其生活质量的影响研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(3): 348-352.
[11]	张建, 井杰, 盖玉彪, 薛雪, 刘庆伟, 魏丽丽, 张宇辰, 李尊柱, 孙建华, 刘艳妍, 罗红波. ICU护士急性皮肤衰竭护理知信行现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(3): 336-341.
[12]	吴捷, 李梦瑶, 闫德修, 章雅青, 张媛媛. 新入职护士基本理论知识培训慕课的开发及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 140-144.
[13]	张岩, 秦元梅, 刘姝, 杨艳明, 钟远, 邹小燕. 中医医院新入职本科护士培训考核评价指标的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 145-151.
[14]	刘佳惠, 李金花, 李旭英, 陈婕君, 李星凤, 王婧, 胡美华. 肿瘤专科医院新入职护士培训目标清单的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 152-158.
[15]	张帆, 刘团会, 徐兆宁, 吕静雯, 张蕾, 李亚红, 蒋文慧. 自我复原力在新入职护士知觉压力与职业承诺间的调节效应分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 159-164.