巴林特小组活动提升护士人文关怀能力的效果研究

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.03.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探究巴林特小组活动提升护士人文关怀能力的效果。方法通过自主报名方式招募91名护士参加人文关怀能力培训,采用抽签法将其随机分为对照组55名和试验组36名。对照组参加6次医院组织的人文关怀主题讲座,持续1年时间;试验组在对照组的基础上每季度增加1次巴林特小组活动。比较两组培训前、培训半年和培训1年后的人文关怀能力、共情能力和情绪智力。结果关怀能力量表、Jefferson共情量表及情绪智力量表得分组间与时间均存在交互效应（F_交互=26.403、88.817、90.085,均P<0.001）,简单效应分析显示,试验组培训半年和培训1年后的关怀能力量表、Jefferson共情量表及情绪智力量表得分均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论巴林特小组活动能够有效提升护士的人文关怀能力、共情能力及情绪智力。

关键词: 护士, 人文关怀, 巴林特小组

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of Balint group on improving nurses’ humanistic care ability. Methods A total of 91 nurses were recruited to participate in the training of humanistic care ability. They were randomly divided into the control group（55 cases）and the experimental group（36 cases）by drawing lots. Nurses in the control group participated in six lectures organized by the hospital for one year. Nurses in the experimental group received Balint group activities once a quarter besides the regular lectures. The humanistic care ability,empathy ability and emotional intelligence of the two groups before the training,the training for half one year and the training for one year were compared. Results The scores of Caring Ability Scale,Jefferson Empathy Scale and Emotional Intelligence Scale had interaction effects between groups and time（F_interaction=26.403,88.817,90.085,all P<0.001）. The simple effect analysis showed that the scores of Caring Ability Scale,Jefferson Empathy Scale and Emotional Intelligence Scale of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group of the training for half one year and one year（P<0.05）。Conclusion Balint group activities can effectively improve nurses’ humanistic care ability,empathy ability and emtional intelligence.

Key words: Nurses, Humanistic care, Balint group

胡新宇,刘秀红,邢彩霞,方芳,熊玫,陈锡珊,胡甘露. 巴林特小组活动提升护士人文关怀能力的效果研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(3): 240-243.

HU Xin-yu,LIU Xiu-hong,XING Cai-xia,FANG Fang,XIONG Mei,CHEN Xi-shan,HU Gan-lu. The effects of Balint group on improving humanistic care ability of nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(3): 240-243.

图/表 3

参考文献 11

[1]	Jha A, Epstein A. Hospital governance and the quality of care[J]. Health Affairs, 2009,29(1):182-187. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0297 pmid: 19897509
[2]	D’Agostino MA, Terslev L, Wakefield R, et al. Novel algorithms for the pragmatic use of ultrasound in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis:from diagnosis to remission[J]. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2016,75(11):1902-1908. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209646 pmid: 27553213
[3]	Balint E. The Balint group approach[J]. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1979,72(6):469-471. pmid: 552540
[4]	伊静, 董建俐, 沙丽艳, 等. 巴林特小组活动后护士工作体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018,25(9):71-74.
	Yi J, Dong JL, Sha LY, et al. Qualitative research on work experience of nurses trained by the mode of balint groups[J]. J Nurs(China), 2018,25(9):71-74.
[5]	许娟. 医院护士关怀能力调查研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2008.
	Xu J. Investigation on caring ability of hospital nurses[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008.
[6]	安秀琴, 杨辉, 徐建萍, 等. 杰弗逊共情量表的编译及评价[J]. 护理研究, 2008,22(22):2063-2064,2066.
	An XQ, Yang H, Xu JP, et al. Compilation and evaluation of Jefferson Empathy Scale[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2008,22(22):2063-2064,2066.
[7]	王才康. 情绪智力与大学生焦虑、抑郁和心境的关系研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2002,10(4):298-299.
	Wang CK. The relationship between emotional intelligence and anxiety,depression and mood in a sample of college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2002,10(4):298-299.
[8]	国家卫计委. 全国护理事业发展规划(2016-2020年)[EB/OL].(2016-11-18). https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/fzzlgh/gjjzxgh/201707/t20170720_1196854.html.
[9]	胡媞, 刘逸文. 巴林特小组在重症监护病房护理工作中的应用[J]. 华西医学, 2017,32(4):593-595.
	Hu T, Liu YW. Application of Balint group in nursing work in intensive care unit[J]. West China Med J, 2017,32(4):593-595.
[10]	代艺, 闻曲, 郭潇. 应用巴林特小组训练模式提高实习护生护理人文关怀能力[J]. 护理研究, 2017,31(16):2014-2016.
	Dai Y, Wen Q, Guo X. Application of Balint group training model for improving humanistic care ability of practical nursing students[J]. Nurs Res China, 2017,31(16):2014-2016.
[11]	董建俐, 沙丽艳, 伊静, 等. 巴林特小组培训提升护士情绪智力及沟通能力的作用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016,31(21):73-75.
	Dong JL, Sha LY, Yi J, et al. The role of Balint groups training in improving nurses’ emotional intelligence and communication ability[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016,31(21):73-75.

[1]	闫德修, 包玲, 章雅青. 工作控制在变革型领导和护士创新行为间的中介作用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 849-854.
[2]	王滢茹, 周乐山. 护理本科生人文关怀能力与关怀氛围的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 819-822.
[3]	侯梦晓,王飞杰,黄丽洁,越丽霞,赵天云,王志霞. 护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 840-843.
[4]	瞿田星. 手术室护士掌握达芬奇机器人基础操作技能的学习曲线[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 681-685.
[5]	贾立红,孙晓红,殷涵,潘宗极. 新入职护士叙事护理知识-态度-行为的调查研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 732-735.
[6]	宫慧,魏丽丽,王静远,张艳,李雯,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣. 儿科护士与患儿父母伙伴关系量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 638-643.
[7]	李野,徐秀琴,田亚娟,唐玲. 北京市中医医院新入职护士培训师资管理指标体系的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 592-595.
[8]	李真,郭娜,霍晓鹏,焦静,吴欣娟. 近10年新入职护士研究现状与热点分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 606-612.
[9]	杨丽黎,王锦云,边莉,李超倩,刘素香,竺赛丽,黄小娇. 新入职护士通用业务知识课程执行大纲的设计与应用效果[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 596-599.
[10]	冯兰棱,樊落,李琳,李丹,王雪. 我国新入职护士培训真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 600-605.
[11]	田朴,周乐山,金梦,黄玉婷,黄亚芹. 新生儿重症监护室护士对家庭参与式护理的认知及态度的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(6): 568-571.
[12]	杨艳林,吕琳,耿晨,王宁,苗丽珍,韩琳. 美国伤口造口失禁专科护士资格认证现状及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(6): 572-576.
[13]	马瑞珩,黄馨瑶,佟春雨,李雪玉. 突发公共卫生事件应急救援中先遣护理人员核心胜任力评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(6): 485-489.
[14]	田茜,孙敏. 工作形塑在新入职护士双元工作压力与隐性缺勤间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(6): 539-543.
[15]	黄瑞英,王静,徐晓霞,白桂芳. 新入职护士逆境商培养方案的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(5): 452-455.