团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校在高龄初产妇健康教育中的应用

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.09.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校在高龄初产妇健康教育中的应用效果。方法选取2019年1月—11月泉州市某三级甲等综合医院产科门诊首次建卡的高龄初产妇120例,随机分为试验组（n=60）和对照组（n=60）,试验组采用团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校模式;对照组采用传统产前保健管理模式。比较两组高龄初产妇在干预前后的妊娠压力、分娩自我效能和顺产率的差异。结果干预后试验组妊娠压力低于对照组（P<0.05）,分娩自我效能及顺产率均高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校健康教育模式可降低高龄初产妇的妊娠压力,提高分娩自我效能及顺产率。

关键词: 健康教育, 产前保健, 高龄初产妇, 妊娠压力, 分娩自我效能

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of group prenatal care combined with pregnant women school on health education of high-aged primiparous women. Methods A total of 120 high-aged primiparous women who were first registered in the obstetrics clinic of our hospital from January to November 2019 were randomly divided into the experimental group（n=60）and the control group（n=60）. Women in the experimental group received a new model of group prenatal care with pregnant women school,while women in the control group received the traditional prenatal care. The pregnancy pressure,delivery self-efficacy and delivery rate between the two groups were compared after 6 months of interventions. Results The pregnancy pressure in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group（P<0.05）.The self-efficacy and natural birth rate were higher than those of the control group（P<0.05）. Conclusion The group prenatal care combined with pregnant women school for high-aged primi-parous women can reduce the pressure of pregnancy,improve the self-efficacy of delivery and the rate of delivery.

Key words: Health Education, Prenatal Care, Elderly primipara, Pregnancy stress, Birth self-efficacy

戴亚端,林丽媛,郭进华,林金凤. 团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校在高龄初产妇健康教育中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9): 803-808.

DAI Ya-duan,LIN Li-yuan,GUO Jin-hua,LIN Jin-feng. Application of the group prenatal care combined with pregnant women school for high-aged primiparous women[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2020, 17(9): 803-808.

图/表 3

参考文献 21

[1]	何逸雯, 蔺莉. 高龄孕妇分娩方式评估[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017,33(1):8-10.
[2]	Giri A, Srivastav VR, Suwal A, et al. Advanced maternal age and obstetric outcome[J]. Nepal Med Coll J, 2013,15(2):87-90. pmid: 24696922
[3]	Matinnia N, Faisal I, Hanafiah JM, et al. Fears related to pregnancy and childbirth among primigravidae who requested caesarean versus vaginal delivery in Iran[J]. Matern Child Health J, 2015,19(5):1121-1130. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1610-0 pmid: 25269852
[4]	张雪, 刘凯波, 刘凤杰, 等. 北京市不同年龄段孕妇妊娠期临床特点及妊娠结局的分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2018,53(7):452-458.
[5]	孙曼, 侯晨颖, 何雪敬, 等. 妊娠压力和社会支持对妊娠晚期孕妇分娩自我效能感的影响[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2019,36(1):60-63.
[6]	Tsai YJ, Hsu YY, Hou TW, et al. Effects of a web-based antenatal care system on maternal stress and self-efficacy during pregnancy:a study in Taiwan[J]. J Midwifery Womens Health, 2018,63(2):205-213. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12685 pmid: 29533525
[7]	Kızılırmak A, Başer M. The effect of education given to primigravida women on fear of childbirth[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2016,29:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.04.002 pmid: 26856483
[8]	ACOG committee opinion No. 731:group prenatal care[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018,131(3):e104-e108. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002529 pmid: 29470344
[9]	DeCesare JZ, Jackson JR. Centering pregnancy:practical tips for your practice[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015,291(3):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3467-2 pmid: 25315379
[10]	潘旋, 张晶, 张邢炜. 国外集中群组孕期保健模式的应用研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016,51(8):988-991.
[11]	潘颖丽, 王洪娟, 胡敏. 孕妇心理压力调查分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2003,18(12):891-893.
[12]	Lowe NK. Maternal confidence for labor:development of the childbirth self-efficacy inventory[J]. Res Nurs Health, 1993,16(2):141-149. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770160209 pmid: 8502766
[13]	Ip WY, Chung TK, Tang CS. The Chinese childbirth self-efficacy inventory:the development of a short form[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2008,17(3):333-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01919.x pmid: 17850293
[14]	Gao LL, Ip WY, Sun K. Validation of the short form of the Chinese childbirth self-efficacy inventory in mainland China[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2011,34(1):49-59. doi: 10.1002/nur.20400
[15]	袁春蕾, 刘燕群, 刘光华, 等. 集中群组孕期健康教育对孕妇分娩恐惧的干预效果[J]. 护理学杂志, 2017,32(18):27-29.
[16]	牛林艳, 黄金. 同伴教育在糖尿病健康教育中的应用现状[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(1):79-82.
[17]	Karabulut Ö, Coşkuner Potur D, Doğan Merih Y, et al. Does antenatal education reduce fear of childbirth?[J]. Int Nurs Rev, 2016,63(1):60-67. doi: 10.1111/inr.12223 pmid: 26612181
[18]	尹航, 陈志红, 张利卷, 等. 自我效能感在妊娠压力和产前抑郁关系中的中介效应[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2017,34(1):21-24.
[19]	杨雯茜, 王龙琼, 安晓惠, 等. 以助产士为主导的孕晚期综合干预对孕产妇自我效能及分娩结局的影响[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2016,33(13):24-27.
[20]	顾春怡, 林启萍, 朱春香, 等. 孕妇分娩方式决策及相关因素研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017,33(22):1757-1760.
[21]	陈丹丹, 李益民, 周临. 助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健服务的实践[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018,33(22):7-10.