费曼学习法联合思维导图在糖尿病慢性并发症护理临床教学中的应用

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.04.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨费曼学习法联合思维导图在糖尿病慢性并发症护理临床教学中的应用效果。方法选取2021年 9月—2022年4月实习的护理专业学生为研究对象，按照实习时间的前后顺序分为试验组（n=31）和对照组（n=34），试验组采用费曼学习法联合思维导图进行教学，对照组采用传统教学法教学。比较教学前后两组学生的理论考核成绩和自主学习能力，调查试验组对课程的评价。结果教学后试验组成绩（73.39±9.02）高于对照组（58.79±5.03）（t=7.952，P<0.001）。教学后，试验组自主学习能力得分（118.16±5.89）高于对照组（109.53±7.55），差异具有统计学意义（t=5.105，P<0.001）。26名试验组学生对课程总体效果满意。结论在糖尿病慢性并发症护理教学中采用费曼学习法联合思维导图，有助于提升学生的自主学习能力，提高教学效果和满意度。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 临床实习, 糖尿病并发症, 思维导图, 费曼学习法

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of Feynman learning method combined with mind mapping in clinical nursing teaching of diabetes chronic complications. Methods Nursing students who practiced from September 2021 to April 2022 were divided into experimental group（n=31） and control group（n=34） in chronological order. The experimental group was taught by Feynman learning method combined with mind mapping and the control group was taught by the traditional teaching method. Theory examination and self-learning ability of the two groups were compared. Besides，students’ evaluation in the experimental group on the course was collected. Results After teaching，the total examination score of students in the experimental group（73.39±9.02） was higher than that of the control group（58.79±5.03）（t=7.952，P<0.001）. The score of independent learning ability in the experimental group（118.16±5.89） was higher than that in the control group（109.53±7.55）（t=5.105，P<0.001）. Totally 26 students in the experimental group were satisfied with the overall effect of the course. Conclusion The application of Feynman learning method combined with mind mapping in clinical nursing teaching of diabetes chronic complications can improve students’ independent learning abilities，enhance the teaching effect and satisfaction.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Clinical Clerkship, Diabetes Complications, Mind mapping, Feynman learning method

郝莉, 郑鑫, 王鹏, 王盼盼, 袁媛. 费曼学习法联合思维导图在糖尿病慢性并发症护理临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 451-456.

HAO Li, ZHENG Xin, WANG Peng, WANG Panpan, YUAN Yuan. The application of Feynman learning method combined with mind mapping in clinical nursing teaching of diabetes chronic complications[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(4): 451-456.

图/表 2

参考文献 11

[1]	毕艳. 中国糖尿病慢性并发症的流行病学研究现况[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2015, 7(8):467-469.
	Bi Y. Epidemiological study on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus in China[J]. Chin J Diabetes, 2015, 7(8):467-469.
[2]	王珏. “费曼学习法”教学原理分析及应用[J]. 广西职业技术学院学报, 2020, 13(4):98-102,115.
	Wang J. Analysis and application of the teaching principle of Feynman technique[J]. J Guangxi Vocat Tech Coll, 2020, 13(4):98-102,115.
[3]	理查德·费曼. 别闹了, 费曼先生[M]. 上海: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2005.
[4]	Acland CR. American AV:Edgar dale and the information age classroom[J]. Technol Cult, 2017, 58(2):392-421. doi: 10.1353/tech.2017.0041
[5]	李雪, 龚文姜, 杨杰, 等. 费曼式学习法对提高居家腹膜透析患者的自我管理依从性及透析充分性的影响[J]. 中国血液净化, 2021, 20(2):134-137.
	Li X, Gong WJ, Yang J, et al. Effects of Feynman learning method on self-management compliance and dialysis adequacy in patients performing peritoneal dialysis at home[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2021, 20(2):134-137.
[6]	张喜琰. 护理专业学生自主学习能力测评工具的研制及现状调查[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2007.
	Zhang XY. Study on the ability of self-regulated learning in nursing undergraduates:measuring instrument and investigation[D]. Shenyang: China Medical University, 2007.
[7]	王青. 小班教学与翻转课堂:《费曼物理学Ⅱ》的10年教学实践—纪念费曼先生百年诞辰[J]. 物理与工程, 2018, 28(4):20-38.
	Wang Q. Small group teaching and flipped classroom:《Feynman physics Ⅱ》ten year’s teaching experiment—to commemorate the centenary of the birth of Richard Phillips Feynman[J]. Phys Eng, 2018, 28(4):20-38.
[8]	石银盛, 潘海燕. 思维导图在胸腔负压吸引护理临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2016, 13(9):679-682.
	Shi YS, Pan HY. Application of mind map in clinical teaching of closed thoracic drainage with suction for nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2016, 13(9):679-682.
[9]	Booker SQ, Peterson N. Use of the knowledge tree as a mind map in a gerontological course for undergraduate nursing students[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2016, 55(3):182-184. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20160216-13 pmid: 26926222
[10]	王丹, 沈翠珍, 余亮. 思维导图在高职急危重症护理学课程教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2018, 15(4):275-278.
	Wang D, Shen CZ, Yu L. The application of mind mapping in the course of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing among higher vocational nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2018, 15(4):275-278.
[11]	李玉丽, 王克芳, 邹凌燕, 等. 混合式学习在护理学基础理论课程中的实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(11):1006-1009.
	Li YL, Wang KF, Zou LY, et al. An exploration of blended learning model for Fundamentals of Nursing[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(11):1006-1009.

[1]	李夕然, 吴晓芬, 苏婷, 梁津, 王丽洁, 王宁. 养老机构长期护理信息系统最小数据集的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 403-408.
[2]	林丹, 戎有和, 孙蓉, 柏亚妹, 张艺雄, 潘娅岚. 基于动机理论的老年人气道异物梗阻救护虚拟仿真实验教学设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 415-420.
[3]	胡必梅, 索宜美, 罗文平. 高职护理专业学生临床思维训练平台的建设及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 421-425.
[4]	黄丹. 我国护理教育信息化研究文献计量学分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 426-429.
[5]	杨冬菊, 李子锋, 李方芳, 彭家芹, 席祖洋. 信息化风险清单在护理实习生临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 430-434.
[6]	黄宇星, 李妍, 刘宁, 石娅林, 黄羽. 护理专业本科生递进式创新创业课程体系的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 389-394.
[7]	王立艳, 黄霞, 卢晓虹, 贾培培, 王斌, 曹丽华. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者结构化教育方案的构建及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 395-402.
[8]	陈羽保, 廖艳芳, 付雪连, 曾春艳, 邓水平. 劳动教育视域下高职涉老专业学生专业性社会实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 435-438.
[9]	胡高波, 陈月卿, 饶和平. 高等护理职业教育国家规划教材立项数据信息外部特征分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 439-444.
[10]	陈玲, 张栋栋, 史玉华, 高枫, 郝伶. 高职院校老年护理人才培养路径的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 445-450.
[11]	杜丽霞, 张艳, 臧舒婷, 韩旭, 任莹. 基于案例库的新入职护士危急症护理培训方案构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 457-461.
[12]	卢贤英, 侯朝铭, 高静, 柏丁兮, 刘锐芮, 陈婷婷. 非药物干预对维持性血液透析患者疲乏影响的网状Meta分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 467-473.
[13]	王琦, 赵培, 张红梅, 郭员志. 乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗依从性常见问题及改善策略的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 372-376.
[14]	蒋梦蝶, 王梦莹, 张俊梅, 常陆. 癫痫患者疾病恐惧感的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 377-380.
[15]	赵博伦, 霍苗. 护理专业课程思政教学实践的现状[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 368-371.