ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   中文科技期刊数据库

中华护理教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (11): 994-997.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.11.007

• 院校教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

混合式教学在护理本科生思维与沟通课程中的应用

张万鸾(),周利华()   

  1. 230032 合肥市 安徽医科大学护理学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-18 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 周利华
  • 作者简介:张万鸾:女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:2535416587@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家级一流本科课程(2020-370);安徽医科大学护理学院青苗培育计划(hlqm2021008);安徽医科大学护理学院青苗培育计划(hlqm2021010)

The application of the blended teaching in the Thinking and Communication course for nursing undergraduates

ZHANG Wanluan(),ZHOU Lihua()   

  • Received:2022-03-18 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-11-18
  • Contact: Lihua ZHOU

摘要:

目的 探讨混合式教学在护理本科生思维与沟通课程中的应用效果。 方法 2021年10月—2022年1月,在2019级护理本科生中通过掷硬币的方法将2个班设为试验组(n=169)和对照组(n=168)。试验组采用线上和线下相结合的混合式教学,对照组采用以面对面讲授为主的传统教学。课程结束后应用中文版文化能力评估量表和理论考试进行效果评价。 结果 教学前,试验组与对照组学生文化能力得分分别为(65.89±5.23)分、(65.65±5.30)分,差异无统计学意义(t=0.427,P=0.670)。教学后,试验组和对照组学生文化能力得分分别为(71.91±8.49)分、(68.73±7.71)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.597,P<0.001)。试验组理论考试成绩(91.64±5.21)分高于对照组(88.44±7.85)分(t=4.402,P<0.001)。 结论 在本科思维与沟通课程中采用混合式教学有助于提升课程教学效果,加强学生对知识的掌握程度。

关键词: 教育,护理, 学生,护理, 教学方法, 文化能力, 混合式教学

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of the blended teaching in Thinking and Communication course on the cultural competence of nursing undergraduates. Methods From October 2021 to January 2022,two classes were assigned to the experimental group(n=169) and the control group(n=168) by tossing a coin. The blended teaching that combined online and traditional classrooms teaching was applied in the experimental group,while the routine teaching method was applied in the control group. The Chinese version Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence among Health care Professionals(IAPCC-CV) and theoretical examination were used to evaluate the effects. Results Before the course,the cultural competence scores of the experimental group and the control group were(65.89±5.23) and(65.65±5.30) respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(t=0.427,P=0.670). After the course,the cultural ability scores of the experimental group and the control group were(71.91±8.49) and(68.73±7.71) respectively(t=3.597,P<0.001). The theoretical scores of the experimental group(91.64±5.21)were higher than those of the control group(88.44±7.85)(t=4.407,P<0.001). Conclusion The blended teaching in Thinking and Communication course can improve the teaching effects and strengthen the students’ mastery of knowledge.

Key words: Education,Nursing, Students,Nursing, Teaching Methods, Cultural competence, Blended teaching