卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况评估量表的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.04.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况评估（The Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home after Stroke，PATH-s）量表并进行信效度检验。方法根据Brislin回译模型将PATH-s量表翻译成中文，并选取30名卒中患者的家庭照顾者进行预试验，邀请8名专家进行内容效度检验，采用便利抽样法对140名卒中患者照顾者进行问卷调查，并检验量表的信效度。结果中文版PATH-s量表包括8个维度，共25个条目，量表层面的内容效度为0.96，条目水平的内容效度为0.90~1.00；与照顾者准备度量表相容效度为0.760；探索性因子分析共提取出8个公因子，累积方差贡献率为73.568%；量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.846。结论中文版PATH-s量表具备良好的信度和效度，科学性和可靠性较好，可用于评估我国卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况。

关键词: 卒中, 家庭照顾者, 准备度, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the scale of Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home after Stroke （PATH-s） into Chinese，and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods According to the Brislin translation model，PATH-s was translated into Chinese. A total of eight experts were invited to assess the content validity，and 30 family caregivers of stroke patients were selected for the preliminary test. After that，convenience sampling was employed to recruit 140 participants for the test of its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese PATH-s instrument consisted of eight factors and 25 items. The content validity of the total questionnaire（S-CVI） was 0.96，and ranged from 0.90 to 1.00 for each item（I-CVI）. The Caregiver Preparedness Scale and Chinese version of the PATH-s was significantly positive related（r=0.760）. According to the results of exploratory factor analysis，the cumulative variance contribution rate of the eight dimensions reached 73.568%. The overall Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.846. Conclusion The Chinese version of PATH-s owns satisfied reliability and validity and could be deemed as a scientific and reliable instrument that can be used to evaluate the transition preparation of caregivers for stroke patients.

Key words: Stroke, Family caregiver, Preparedness, Reliability, Validity

张萌, 余立平, 孟宪梅. 卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 474-479.

ZHANG Meng, YU Liping, MENG Xianmei. Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home after Stroke（PATH-s） Instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(4): 474-479.

图/表 1

参考文献 15

[1]	《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2020, 17(5):272-281.
[2]	王拥军, 王春雪, 缪中荣. 中国缺血性脑卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作二级预防指南2014[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(4):258-273.
[3]	Lin S, Xiao LD, Chamberlain D. A nurse-led health coaching intervention for stroke survivors and their family caregivers in hospital to home transition care in Chongqing,China:a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2020, 21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4156-z
[4]	Camicia M, Lutz BJ, Harvath TA, et al. Using the preparedness assessment for the transition home after stroke instrument to identify stroke caregiver concerns predischarge:uncertainty,anticipation,and cues to action[J]. Rehabil Nurs, 2021, 46(1):33-42. doi: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000267
[5]	Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, et al. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain[J]. Res Nurs Health, 1990, 13(6):375-384. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130605 pmid: 2270302
[6]	刘延锦, 王敏, 董小方. 中文版照顾者准备度量表的信效度研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2016, 32(14):1045-1048.
[7]	Camicia M, Lutz BJ, Harvath T, et al. Development of an instrument to assess stroke caregivers’ readiness for the transition home[J]. Rehabil Nurs, 2020, 45(5):287-298. doi: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000204
[8]	Camicia M, Lutz BJ, Joseph JG, et al. Psychometric properties of the preparedness assessment for the transition home after stroke instrument[J]. Rehabil Nurs, 2021, 46(2):113-121. doi: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000310 pmid: 33492067
[9]	臧渝梨, 刘文, 娄凤兰. 护理测量工具翻译技术方法介绍[J]. 中华护理教育, 2009, 6(6):275-277.
	Zang YL, Liu W, Lou FL. Translation technology of nursing measuring instrument[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2009, 6(6):275-277.
[10]	Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation,adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and user-friendly guideline[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(2):268-274. doi: 10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-2
[11]	Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, et al. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires[J]. Qual Life Res, 2015, 24(1):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2 pmid: 25008261
[12]	Tinsley HEA, Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research[J]. J Couns Psychol, 1987, 34(4):414-424. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414
[13]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[14]	胡雁, 王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[15]	Camicia ME. The Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home after Stroke(PATH-s) Instrument[M]. Davis: University of California, 2018.