ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus

中华护理教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 436-441.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.04.009

• 思政教育与素质教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理本科生科学素养与创新思维启蒙课程设计与教学实践研究

李学靖(),王乐彤,李小花,周芬,孟美琪,杨丹,郭红,郝玉芳()   

  1. 102488 北京市 北京中医药大学
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-01 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 郝玉芳,博士,教授,E-mail:bucmnursing@163.com
  • 作者简介:李学靖,女,博士,讲师,E-mail:hbbdlixuejing@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京中医药大学“揭榜挂帅”教改项目(JX-JBGS-2401003)

The research on the course design and teaching practice of Scientific Literacy and Innovative Thinking Enlightenment for nursing undergraduates

LI Xuejing(),WANG Yuetong,LI Xiaohua,ZHOU Fen,MENG Meiqi,YANG Dan,GUO Hong,HAO Yufang()   

  • Received:2024-08-01 Online:2025-04-15 Published:2025-04-16

摘要:

目的 构建以项目为导向的创新能力培养课程并进行效果评价,提升护理本科生创新能力。方法 采用文献研究和专家会议法(10名专家)对科学素养与创新思维启蒙课程进行设计。课程为专业核心课程,共计9次课,18个学时。2021级、2022级和2023级共963名学生学习了该课程,通过学生课程成绩、学生评教、创新能力问卷调查和半结构式访谈,探索其课程成效和体验建议。结果 2023级学生的总均分为(86.14±5.68)分、评教得分为98.98分,2021级学生总均分(84.51±5.46)分;评教得分为97.54分。评教参评率逐年提升,由2021级92%提升至2023级97%。访谈结果分析形成3个主题:促进学生认知能力的提升;提高学生综合实践能力;促进学生专业认同。结论 基于循证护理思维的四模块递进式创新课程能有助于提升护理学生的创新能力,增强其专业认同感。建议在低年级开设创新类课程,并建立完整的支持体系。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 学士, 课程改革, 创新能力, 混合研究

Abstract:

Objective To develop an evidence-based nursing thinking-oriented innovation training course and evaluate its effectiveness to enhance the innovation abilities of undergraduate nursing students.Methods A literature review and expert panel method(involving 10 experts) were used to design the Scientific Literacy and Innovation Thinking Enlightenment course. This core course consisted of nine sessions,totaling 18 class hours,and was taught to 963 students from the 2021,2022,and 2023 cohorts. The course outcomes and student experiences were explored through course grades,student performance evaluations,innovation ability questionnaires,and semi-structured interviews.Results The total score(86.14±5.68) and the evaluation score(98.98) of the 2023 cohort were higher than those of the 2021 cohort(84.51±5.46;97.54). The participation rate in course evaluations increased annually(from 92% in 2021 to 97% in 2023). Qualitative analysis identified three themes:enhancement of students’ cognitive abilities,improvement of comprehensive practical skills,and strengthening of professional identity.Conclusion The evidence-based nursing-driven,four-module progressive innovation course effectively enhances the innovation abilities of nursing students and boosts their professional identity. It is recommended that the innovative course be introduced earlier in lower academic years and that a comprehensive support system be established.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Course reform, Innovation capability, Mixed-methods research