ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus

中华护理教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (10): 1169-1174.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.10.003

• 专题策划——护理学二级学科建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于团体标准分析的护理学二级学科建设思考

李仪嘉(), 汪秋伊, 许嘉乐, 张智霖, 周兰姝()   

  1. 200433 上海市 海军军医大学护理系/老年长期照护教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-11 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 周兰姝,博士,教授,E-mail:zhoulanshu@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:李仪嘉,女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:2394644624@qq.com

Thoughts on the development of secondary nursing disciplines based on group standards analysis

LI Yijia(), WANG Qiuyi, XU Jiale, ZHANG Zhilin, ZHOU Lanshu()   

  • Received:2025-07-11 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-16

摘要:

目的 分析我国护理学会发布的团体标准,为优化护理二级学科建设提供参考。 方法 在全国团体标准信息平台上检索各级护理学会发布的团体标准,检索时限为建库至2025年5月31日。借助Excel软件对团体标准的关键信息进行提取汇总,运用Rost CM6软件绘制团体标准的社会网络分析图,并按照护理学8个二级学科对团体标准进行分类。 结果 共检索到团体标准142项,经筛选,最终纳入140项。技术操作是团体标准内涵的重要组成部分,从基础护理操作到专科护理技术,都建立了系统化的标准体系。140项团体标准中,59项(42.1%)属于成人与老年护理学范畴、30项(21.4%)属于健康与慢病管理学范畴、20项(14.3%)属于急危重症与灾害护理学范畴、9项(6.4%)属于母婴与儿童护理学范畴、7项(5.0%)属于中医护理学范畴、11项(7.9%)属于护理人文社会学范畴、4项(2.9%)属于精神心理健康护理学范畴、0项属于交叉护理学范畴。 结论 从团体标准分布来看,护理二级学科发展的均衡性不足,未来应加强弱势领域的建设,同时护理学二级学科建设的唯一性原则有待加强。

关键词: 团体标准, 护理学, 二级学科, 建设

Abstract:

Objective To analysis the group standards issued by Chinese nursing associations,and provide references for optimizing the construction of secondary nursing disciplines. Methods The group standards issued by nursing associations at all levels were retrieved on the National Group Standard Information Platform from the establishment of the database to May 31,2025. Excel software was used to extract and summarize the key information of the group standards,and Rost CM6 software was used to draw the social network analysis diagram of the group standards. The group standards were classified according to the eight secondary disciplines of nursing. Results A total of 142 group standards were retrieved,and 140 were finally included after screening. Technical operation was an important part of the connotation of group standards,and a systematic standard system had been established from basic nursing operations to specialized nursing technologies. Among the 140 group standards,there were 59 items(42.1%) belonged to adult and geriatric nursing,30 items(21.4%) in health and chronic disease management,20 items(14.3%) belonged to critical care and disaster nursing,9 items(6.4%)in maternal and child nursing,7 items(5.0%) belonged to traditional Chinese medicine nursing,11 items(7.9%) belonged to nursing humanities and social sciences,4 items(2.9%) were in mental health nursing,and none were in interdisciplinary nursing. Conclusion The development of secondary nursing disciplines is insufficient in balance. In the future,efforts should be made to strengthen the construction of weak fields,and the boundaries of the classification system for secondary nursing disciplines require further clarification.

Key words: Group standards, Nursing science, Secondary discipline, Construction