儿科护士与患儿父母伙伴关系量表的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.07.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化儿科护士与患儿父母伙伴关系量表(Pediatric Nurse Parent Partnership Scale,PNPPS),并对其进行信效度检验。方法获取原量表作者授权后,依据Brislin模型对PNPPS量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适,形成中文版量表。采用便利抽样方法选取青岛市3所三级甲等医院的186名儿科护士和188名住院患儿父母进行问卷调查,评估量表的信效度。结果儿科护士版和患儿父母版量表的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.961和0.964,重测信度分别为0.971和0.932,内容效度分别为0.954、0.943。儿科护士版和患儿父母版量表经探索性因子分析均提取7个公因子,累计方差贡献率分别为72.10%、73.51%。结论中文版PNPPS量表具有良好的信效度,可用于评估我国儿科护士与患儿父母之间伙伴关系状况。

关键词: 医院,儿科, 护士, 儿童,住院, 伙伴关系, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Pediatric Nurse Parent Partnership Scale (PNPPS) into Chinese,and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods After obtaining the authorization of the author of the source scale,the PNPPS was translated,back-translated and cross-cultural adjusted according to the Brislin model to form a Chinese version. A total of 186 pediatric nurses and 188 parents of hospitalized children from three tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Qingdao were investigated to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Cronbach’s α coefficients of the pediatric nurse version and the parent version of PNPPS were 0.961 and 0.964,the test-retest reliability was 0.971 and 0.932,and the content validity was 0.954 and 0.943,respectively. After exploratory factor analysis,both the pediatric nurse version and the parent version of PNPPS extracted 7 common factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rates were 72.10% and 73.51%,respectively.Conclusion The Chinese version of PNPPS has been proved to have good reliability and validity,and can be used to evaluate the partnership between pediatric nurses and parents of children in China.

Key words: Hospitals,Pediatric, Nurses, Child,Hospitalized, Partnership, Reliability, Validity

宫慧,魏丽丽,王静远,张艳,李雯,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣. 儿科护士与患儿父母伙伴关系量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(7): 638-643.

GONG Hui,WEI Li-li,WANG Jing-yuan,ZHANG Yan,LI Wen,LÜ Bo-han,ZOU Yu-jiao. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Pediatric Nurse Parent Partnership Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(7): 638-643.

图/表 1

参考文献 11

[1]	Jang HY. Partnership between staff and family in long-term care facility:a hybrid concept analysis[J]. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 2020, 15(1):1801179. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1801179
[2]	Klug J, Hall C, Delaplane EA, et al. Promoting parent partnership in developmentally supportive care for infants in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2020, 20(2):161-170. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000679
[3]	Bae SY, Lee I. The effect of child’s mother and nurse partnership on the anxiety and perceived quality of nursing care of hospitalized child’s mother[J]. Korea AcadInd Coop, 2017,(18):516-528.
[4]	Yoo SY, Cho H. Exploring the influences of nurses’ partnership with parents,attitude to families’ importance in nursing care,and professional self-efficacy on quality of pediatric nursing care:a path model[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Heal, 2020, 17(15):5452.
[5]	Uhm JY, Kim HS. Impact of the mother-nurse partnership programme on mother and infant outcomes in paediatric cardiac intensive care unit[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2019, 50:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.03.006
[6]	Jang HY, Song EO. Development and validation of the scale for partnership in care-for family(SPIC-F)[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(6):E1882.
[7]	Brødsgaard A, Larsen P, Weis J, et al. The perception of partnership between parents of premature infants and nurses in neonatal intensive care units:a systematic review protocol[J]. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep, 2016, 14(9):40-46. pmid: 27755315
[8]	Choi MY, Bang KS. Development and testing of a pediatric nurse parent partnership scale[J]. J Korean Acad Nurs, 2013, 43(2):194-202. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.194
[9]	Kim SC, Boren D, Solem SL. The Kim Alliance Scale:development and preliminary testing[J]. Clin Nurs Res, 2001, 10(3):314-331. pmid: 11881945
[10]	Watson R, Thompson DR. Use of factor analysis in Journal of Advanced Nursing:literature review[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2006, 55(3):330-341. pmid: 16866827
[11]	史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52.
	Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale deve-lopment[J]. J Central South Univ Med Sci, 2012, 37(2):49-52.

[1]	陈湘军, 胡芳, 汤黎, 谭小梅. 临床护士反思性实践水平及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1120-1125.
[2]	陈媛, 吴林静, 喻海燕, 王历刚. 心血管专科护士再评价管理体系的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1126-1131.
[3]	姜园园, 曹英娟, 管祥云, 张锦欣, 王美娟, 李黎. 以胜任力为导向的临床护士呼吸治疗培训目标与内容的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 968-975.
[4]	贾淑贤, 李娅, 李琳琳, 张京丽, 赵芹荣, 杨春玲. 心血管内科低年资护士临床急救能力培训方案的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 976-980.
[5]	张紫莹, 丁雯, 王茹, 曾美玲, 潘婷, 蒙浩莹. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者药物素养量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 993-999.
[6]	赵微微, 金玮艺, 朱金荣, 冯春燕, 张洪君, 苏默, 苏春燕. 北京地区血液净化专科护士护理实践现状调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 794-800.
[7]	赵文娟, 张晓菊, 来小彬, 沈志云, 张玉侠. 专职专科护士角色转换期真实工作体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 788-793.
[8]	陶琳, 易银萍, 蒋秋焕, 张红梅, 李黎明, 荆婵, 杜晓宁. 营养支持专科护士临床教学基地建设的探索[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 801-806.
[9]	方蘅英, 周雪玲, 梁骊敏, 蔡有弟, 陈思芸, 李慧娟. 成果导向视角下专科护士培训迁移的探索与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 807-811.
[10]	李春燕, 黄萍, 王晓静, 付逸超, 周田田, 何静静. 急诊急救专科护士培训基地评价指标的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 780-787.
[11]	田君叶, 苏莉, 张嘉晖, 丁炎明, 吴欣娟. 我国专科护士培训20年的发展与思考[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 773-779.
[12]	黄玉婷, 张慧琳, 朱婧, 邹颖, 覃祖明, 张晓可. 国内护士对死亡的态度现状及影响因素的系统评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 718-724.
[13]	张学颖, 张晓翠, 尹雪梅, 夏欣华, 王莹, 王蓓, 朱红. 危重症新生儿医源性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 731-737.
[14]	高肖, 魏丽丽, 周海清, 宫慧, 孙亚茹, 谷如婷. 多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 580-586.
[15]	白亚爽, 张增梅, 李胜云, 金子, 张淑利. 机器人辅助手术的护士培训方案构建及应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 517-524.