ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus

中华护理教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 145-150.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2026.02.003

• 专题策划——人工智能赋能护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能辅助案例教学在成人护理学课程中的应用与效果评价

刘雯(), 汪庆玲, 陆秋云, 朱爱勇*()   

  1. 上海健康医学院 上海市 201318
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-11 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-11
  • 通讯作者: * 朱爱勇,E-mail:zhuay@sumhs.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘雯:女,博士,副教授,E-mail:liuw_11@sumhs.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    2025年上海健康医学院教师教学研究项目(14)

Application and evaluation of generative artificial intelligence-assisted case-based teaching in Adult Nursing Course

LIU Wen(), WANG Qingling, LU Qiuyun, ZHU Aiyong*()   

  1. Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences,Shanghai 201318,China
  • Received:2025-07-11 Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-11
  • Contact: * ZHU Aiyong,E-mail:zhuay@sumhs.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    2025 Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty Teaching Research Project(14)

摘要:

目的 在成人护理学课程中应用生成式人工智能(generative artificial intelligence,GenAI)辅助案例教学,以探索促进AI技术与课堂教学有效融合的可行路径及效果。方法 构建GenAI辅助案例教学方案,并将其应用于2024学年—2025学年第二学期成人护理学课程授课中(n=182)。收集案例教学的结果性评价和过程性评价成绩,并将其与往届同期参与成人护理学课程传统案例教学的学生(n=167)成绩进行比较。结果 GenAI辅助案例教学组课后测试得分(P=0.019)、案例汇报与材料得分(P<0.001)、案例分析过程评价得分(P<0.001)、案例讨论发言参与率(P=0.002)均高于往届传统案例教学组。超过半数的学生认为GenAI辅助案例教学在助力案例理解、重难点知识掌握、提高学习积极性等方面发挥一定作用。结论 GenAI辅助案例教学在提高教学效果、提升讨论参与度等方面取得一定成效。教师需进一步加强对学生规范性使用GenAI的指导和监督,促进人工智能技术与课堂教学融合,提高人才培养质量。

关键词: 护理, 教育, 成人护理学, 课程, 生成式人工智能, 案例教学

Abstract:

Objective To apply generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technology to assist case-based teaching in the Adult Nursing course,exploring feasible pathways for effectively integrating AI technology into classroom teaching and evaluating its impact. Methods A GenAI-assisted case-based teaching framework was developed and implemented in the Adult Nursing course during the second semester of the 2024—2025 academic year (n=182). Outcome and process evaluation scores were collected and compared with the scores of students from previous cohorts who participated in traditional case-based teaching for the same course (n=167). Results Students in the GenAI-assisted group demonstrated significantly higher post-test scores (P=0.019),analytical process evaluation scores (P<0.001),and discussion participation rates (P=0.002) than the traditional group. Over 50% of students reported that GenAI-assisted case-based comprehension,mastery of key concepts,and learning motivation. Conclusion The teaching practice of case-based teaching empowered by GenAI technology has achieved certain results in improving teaching effectiveness and enhancing students’ participation in discussions. In subsequent course teaching,teachers need to further strengthen guidance and supervision of students’ standardized use of GenAI,deeply promote the effective integration of AI technology and classroom teaching,and improving the quality of talent cultivation.

Key words: Nursing, Education, Adult Nursing, Curriculum, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Case-based Learning