中华护理教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 114-118.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.01.022
收稿日期:
2022-01-26
出版日期:
2023-01-15
发布日期:
2023-01-17
通讯作者:
高钰琳
作者简介:
马玥:女,硕士,讲师,E-mail:基金资助:
MA Yue(),ZHAI Huimin,GAO Yulin()
Received:
2022-01-26
Online:
2023-01-15
Published:
2023-01-17
Contact:
Yulin GAO
摘要:
该文通过文献回顾,对护理专业学生在课堂教学、实验教学与临床教学环境中的个体层面与群体层面的学习心理安全感特点、主要影响因素与改善措施进行综述。教育者在院校教学中应注重增强教学设置的吸引性、保护学生自尊、注重观察学生状态调整教学进度、给予正向反馈;在临床教学中应侧重提升综合护理能力、弱化等级差异影响、巩固专业精神塑造的方式来增强学生的学习心理安全感。
马玥,翟惠敏,高钰琳. 护理专业学生学习心理安全感的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 114-118.
MA Yue,ZHAI Huimin,GAO Yulin. A review of research in the learning psychological safety of nursing students[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(1): 114-118.
[1] | 曾芳. 国内近20年课堂安全感研究述评[J]. 教学研究, 2018, 41(5):91-97. |
[2] | 刘军. 基于心理健康教育的大学生心理安全建设策略分析:评《大学生心理健康教育:积极心理学的运用》[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3):198. |
[3] | 孟子明. 大学生压力、心理弹性与心理安全感的关系研究[D]. 南宁: 广西师范学院, 2017. |
[4] | Kostovich CT, O’Rourke J, Stephen LA. Establishing psychological safety in simulation:faculty perceptions[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 91:104468. |
[5] |
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Adm Sci Q, 1999, 44(2):350-383.
doi: 10.2307/2666999 |
[6] |
Côté-Lussier C, Fitzpatrick C. Feelings of safety at school,socioe-motional functioning,and classroom engagement[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2016, 58(5):543-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.01.003 pmid: 26976149 |
[7] |
Turner S, Harder N. Psychological safe environment:a concept analysis[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2018, 18:47-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.02.004 |
[8] | McClintock AH, Fainstad TL, Jauregui J. Clinician teacher as leader:creating psychological safety in the clinical learning environment for medical students[J]. Acad Med, 2022,Publish Ahead of Print. |
[9] | Park JE, Kim JH. Nursing students’ psychological safety in high fidelity simulations:development of a new scale for psychometric evaluation[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 105:105017. |
[10] | 李金玲, 汪凤麟. 在线课堂学生学习注意力提升策略研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2021(13):22-26. |
Li JL, Wang FL. Research on strategies of improving students’ learning attention in online classroom[J]. Chin J ICT Educ, 2021(13):22-26. | |
[11] | 黄琼, 周仁来. 中国学生考试焦虑的发展趋势:纵向分析与横向验证[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(1):113-118. |
Huang Q, Zhou RL. The development of test anxiety in Chinese students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2019, 27(1):113-118. | |
[12] | 李英琦. 线上线下混合式课程个性化学习支持策略研究:以“信息化教学环境应用”课程为例[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2021. |
[13] | 张月华. 基于翻转课堂的合作学习组织策略研究[D]. 南充: 西华师范大学, 2019. |
Zhang YH. Research on cooperative learning organization stra-tegy based on flipped classroom[D]. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2019. | |
[14] | Papageorgi I. Thorndike’s law of effect[M]. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2018. |
[15] |
Rafi A, Ansar A, Sami MA. The implication of positive reinforcement strategy in dealing with disruptive behaviour in the classroom:a scoping review[J]. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College, 2020, 24(2):173-179
doi: 10.37939/jrmc.v24i2.1190 |
[16] |
Roh YS, Jang KI, Issenberg SB. Nursing students’ perceptions of simulation design features and learning outcomes:the me-diating effect of psychological safety[J]. Collegian, 2021, 28(2):184-189.
doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2020.06.007 |
[17] | Kang SJ, Min HY. Psychological safety in nursing simulation[J]. Nurse Educ, 2019, 44(2):E6-E9. |
[18] |
Tumala RB, Almazan J, Alabdulaziz H, et al. Assessment of nurs-ing students perceptions of their training hospital’s infection prevention climate:a multi-university study in Saudi Arabia[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019, 81:72-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.003 |
[19] |
Laing PAF, Harrison BJ. Safety learning and the Pavlovian conditioned inhibition of fear in humans:current state and future directions[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2021, 127:659-674.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.014 |
[20] | 化得福. 论罗杰斯的人本主义教育思想[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 42(4):152-155. |
[21] |
Hodges LC. Contemporary issues in group learning in undergraduate science classrooms:a perspective from student engagement[J]. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2018, 17(2):es3.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-11-0239 |
[22] |
Xie RY, Jiang JZ, Yue LK, et al. Under psychological safety climate:the beneficial effects of teacher-student conflict[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(15):9300.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159300 |
[23] | Park JE, Kim JH. Nursing students’ experiences of psychological safety in simulation education:a qualitative study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2021, 55:103163. |
[24] | 管静, 金晓燕, 董旭, 等. 模拟教学中护理教师实施引导性反馈的现况调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(11):965-972. |
Guan J, Jin XY, Dong X, et al. A survey of debriefing used in simulation teaching by nursing teachers[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2021, 18(11):965-972. | |
[25] |
Torralba KD, Jose D, Byrne J. Psychological safety,the hidden curriculum,and ambiguity in medicine[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2020, 39(3):667-671.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04889-4 pmid: 31902031 |
[26] |
Uhlig PN, Doll J, Brandon K, et al. Interprofessional practice and education in clinical learning environments:frontlines perspective[J]. Acad Med, 2018, 93(10):1441-1444.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002371 pmid: 30024477 |
[27] | Ghai A, Tandon U. Integrating gamification and instructional design to enhance usability of online learning[J]. Educ Inf Technol, 2022:1-20. |
[28] | 罗冰燕. 人本主义视角下心理课堂安全氛围的构建[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2020(4):23-24,27. |
[29] |
Reierson IÅ, Haukedal TA, Hedeman H, et al. Structured debriefing:what difference does it make?[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2017, 25:104-110.
doi: S1471-5953(16)30159-7 pmid: 28577417 |
[30] |
Roze des Ordons AL, Cheng A, Lockyer J, et al. Approaches to interpersonal conflict in simulation debriefings:a qualitative study[J]. Med Educ, 2021, 55(11):1284-1296.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14595 |
[31] |
Maweni RM, Foley RW, Lupi M, et al. Improving safety for medical students and patients during medical electives-a novel simulation-based course[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2019, 188(3):1033-1045.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1919-6 |
[32] |
Dokal K, Rampes S, Mukhammadaminov A, et al. Reducing the perceived power gap:a practical way to achieve psychological safety in undergraduate education[J]. Med Educ, 2020, 54(10):963.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14210 |
[33] |
Johnson CE, Keating JL, Molloy EK. Psychological safety in feedback:what does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it?[J]. Med Educ, 2020, 54(6):559-570.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14154 |
[34] |
Ridley CH, Al-Hammadi N, Maniar HS, et al. Building a collaborative culture:focus on psychological safety and error reporting[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 111(2):683-689.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.152 pmid: 32721456 |
[35] | 史瑞芬. 论“课程思政”视阈下的护理专业课程教学改革[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(8):586-590. |
Shi RF. Teaching reform of nursing specialty from the perspective of “Ideological and Political Theory Education”[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2019, 16(8):586-590. |
[1] | 安力彬,李小花,岳彤,陈华,孙宏玉. 《护理学类专业课程思政教学指南》解读[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 10-14. |
[2] | 郭金玉,穆小楠,孙红,孙玉梅,王泠. 新入职护士培训效果评价的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 119-122. |
[3] | 李晨阳,邵乐文. 老年糖尿病患者衰弱影响因素及干预措施的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 123-128. |
[4] | 王志稳,刘聪颖,吴雪. 以学生发展为中心的护理研究课程思政教学设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 19-23. |
[5] | 王琳,张媛媛,章雅青. 混合式教学模式下护理管理学课程思政的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 24-28. |
[6] | 邓颖,吴瑛. 成人护理学课程思政教学设计[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 29-33. |
[7] | 林伟,洪霞,方凤贞,张璟,李冬秀,向月,陈婷玉,林雅珠. 高职护理专业健康评估课程理实一体化教学改革与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 64-67. |
[8] | 庄红霞,荆晓雷,王雪琪,徐昊,陈鹏,孙芳,李娟. 颅脑解剖可视化工具在神经外科临床护理教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 68-72. |
[9] | 韩静,韩菲,周芳,谈子怡,孙旭. 护理专业学生对医院驻点教学模式的适应过程研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(9): 801-805. |
[10] | 谭睿. 台北护理健康大学老年健康照护专业课程体系的设置及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(9): 792-795. |
[11] | 吴佳艳,陈琴,吴梦. 日本养老护理人才培养与启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(9): 796-800. |
[12] | 杨国辉,周明瑶,朱怡婷,王佳怡,李心钰,周洁,吴彩琴,张锦玉. 本科护理学专业课程思政教学实践的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(9): 847-851. |
[13] | 唐娇,李福英,张云美,罗忠琛. 中国大学生医学技术技能大赛护理专业学生的参赛动机与成长体验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(8): 687-691. |
[14] | 颜玲琴. 基于技能大赛的护理技能操作项目教学改革[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(8): 692-694. |
[15] | 林洁,王惠珠,向月,吴玉环,吴风霞,谢伙生. 基于姿势识别技术的自主研发心肺复苏培训软件在高职护理专业教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(8): 699-703. |
|