孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.09.018

中华护理教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (9): 855-859.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.09.018

孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建

胡颖(),周明芳(),范尧,俞丽丽,大城昌平,顾寿智

433-8558日本静冈县滨松市圣隶克里斯托弗大学康复学院(胡颖,大城昌平,顾寿智), 重庆医科大学附属第三医院(周明芳,俞丽丽), 重庆医科大学公共卫生管理学院(范尧)

收稿日期:2020-11-10 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-27
通讯作者: 周明芳
作者简介:胡颖:女,硕士(博士在读),主管护师, E-mail: <email>46677156@qq.com</email>
基金资助:
重庆医科大学附属第三医院护理骨干科研资助计划(KY08044)

Construction of “Internet+” centering pregnancy health care course in late pregnancy

HU Ying(),ZHOU Ming-fang(),FAN Yao,YU Li-li,Shohei Ohgi,GU Shou-zhi

Received:2020-11-10 Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-27
Contact: Ming-fang ZHOU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的构建针对孕晚期孕妇的“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程,为开展孕晚期孕妇线上健康教育提供参考。方法通过查阅文献及专家论证,初步形成孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程相关内容,并于2020年2月—6月,运用德尔菲法对北京、上海、四川、湖南、湖北、重庆6个省份的临床、教学领域的专家进行2轮函询。结果 2轮函询问卷的回收率分别为94%和100%,专家权威系数为0.863;专家意见协调系数分别为0.33、0.58（均P<0.05）,变异系数为0.02~0.21。最终课程包括4个模块（一级条目）、18个项目（二级条目）。结论 “互联网+”集中群组化孕晚期保健课程具有很好的科学性及可靠性,可用于孕晚期孕妇的线上健康教育。

关键词: 孕妇, 教育, 远程, 同侪集群, 课程

Abstract:

Objective In order to construct a “Internet+” centering pregnancy health care course for women in late pregnancy,and provide reference for developing online health education in third trimester. Methods Through literature review and expert demonstration,the content of“Internet +” centering pregnancy health care course was initially formed. In February to June 2020,Delphi technique was used to conduct two rounds of consultation with experts in the fields of clinical,teaching and scientific research in Beijing,Shanghai,Sichuan,Hunan,Hubei and Chongqing. Results The recovery rates of the two rounds of questionnaires were 94% and 100% respectively,and the overall authority coefficient was 0.863;the coordination degree of importance was 0.33 and 0.58 respectively（all P<0.05）,and the coefficient of variation was 0.02~0.21. The final course includes 4 modules（first-level items） and 18 projects（second-level items）. Conclusion “Internet +” centering pregnancy health care course for women in late pregnancy is scientificity and reliability,and can be used in the third pregnancy network health education.

Key words: Pregnant Women, Education, Distance, Peer Group, Curriculum

胡颖, 周明芳, 范尧, 俞丽丽, 大城昌平, 顾寿智. 孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 855-859.

HU Ying, ZHOU Ming-fang, FAN Yao, YU Li-li, Shohei Ohgi, GU Shou-zhi. Construction of “Internet+” centering pregnancy health care course in late pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(9): 855-859.

图/表 1

参考文献 15

[1]	Rouhe H, Salmela-Aro K, Halmesmäki E, et al. Fear of childbirth according to parity,gestational age,and obstetric history[J]. BJOG, 2009, 116(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x
[2]	危娟, 刘洁英, 吴艳萍, 等. 孕妇分娩恐惧状况及其影响因素调查[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(14):86-89.
	Wei J, Liu JY, Wu YP, et al. Investigation of fear of childbirth and its influencing factors[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016, 31(14):86-89.
[3]	胡颖, 周明芳, 万艳平. 孕妇孕晚期分娩恐惧现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2020, 20(11):768-773.
	Hu Y, Zhou MF, Wan YP. Study on the current situation and influencing factors of pregnant women’s fear of childbirth in late pregnancy[J]. J Nurs Adm, 2020, 20(11):768-773.
[4]	任广秀, 杨富国, 刘志梅, 等. 初产妇及其配偶产前健康教育获益现状及影响因素调查[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(4):69-71.
	Ren GX, Yang FG, Liu ZM, et al. Research on primiparous couples’ perceived benefits from prenatal health education and the influencing factors[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2018, 33(4):69-71.
[5]	张小燕, 林艳, 符白玲. 孕妇对“互联网+”健康教育模式感知的质性研究[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊), 2020, 27(4):8-10.
	Zhang XY, Lin Y, Fu BL. Qualitative study on pregnant women’s perception of “Internet plus” health education mode[J]. Today Nurse, 2020, 27(4):8-10.
[6]	陈晓曼, 陈雪娇. “互联网+孕妇学校”模式在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇孕期保健中的应用效果[J]. 糖尿病新世界, 2019, 22(19):149-151.
	Chen XM, Chen XJ. Application of “Internet plus pregnant school” mode in gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy health care[J]. Diabetes New World, 2019, 22(19):149-151.
[7]	严佳倩. 孕妇健康管理类App需求及其影响因素分析[D]. 杭州:杭州师范大学, 2017.
	Yan JQ. Analysis on the demand of pregnant women’s health management App and its influencing factors[D]. Hangzhou:Hangzhou Normal University, 2017.
[8]	温峥, 张淑萍. 网络微信平台在孕产妇围生期健康教育中的效果观察[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2018, 34(7):534-537.
	Wen Z, Zhang SP. Effect of the health education of maternal perinatal period by WeChat platform[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2018, 34(7):534-537.
[9]	Rising SS. Centering pregnancy:an interdisciplinary model of empowerment[J]. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1998, 43(1):46-54. pmid: 9489291
[10]	李林蔚, 张彩虹, 郭洪花. 群组式护理模式在围产期保健的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(23):41-44.
	Li LW, Zhang CH, Guo HH. Application progress of group nursing model in perinatal care[J]. J Nurs (China), 2019, 26(23):41-44.
[11]	张秀珍, 张晶, 周临, 等. 以家庭为中心群组式孕期保健模式实施效果的质性研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(19):3550-3552.
	Zhang XZ, Zhang J, Zhou L, et al. Implementation effect of family-centered group prenatal care model:a qualitative study[J]. Maternal & Child Health Care of China, 2020, 35(19):3550-3552.
[12]	黄艳红, 林娟, 薛小凌. 互联网+背景下的孕期健康教育探讨[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2016, 22(3):84-86.
	Huang YH, Lin J, Xue XL. Health education in pregnancy under Internet plus background[J]. Strait Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2016, 22(3):84-86.
[13]	Sayakhot P， Carolan-olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information:a systematic review[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2016, 16:65-70. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0856-5
[14]	Ouyaba AT, Kesim SI. The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy:a systematic review[J]. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 2020, 8:84-87.
[15]	Mccarthy R, Byrne G, Brettle A, et al. Midwife-moderated social media groups as a validated information source for women during pregnancy[J]. Midwifery, 2020, 88:102710. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102710

孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建

Construction of “Internet+” centering pregnancy health care course in late pregnancy

HTML阅读

PDF下载

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李津, 张婧珺, 杨磊, 李小妹. 护理学导论线上线下混合式 “金课”建设[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 773-776.
[2]	李欣, 庞冬, 陆宇晗, 马晓晓, 候晓婷. 临终护理培训课程的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 860-864.
[3]	韦帅芳, 徐克珮, 杨玉洁, 刘华平. 虚拟社区在慢性病患者健康教育中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 789-794.
[4]	张磊. 护理高职生亲社会行为与共情能力的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 823-826.
[5]	黄婷,丁梅,洪晓彤,黄蓉. 国外老年痴呆症照护在线开放课程介绍及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 799-802.
[6]	刘燕,白阳娟,卢玉林,李莹霞,李铭. 多专业学生案例讨论在护理本科生临床思维能力培养中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 803-808.
[7]	杨园园, 陈华, 郭立涛. 护理本科生新生儿护理临床见习线上教学的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 809-813.
[8]	吕菲, 薛梅. OSCE在高职涉外护理方向学生核心能力评价中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 814-818.
[9]	章琛越,朱雪娇. 减少脑卒中患者延迟就医行为健康教育的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 759-764.
[10]	侯锦,郭爱敏. 英国诺丁汉大学跨专业教育与学习中心见闻与启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 765-768.
[11]	郭敏敏,康凤英,杨云静,刘星芳. 改良版正念自我同情训练在护理硕士专业学位研究生中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 690-694.
[12]	谢鹏,李慧琴,陈蕾. 基于离散选择实验的护理硕士专业学位研究生对临床带教的偏好研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 700-705.
[13]	董胜雯,张丽丽,于雅文,胡立志. 混合式教学与全程线上教学在助产学课程中应用效果比较[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 706-709.
[14]	陈恬,胡韵,俞珮璐,施逸雯. 护理教师视角下基于合作博弈论的跨专业教育促进因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 710-715.
[15]	张俊娥,靳颖,尤黎明,覃惠英,冯晓玲,刘可. 护理管理学研究生精品课程的构建与思考[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 716-718.