混合式教学与全程线上教学在助产学课程中应用效果比较

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的比较混合式教学与全程线上教学在本科助产学课程中的应用效果,探讨学生线上学习效果的影响因素。方法天津医科大学2016级助产学课程采用混合式教学开展,包括19学时的线上教学和46学时的线下教学。2017级助产学课程采用全程线上教学,共65学时。两个年级各25名学生,通过平台收集助产方向学生线上学习数据,比较两个年级教学视频观看时长反刍比、单次课程互动得分、任务点完成分数、单次课程学生访问次数、线上课程测验平均得分和期末考试成绩。结果两个年级学生任务点完成分数和单次课程学生访问次数差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;2017级学生观看教学视频时长反刍比低于2016级（t=3.425,P<0.05）;2017级学生的单次课程学生互动得分、线上课程测验平均得分高于2016级（P<0.05）,2017级期末考试成绩低于2016级（t=2.591,P<0.05）。经多元线性回归分析,单次课程互动得分和单次课程学生访问次数是线上课程测验得分的影响因素,可解释总变异的65.4%。结论混合式教学可充分发挥线上、线下的合并优势,教师为学生提供多样化学习服务能够提高学生主动性,提升学习参与度,有助于提升线上学习效率;同时在线下课程中通过提问、讨论等策略提升教学质量,更有利于把握学生整体学习效果。

关键词: 护理教育研究, 教育, 远程, 助产学, 混合式教学

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of the blended teaching and the online teaching in Midwifery course. Methods Twenty-five students enrolled in 2016 in Tianjin Medical University were taught by the blended teaching method including 19h of online teaching and 46h of offline teaching. Another 25 students recruited in 2017 were taught by the online teaching method with a total of 65h. We collected the students’ online learning data through the platform. The ratio of video teaching time and video actual time,interaction score of each class,task completion score,number of visits per class,average online test score and final exam score were all compared between the two groups with different teaching method. Results There was no statistically significant differences in the task completion score and number of visits per class between the two grades（P>0.05）. The ratio of video teaching time and video actual time of students enrolled in 2017 was lower than that of the students in grade 2016（t=3.435,P<0.05）. The interaction score of each class and online tests of the students of grade 2017 were higher than those of the students of grade 2016（P<0.05）. The final exam score of students in grade 2017 were lower than that of the students in grade 2016（t=2.591,P<0.05）. After multiple linear regression analysis,the interaction score and the number of visits per class were the influencing factors of the online course test score,accounting for 65.4% of the total variation. Conclusion The blended teaching can combine the advantages of online and offline. Teachers can provide students with diversified learning services to improve students’ initiative and participation in learning. The blended teaching can improve the efficiency of online learning. Besides,the quality of teaching is improved through strategies such as questioning and discussion in offline courses,which is more conducive to know the overall learning effects of students.

Key words: Nursing Education Research, Education, Distance, Midwifery, Blended teaching

董胜雯,张丽丽,于雅文,胡立志. 混合式教学与全程线上教学在助产学课程中应用效果比较[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 706-709.

DONG Sheng-wen,ZHANG Li-li,YU Ya-wen,HU Li-zhi. Effect comparisons of the blended teaching and the online teaching in Midwifery course[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(8): 706-709.

图/表 2

参考文献 8

[1]	王恬, 康琳琳, 吴梦晓, 等. 我国医学类慕课课程建设的现状调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2018, 15(1):30-34.
	Wang T, Kang LL, Wu MX, et al. A survey of medical MOOC development in China[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2018, 15(1):30-34.
[2]	René FK, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Jorge JM. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses[J]. Computers & Education, 2017, 104:18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
[3]	张胜男. 研究生网络自主学习元认知能力水平的现状调查与分析[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2015.
	Zhang SN. Investigation and analysis of the status quo of the metacognitive ability level of postgraduates’ autonomous online learning[D]. Jinan:Shandong Normal University, 2015.
[4]	Arora S, Goel M, Sabitha AS, et al. Learner groups in massive open online courses[J]. American Journal of Distance Education, 2017, 31(2),80-97. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2017.1300461
[5]	李爽, 王增贤, 喻忱, 等. 在线学习行为投入分析框架与测量指标研究——基于LMS数据的学习分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(2):77-88.
	Li S, Wang ZX, Yu C, et al. Mining LMS data for behavioral engagement indicators in online learning environments[J]. Open Education Research, 2016, 22(2):77-88.
[6]	王罗春, 胡晨燕, 蒋路漫, 等. 关于在我国高校推广慕课教学的几点思考[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2016(39):243-244.
	Wang LC, Hu CY, Jiang LM, et al. Some thoughts on popularizing MOOC teaching in Chinese colleges and universities[J]. Educ Teach Forum, 2016(39):243-244.
[7]	Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, et al. Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process:results of a mixed-method evaluation[J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2009(14),725-738.
[8]	杨孝堂, 陈守刚, 严冰. 泛在学习的理论与模式[M]. 北京: 中央广播电视大学出版社, 2012.
	Yang XT, Chen SG, Yan B. The theory and model of ubiquitous learning[M]. Beijing: China Central Radio and Television University Press, 2012.

[1]	李津, 张婧珺, 杨磊, 李小妹. 护理学导论线上线下混合式 “金课”建设[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 773-776.
[2]	胡颖, 周明芳, 范尧, 俞丽丽, 大城昌平, 顾寿智. 孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 855-859.
[3]	李欣, 庞冬, 陆宇晗, 马晓晓, 候晓婷. 临终护理培训课程的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 860-864.
[4]	韦帅芳, 徐克珮, 杨玉洁, 刘华平. 虚拟社区在慢性病患者健康教育中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 789-794.
[5]	张磊. 护理高职生亲社会行为与共情能力的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 823-826.
[6]	黄婷,丁梅,洪晓彤,黄蓉. 国外老年痴呆症照护在线开放课程介绍及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 799-802.
[7]	刘燕,白阳娟,卢玉林,李莹霞,李铭. 多专业学生案例讨论在护理本科生临床思维能力培养中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 803-808.
[8]	杨园园, 陈华, 郭立涛. 护理本科生新生儿护理临床见习线上教学的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 809-813.
[9]	吕菲, 薛梅. OSCE在高职涉外护理方向学生核心能力评价中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 814-818.
[10]	张俊娥,靳颖,尤黎明,覃惠英,冯晓玲,刘可. 护理管理学研究生精品课程的构建与思考[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 716-718.
[11]	朱琴,颜巧元. 世界技能大赛健康与社会照护项目对高职护理专业教学的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 719-722.
[12]	张永爱,曹弘毅,褚静,张海苗,牛育鸿. 护理专业考试命题与试卷分析中的问题及要点解析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 723-726.
[13]	郭敏敏,康凤英,杨云静,刘星芳. 改良版正念自我同情训练在护理硕士专业学位研究生中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 690-694.
[14]	谢鹏,李慧琴,陈蕾. 基于离散选择实验的护理硕士专业学位研究生对临床带教的偏好研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 700-705.
[15]	陈恬,胡韵,俞珮璐,施逸雯. 护理教师视角下基于合作博弈论的跨专业教育促进因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 710-715.