中华护理教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8): 755-758.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.017
收稿日期:
2020-09-23
出版日期:
2021-08-20
发布日期:
2021-08-24
通讯作者:
黄丽华
作者简介:
杨苏:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail: 基金资助:
Received:
2020-09-23
Online:
2021-08-20
Published:
2021-08-24
Contact:
Li-hua HUANG
摘要:
该文对跨专业共享决策模式的定义、影响医疗环境的3个层次水平(宏观、中观、微观)及跨专业共享决策模式在护理决策实践中的应用进行综述。同时,也提出国内学者进行跨专业共享决策实践时可考虑从丰富护理核心课程的内容和形式、构建以专科护士为主导的跨专业团队等方面入手,以推动跨专业共享决策模式在医疗实践中的运用。
杨苏,黄丽华. 跨专业共享决策模式的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 755-758.
YANG Su,HUANG Li-hua. Research progress on interprofessional shared decision-making model[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(8): 755-758.
[1] |
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter:revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1999, 49(5):651-661.
pmid: 10452420 |
[2] | Légaré F, O’Connor AC, Graham I, et al. Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions:use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework[J]. Can Fam Physician Med De Fam Can, 2006, 52:476-477. |
[3] |
Stacey D, Brière N, Robitaille H, et al. A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making[J]. J Interprof Care, 2014, 28(5):453-459.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.911157 pmid: 24766619 |
[4] | Amalakuhan B, Adams SG. Improving outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:the role of the interprofessional app-roach[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10:1225-1232. |
[5] |
Lenzen SA, Daniëls R, van Bokhoven MA, et al. What makes it so difficult for nurses to coach patients in shared decision making? A process evaluation[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 80:1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.005 |
[6] |
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients:a systematic review and thematic synjournal of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(3):291-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 pmid: 24305642 |
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients:a systematic review and thematic synjournal of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(3):291-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 pmid: 24305642 |
|
[7] |
Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making:a mixed methods study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(4):554-564.
doi: 10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-4 |
Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making:a mixed methods study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(4):554-564.
doi: 10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-4 |
|
[8] | Härter MD, Moumjid N, Cornuz J, et al. Shared decision making in 2017:International accomplishments in policy,research and implementation[J]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz,Fortbildung und Qua-lität im Gesundheitswesen, 2017,123- 124:1-5. |
Härter MD, Moumjid N, Cornuz J, et al. Shared decision making in 2017:International accomplishments in policy,research and implementation[J]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz,Fortbildung und Qua-lität im Gesundheitswesen, 2017,123- 124:1-5. | |
[9] |
Zou XN. Epidemic trend,screening,and early detection and treatment of cancer in Chinese population[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2017, 14(1):50-59.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0047 |
Zou XN. Epidemic trend,screening,and early detection and treatment of cancer in Chinese population[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2017, 14(1):50-59.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0047 |
|
[10] |
Tucker JD, Wong B, Nie JB, et al. Rebuilding patient-physician trust in China[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10046):755.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31362-9 |
Tucker JD, Wong B, Nie JB, et al. Rebuilding patient-physician trust in China[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10046):755.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31362-9 |
|
[11] | Lühnen J, Mühlhauser I, Richter T. Informed decision-making with and for people with dementia:developing and pilot testing an education program for legal representatives(PRODECIDE)[J]. Dementia(London), 2019, 18(6):2303-2321. |
Lühnen J, Mühlhauser I, Richter T. Informed decision-making with and for people with dementia:developing and pilot testing an education program for legal representatives(PRODECIDE)[J]. Dementia(London), 2019, 18(6):2303-2321. | |
[12] |
Yu CH, Ivers NM, Stacey D, et al. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2015, 16:286.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8 |
Yu CH, Ivers NM, Stacey D, et al. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2015, 16:286.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8 |
|
[13] |
Davies N, Schiowitz B, Rait G, et al. Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care:a systematic review[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2019, 31(10):1403-1419.
doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826 |
Davies N, Schiowitz B, Rait G, et al. Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care:a systematic review[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2019, 31(10):1403-1419.
doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826 |
|
[14] |
Keshmiri F, Rezai M, Tavakoli N. The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making:perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2020, 26(4):1153-1161.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13379 pmid: 32114699 |
Keshmiri F, Rezai M, Tavakoli N. The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making:perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2020, 26(4):1153-1161.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13379 pmid: 32114699 |
|
[15] |
Edwards ST, Hooker ER, Brienza R, et al. Association of a multisite interprofessional education initiative with quality of primary care[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2019, 2(11):e1915943.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15943 |
Edwards ST, Hooker ER, Brienza R, et al. Association of a multisite interprofessional education initiative with quality of primary care[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2019, 2(11):e1915943.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15943 |
|
[16] | Michalsen A, Long AC, Dekeyser Ganz F, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU[J]. Critical Care Me-dicine, 2019, 47(9):1258-1266. |
Michalsen A, Long AC, Dekeyser Ganz F, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU[J]. Critical Care Me-dicine, 2019, 47(9):1258-1266. | |
[17] |
Lee YK, Ng CJ. The state of shared decision making in Ma-laysia[J]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 123/124:66-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019 |
Lee YK, Ng CJ. The state of shared decision making in Ma-laysia[J]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 123/124:66-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019 |
|
[18] |
Van den Bulcke B, Vyt A, Vanheule S, et al. The perceived quality of interprofessional teamwork in an intensive care unit:a single centre intervention study[J]. J Interprof Care, 2016, 30(3):301-308.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1146876 pmid: 27152533 |
Van den Bulcke B, Vyt A, Vanheule S, et al. The perceived quality of interprofessional teamwork in an intensive care unit:a single centre intervention study[J]. J Interprof Care, 2016, 30(3):301-308.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1146876 pmid: 27152533 |
|
[19] |
Berger-Höger B, Liethmann K, Mühlhauser I, et al. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers:a cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 93:141-152.
doi: S0020-7489(19)30027-6 pmid: 30925280 |
Berger-Höger B, Liethmann K, Mühlhauser I, et al. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers:a cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 93:141-152.
doi: S0020-7489(19)30027-6 pmid: 30925280 |
|
[20] |
Buhse S, Kuniss N, Liethmann K, et al. Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care:cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(12):e024004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004 |
Buhse S, Kuniss N, Liethmann K, et al. Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care:cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(12):e024004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004 |
[1] | 吴艳梅,吴迪,高祖梅,任艳蕊,蔡晓美. 护理硕士专业学位研究生临床培养方案的整合与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 686-689. |
[2] | 陈恬,胡韵,俞珮璐,施逸雯. 护理教师视角下基于合作博弈论的跨专业教育促进因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 710-715. |
[3] | 侯锦,郭爱敏. 英国诺丁汉大学跨专业教育与学习中心见闻与启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 765-768. |
[4] | 李华伟,崔亚楠,李云芳,王孝琪,刘立军,栗泽栋,王国宁. 跨专业合作在本科生急救仿真模拟教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9): 785-789. |
[5] | 程欢,吴丽萍. 护理硕士专业学位研究生医护合作仿真模拟教学案例编制[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9): 790-793. |
[6] | 田雨同,张艳,赵敬,杜灿灿,李宏洁,刘珍,金丽园,许冰,程青云. 本科护理实习生跨专业合作学习准备度及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9): 794-798. |
[7] | 杨冰香,刘烁,王金娜,李婷,徐爱京,方雅璇,金三丽. 模拟强化医学跨专业教育的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9): 799-802. |
[8] | 李珊珊, 高莉莉, 宁美, 宫叶琴, 郎玉玲, 张淑敏, 李美, 智喜荷, 叶茜. 跨专业合作在本科生手术室实践教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(5): 439-442. |
[9] | 江悦妍,尹心红,万艳平,蒋丹丹,黄奥兰,谭修竹. 护理硕士专业学位研究生临床思维与决策课程的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(4): 342-345. |
[10] | 饶堃, 彭刚艺. 北美国际护理诊断定义与分类(2018—2020)修订解读[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(3): 285-288. |
[11] | 王雪. 护理本科生择业效能感与专业认同对职业决策困难的影响[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(12): 1097-1100. |
[12] | 相林,刘清波,顾晗昕,万佳,李朝晖,孔梦娜,梁涛. 加拿大Baycrest跨专业合作老年护理模式对我国的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(7): 558-560. |
[13] | 黄道花 李娟 查莹娟. 护理多专科团队协作查房的实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2018, 15(6): 441-443. |
[14] | 王亚霖 黄志红 郑婧 刘慧. 河南省护理本科生职业决策困难现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2016, 13(9): 650-654. |
[15] | 黄茜茜 蔡松妲. 领导-成员交换质量对护士伦理决策的影响[J]. 中华护理教育, 2016, 13(8): 596-598. |
|