eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus

Chinese Journal of Nursing Education ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11): 1380-1386.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2026.11.015

• Professional Practice • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction and preliminary clinical application evaluation of a quality evaluation indicator system for hospice care services

WANG Dan1(), ZHAO Yun2,*(), ZHOU Ning3, LU Yan4, SUN Yali5, GAO Fulin6, YANG Bo7, GU Feng8, ZHANG Rui1   

  1. 1 Department of Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China
    2 Office of International Cooperation, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
    3 Department of Hospice Care, Eastern Theater Air Force Hospital, Nanjing 210002, China
    4 Department of Nursing, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong 226361, China
    5 Department of Interventional Radiology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
    6 Department of Nursing, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
    7 Department of Urology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
    8 Department of Nursing, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Received:2025-12-21 Online:2026-11-15 Published:2026-11-04
  • Contact: *ZHAO Yun,E-mail:zyunchina@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Project of Hospital Management Innovation Research of Jiangsu Hospital Association(JSYGY-2-2025-322)

Abstract:

Objective To construct a scientific quality evaluation indicator system aligned with hospice care practice in China,and to provide a standardized reference for service homogenization and specialty nursing talent training. Methods Taking Donabedian’s Structure-Process-Outcome(SPO) model as the framework,an initial indicator pool was formed through systematic literature review and policy text analysis at national,provincial-municipal and institutional levels. Two rounds of anonymous Delphi consultation were conducted with 21 multidisciplinary experts from eight provinces and municipalities in China. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to calculate the combined weights of each indicator. Two palliative care specialty nurses used this evaluation index system to conduct a retrospective application evaluation on the case data of 30 patients. Results The effective response rates of the two rounds of consultation were 100% and 95%,respectively. The expert authority coefficient was 0.916,and Kendall’s coefficients of concordance were 0.087 and 0.110,respectively(both P<0.001). The final system comprised three first-level,13 second-level,and 44 third-level indicators. Process quality had the highest weight(0.474),covering full-scenario care across institution,community,and home settings. Preliminary clinical application evaluation showed good inter-rater reliability(ICC=0.823,P<0.001),with an average evaluation time of 25.4 minutes per case. Conclusion The constructed indicator system aligns with relevant policies and practice guidelines and shows preliminary feasibility in the inpatient setting. Further studies are needed to examine the applicability and performance of the indicators in community and home care settings.

Key words: Hospice Care, Health Service Quality Evaluation, Delphi Method, Indicator System, Nursing