基于设计思维模型的健康评估本科课程实验教学改革与评价研究

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2026.02.010

中华护理教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 189-194.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2026.02.010

基于设计思维模型的健康评估本科课程实验教学改革与评价研究

尤丽丽¹(), 陈欣¹, 张慧², 宋萌¹, 孔姗姗¹, 朱秀惠¹, 关玉霞³^,^*()

1.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院内科学系消化内科一病房北京市 100730
2.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院护理学院北京市 100144
3.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院护理部北京市 100730

收稿日期:2025-06-03 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-11
通讯作者: * 关玉霞，E-mail：1397692094@qq.com
作者简介:尤丽丽：女，硕士，副主任护师，E-mail：32615682@qq.com
基金资助:
北京协和医学院课程思政教改项目(2024kcsz020)

Implementation and evaluation of experimental teaching in Health Assessment Courses based on design thinking

YOU Lili¹(), CHEN Xin¹, ZHANG Hui², SONG Meng¹, KONG Shanshan¹, ZHU Xiuhui¹, GUAN Yuxia³^,^*()

1. Division of Gastroenterology，Department of Internal Medicine，Peking Union Medical College Hospital，Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College，Beijing 100730，China
2. School of Nursing，Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College，Beijing 100144，China
3. Nursing Department，Peking Union Medical College Hospital，Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College，Beijing 100730，China

Received:2025-06-03 Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-11
Contact: * GUAN Yuxia，E-mail：1397692094@qq.com
Supported by:
Curriculum Ideological and Political Education Reform Project of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College(2024kcsz020)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨基于设计思维模型的健康评估课程实验教学的效果。方法在帮助学生建立对人文关怀感知的基础上，在健康评估实验课程中对便利抽取的某医学院校2023级140名护理本科生实施基于设计思维“3I”（Inspiration为灵感，Ideation为构思，Implementation为实施）模型、融入人文关怀的以问题为导向的教学（problem-based learning，PBL）。通过课程实验考核成绩，以及对目的抽取的10名护理本科生、4例标准化病人的访谈结果，评估教学成效。结果 140名护理本科生健康评估课程实验考核成绩为（92.60±4.33）分，在资料收集、身体评估、沟通交流、人文关怀维度上的得分依次为（22.21±1.46）分、（33.06±1.89）分、（13.66±0.91）分、（23.28±1.25）分。访谈资料分析结果显示，学生通过教学不仅获得了学习兴趣激发、学习效率提升等良好的学习体验，还实现了创新思维的培育、专业认同感的提升、人文关怀的意义建构等；标准化病人感受到学生沟通与创新能力的提升、来自学生的人文关怀温度，并且对护理职业与个人价值的认同感增强。结论基于设计思维模型的健康评估课程实验教学能够有效培养护理本科生的人文关怀能力与综合素质，效果获得多方认可，可为学生后续的学习与工作奠定价值基础。

关键词: 设计思维, 健康评估, 实验教学, 人文关怀, 同理心

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of a design thinking-based experimental teaching in Health Assessment Experimental Course. Methods On the basis of helping students establish the perception of humanistic care in the Health Assessment Course，a problem-based learning（PBL） teaching model integrating humanistic care was implemented in the experimental course. The model was based on the design thinking “3I” framework （Inspiration，Ideation，and Implementation）. A total of 140 nursing undergraduates from the Class of 2023 at a medical college were selected by convenience sampling as the participants. The effects of the teaching model was evaluated through the experimental assessment scores of the course. Additionally，semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 purposively sampled nursing undergraduates and 4 standardized patients. Results The average experimental assessment score of the 140 nursing undergraduates in the Health Assessment Course was（92.60±4.33）. Their scores in the dimensions of data collection，physical assessment，communication，and humanistic care were（22.21±1.46），（33.06±1.89），（13.66±0.91），and （23.28±1.25） respectively. The analysis of interview data showed that students not only gained positive learning experiences such as stimulated learning interest and improved learning efficiency，but also achieved the cultivation of innovative thinking，enhanced professional identity，and the construction of the significance of humanistic care. Standardized patients reported that students had improved communication and innovation abilities，and could deliver humanistic care with sincerity. They also reported an enhanced sense of identification with the nursing profession and personal value. Conclusion The design thinking-based Health Assessment Course can effectively cultivate nursing undergraduates’ humanistic care competence and comprehensive quality，and its effect has been recognized by multiple stakeholders. It helps establish a solid value foundation for students’ subsequent learning and clinical practice.

Key words: Design Thinking, Health Assessment, Experimental Teaching, Humanistic Care, Empathy

尤丽丽, 陈欣, 张慧, 宋萌, 孔姗姗, 朱秀惠, 关玉霞. 基于设计思维模型的健康评估本科课程实验教学改革与评价研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2026, 23(2): 189-194.

YOU Lili, CHEN Xin, ZHANG Hui, SONG Meng, KONG Shanshan, ZHU Xiuhui, GUAN Yuxia. Implementation and evaluation of experimental teaching in Health Assessment Courses based on design thinking[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2026, 23(2): 189-194.

图/表 1

参考文献 17

[1]	周闯, 金学勤, 马晓敏. 护士人文关怀的研究进展[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2024, 37(1):100-107.
	Zhou C, Jin XQ, Ma XM. Research progress of nurses’ huma-nistic caring[J]. Chin Med Ethics, 2024, 37(1):100-107.
[2]	唐楠, 贾盈盈, 韩琳. 护理学专业课程思政教学研究文献计量学分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3):310-313.
	Tang N, Jia YY, Han L. Research progress of ideological and political teaching of nursing courses based on bibliometric analysis[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2023, 20(3):310-313.
[3]	余丽君, 姜亚芳. 健康评估[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2012.
	Yu LJ, Jiang YF. Health Assessment[M]. 2ed ed.ed. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2012.
[4]	张小敏, 章新琼, 王芹, 等. 浅析护理人文关怀:从概念、理论到实践发展[J]. 医学与哲学, 2019, 40(1):54-56.
	Zhang XM, Zhang XQ, Wang Q, et al. Discussion on humanistic care of nursing:from concept,theory to practice[J]. Med Philos, 2019, 40(1):54-56.
[5]	Jian S, Ya M, Qian Z, et al. Research progress on humanistic care ability and influencing factors of intern nursing students[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 26(23):8637-8643.
[6]	宗旭倩, 李丹钰, 袁长蓉, 等. 设计思维及其在护理领域中的应用与展望[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(13):124-129.
	Zong XQ, Li DY, Yuan CR, et al. Design thinking in health care:a review[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2023, 38(13):124-129.
[7]	何克抗. 建构主义的教学模式、教学方法与教学设计[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1997(5):74-81.
	He KK. Constructivist teaching models,teaching methods,and instructional design[J]. J Beijing Norm Univ Soc Sci, 1997(5):74-81.
[8]	Tschimmel K. Design thinking as an effective toolkit for inno-vation[C]. Barcelona: XXII Ispim Conference, 2012.
[9]	张欣, 尤丽丽, 高娜, 等. 以提升沟通能力为导向的健康评估教学改革[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(6):508-511.
	Zhang X, You LL, Gao N, et al. Teaching reform of health as-sessment based on communication ability[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(6):508-511.
[10]	Shimizu I, Matsuyama Y, Duvivier R, et al. Contextual attributes to promote positive social interdependence in problem-based learning:a focus group study[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2021, 21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02667-y pmid: 33879160
[11]	杨莉萍, 亓立东, 张博. 质性研究中的资料饱和及其判定[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3):511-521. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00511
	Yang LP, Qi LD, Zhang B. Concepts and evaluation of satura-tion in qualitative research[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2022, 30(3):511-521. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00511
[12]	赵玲, 曾颖, 廖力, 等. 本科护生同理心和人际沟通对人文关怀能力影响的路径分析[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(16):2759-2762.
	Zhao L, Zeng Y, Liao L, et al. Path analysis of the impact of empathy and interpersonal communication on humanistic care ability among undergraduate nursing students[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2019, 33(16):2759-2762.
[13]	黄琼蕾, 宋江艳, 张俊贤, 等. 护理本科生人文关怀教学方案的构建及在护理综合实训课程中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(10):1203-1209.
	Huang QL, Song JY, Zhang JX, et al. Construction of humani-stic caring teaching programme for nursing undergraduates and its application in the Comprehensive Nursing Training course[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2025, 22(10):1203-1209.
[14]	Van Nguyen T, Liu HE. Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses:a cross-sectional study[J]. Nurs Open, 2021, 8(4):1970-1980. doi: 10.1002/nop2.v8.4
[15]	黎雪梅. 护士人文关怀行为影响因素及作用机制研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2021.
	Li XM. Study on the mechanism of influencing factors of nurses’ humanistic care behavior[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Univer-sity, 2021.
[16]	庞冰, 王秀红, 王芸芸, 等. 虚拟仿真实验教学评价的现状及对护理教育的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(2):164-168.
	Pang B, Wang XH, Wang YY, et al. Review of the teaching evaluation of virtual simulation experiment teaching and its implications to nursing education[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2023, 20(2):164-168.
[17]	柳文慧, 闫荣, 林雨婷, 等. 肿瘤科护士人文关怀能力的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2023, 29(36):4945-4952.
	Liu WH, Yan R, Lin YT, et al. Latent profile analysis and influencing factors of humanistic care ability among oncology nurses[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2023, 29(36):4945-4952.

基于设计思维模型的健康评估本科课程实验教学改革与评价研究

Implementation and evaluation of experimental teaching in Health Assessment Courses based on design thinking

HTML阅读

PDF下载

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	文靖, 杨智慧, 闭晓君, 林劲秋, 赵倩倩, 张萍, 张立力. 基于人工智能技术的健康评估教学平台的构建与初步应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2026, 23(2): 133-139.
[2]	沈洁淼, 羊洋, 梁玮, 杨如美, 许勤. 本科护理信息学课程设计及教学实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(9): 1077-1082.
[3]	任羽雯, 周云仙, 王莹. 本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案的构建与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(9): 1083-1090.
[4]	张楠, 王晶晶, 蔺婧, 高燕, 从继妍, 王岚. 多器官功能障碍综合征护理虚拟仿真实验教学项目的构建与应用效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(7): 802-807.
[5]	闫旭, 张曼, 徐娜娜, 万巧琴. 老年人跌倒风险评估虚拟仿真护理教学平台的构建与实现[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(6): 693-698.
[6]	赵思奇, 杨凤娟, 李妍, 李宇杰, 齐伟静. 真实性学习在人文护理综合能力训练课程设计与教学实践中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(5): 535-540.
[7]	侯朝铭, 高静, 吴晨曦, 徐然, 杨静, 柏丁兮. 多路径交互式传染病护理虚拟仿真实验系统的设计与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(3): 261-265.
[8]	裴先波, 周芙玲, 黄婷婷. 急性白血病患者护理虚拟仿真实验教学项目的设计与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(3): 266-271.
[9]	路佳慧, 顾玲玲, 文稀, 李惠玲. 本科护理人文关怀课程的设计与教学实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(3): 288-293.
[10]	张立力, 朱本翔, 赵倩倩, 嵇艳, 岳彤, 李静, 陈华, 孙玉梅, 董超群, 孙宏玉. 全生命周期理念下本科护理人文关怀课程教学实践效果研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(2): 171-176.
[11]	姚远远, 程雪红, 杨娅娟, 张秀梅, 朱读伟, 任春霞. 护理实习生人文关怀能力现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(2): 198-203.
[12]	张志佳, 叶琦琦, 刘春艳, 黄绮华. 进阶式叙事教学在本科妇产科护理学课程中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(10): 1185-1190.
[13]	李林飞, 苟贤娟, 杨柳, 何婧, 任旭, 陈美. 急危重症护理学实验课程思政的教学设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(10): 1197-1202.
[14]	黄琼蕾, 宋江艳, 张俊贤, 赵晓婷, 刘敏, 唐瑭, 李惠萍. 护理本科生人文关怀教学方案的构建及在护理综合实训课程中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(10): 1203-1209.
[15]	罗维, 金晓燕, 侯罗娅, 李珂, 徐蔚然, 尚少梅. 基于扩展现实技术的护理虚拟仿真实验教学资源的开发与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(1): 21-26.