中华护理教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 114-118.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.01.022
收稿日期:
2022-01-26
出版日期:
2023-01-15
发布日期:
2023-01-17
通讯作者:
高钰琳
作者简介:
马玥:女,硕士,讲师,E-mail:基金资助:
MA Yue(),ZHAI Huimin,GAO Yulin()
Received:
2022-01-26
Online:
2023-01-15
Published:
2023-01-17
Contact:
Yulin GAO
摘要:
该文通过文献回顾,对护理专业学生在课堂教学、实验教学与临床教学环境中的个体层面与群体层面的学习心理安全感特点、主要影响因素与改善措施进行综述。教育者在院校教学中应注重增强教学设置的吸引性、保护学生自尊、注重观察学生状态调整教学进度、给予正向反馈;在临床教学中应侧重提升综合护理能力、弱化等级差异影响、巩固专业精神塑造的方式来增强学生的学习心理安全感。
马玥,翟惠敏,高钰琳. 护理专业学生学习心理安全感的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(1): 114-118.
MA Yue,ZHAI Huimin,GAO Yulin. A review of research in the learning psychological safety of nursing students[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(1): 114-118.
[1] | 曾芳. 国内近20年课堂安全感研究述评[J]. 教学研究, 2018, 41(5):91-97. |
[2] | 刘军. 基于心理健康教育的大学生心理安全建设策略分析:评《大学生心理健康教育:积极心理学的运用》[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3):198. |
[3] | 孟子明. 大学生压力、心理弹性与心理安全感的关系研究[D]. 南宁: 广西师范学院, 2017. |
[4] | Kostovich CT, O’Rourke J, Stephen LA. Establishing psychological safety in simulation:faculty perceptions[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 91:104468. |
[5] |
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Adm Sci Q, 1999, 44(2):350-383.
doi: 10.2307/2666999 |
[6] |
Côté-Lussier C, Fitzpatrick C. Feelings of safety at school,socioe-motional functioning,and classroom engagement[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2016, 58(5):543-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.01.003 pmid: 26976149 |
[7] |
Turner S, Harder N. Psychological safe environment:a concept analysis[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2018, 18:47-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.02.004 |
[8] | McClintock AH, Fainstad TL, Jauregui J. Clinician teacher as leader:creating psychological safety in the clinical learning environment for medical students[J]. Acad Med, 2022,Publish Ahead of Print. |
[9] | Park JE, Kim JH. Nursing students’ psychological safety in high fidelity simulations:development of a new scale for psychometric evaluation[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 105:105017. |
[10] | 李金玲, 汪凤麟. 在线课堂学生学习注意力提升策略研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2021(13):22-26. |
Li JL, Wang FL. Research on strategies of improving students’ learning attention in online classroom[J]. Chin J ICT Educ, 2021(13):22-26. | |
[11] | 黄琼, 周仁来. 中国学生考试焦虑的发展趋势:纵向分析与横向验证[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(1):113-118. |
Huang Q, Zhou RL. The development of test anxiety in Chinese students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2019, 27(1):113-118. | |
[12] | 李英琦. 线上线下混合式课程个性化学习支持策略研究:以“信息化教学环境应用”课程为例[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2021. |
[13] | 张月华. 基于翻转课堂的合作学习组织策略研究[D]. 南充: 西华师范大学, 2019. |
Zhang YH. Research on cooperative learning organization stra-tegy based on flipped classroom[D]. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2019. | |
[14] | Papageorgi I. Thorndike’s law of effect[M]. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2018. |
[15] |
Rafi A, Ansar A, Sami MA. The implication of positive reinforcement strategy in dealing with disruptive behaviour in the classroom:a scoping review[J]. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College, 2020, 24(2):173-179
doi: 10.37939/jrmc.v24i2.1190 |
[16] |
Roh YS, Jang KI, Issenberg SB. Nursing students’ perceptions of simulation design features and learning outcomes:the me-diating effect of psychological safety[J]. Collegian, 2021, 28(2):184-189.
doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2020.06.007 |
[17] | Kang SJ, Min HY. Psychological safety in nursing simulation[J]. Nurse Educ, 2019, 44(2):E6-E9. |
[18] |
Tumala RB, Almazan J, Alabdulaziz H, et al. Assessment of nurs-ing students perceptions of their training hospital’s infection prevention climate:a multi-university study in Saudi Arabia[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019, 81:72-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.003 |
[19] |
Laing PAF, Harrison BJ. Safety learning and the Pavlovian conditioned inhibition of fear in humans:current state and future directions[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2021, 127:659-674.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.014 |
[20] | 化得福. 论罗杰斯的人本主义教育思想[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 42(4):152-155. |
[21] |
Hodges LC. Contemporary issues in group learning in undergraduate science classrooms:a perspective from student engagement[J]. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2018, 17(2):es3.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-11-0239 |
[22] |
Xie RY, Jiang JZ, Yue LK, et al. Under psychological safety climate:the beneficial effects of teacher-student conflict[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(15):9300.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159300 |
[23] | Park JE, Kim JH. Nursing students’ experiences of psychological safety in simulation education:a qualitative study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2021, 55:103163. |
[24] | 管静, 金晓燕, 董旭, 等. 模拟教学中护理教师实施引导性反馈的现况调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(11):965-972. |
Guan J, Jin XY, Dong X, et al. A survey of debriefing used in simulation teaching by nursing teachers[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2021, 18(11):965-972. | |
[25] |
Torralba KD, Jose D, Byrne J. Psychological safety,the hidden curriculum,and ambiguity in medicine[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2020, 39(3):667-671.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04889-4 pmid: 31902031 |
[26] |
Uhlig PN, Doll J, Brandon K, et al. Interprofessional practice and education in clinical learning environments:frontlines perspective[J]. Acad Med, 2018, 93(10):1441-1444.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002371 pmid: 30024477 |
[27] | Ghai A, Tandon U. Integrating gamification and instructional design to enhance usability of online learning[J]. Educ Inf Technol, 2022:1-20. |
[28] | 罗冰燕. 人本主义视角下心理课堂安全氛围的构建[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2020(4):23-24,27. |
[29] |
Reierson IÅ, Haukedal TA, Hedeman H, et al. Structured debriefing:what difference does it make?[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2017, 25:104-110.
doi: S1471-5953(16)30159-7 pmid: 28577417 |
[30] |
Roze des Ordons AL, Cheng A, Lockyer J, et al. Approaches to interpersonal conflict in simulation debriefings:a qualitative study[J]. Med Educ, 2021, 55(11):1284-1296.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14595 |
[31] |
Maweni RM, Foley RW, Lupi M, et al. Improving safety for medical students and patients during medical electives-a novel simulation-based course[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2019, 188(3):1033-1045.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1919-6 |
[32] |
Dokal K, Rampes S, Mukhammadaminov A, et al. Reducing the perceived power gap:a practical way to achieve psychological safety in undergraduate education[J]. Med Educ, 2020, 54(10):963.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14210 |
[33] |
Johnson CE, Keating JL, Molloy EK. Psychological safety in feedback:what does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it?[J]. Med Educ, 2020, 54(6):559-570.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14154 |
[34] |
Ridley CH, Al-Hammadi N, Maniar HS, et al. Building a collaborative culture:focus on psychological safety and error reporting[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 111(2):683-689.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.152 pmid: 32721456 |
[35] | 史瑞芬. 论“课程思政”视阈下的护理专业课程教学改革[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(8):586-590. |
Shi RF. Teaching reform of nursing specialty from the perspective of “Ideological and Political Theory Education”[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2019, 16(8):586-590. |
[1] | 杨智慧, 李兴雯, 闭晓君, 林劲秋, 赵倩倩, 刘素婷, 罗园园, 张立力. 健康评估课程知识图谱的构建及初步应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1035-1040. |
[2] | 林丹, 张艺雄, 孙蓉, 柏亚妹, 张薛晴, 宋玉磊. 赛教融合视角下临床护理技能综合实训教学方案的设计与实践效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1088-1092. |
[3] | 庄嘉元, 申玲, 王珠珠, 胡荣, 张妍燕, 王艳, 陈晓华, 刘晓如. 社区护理学课程思政教学设计与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1093-1098. |
[4] | 朱姝芹, 许勤, 方颖, 丁亚萍, 陈明霞, 羊洋, 李现文, 嵇艳, 李维颖, 唐慧婷, 崔焱. 护理学国家级一流本科课程分类建设的实践与成效[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 919-925. |
[5] | 李淑敏, 魏征新, 尚少梅, 侯淑肖. 护理硕士专业学位研究生培养现状及发展建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 962-967. |
[6] | 程侣, 程悦, 李艳. 三步商议模型在医患共享决策中的研究进展及护理启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 1006-1011. |
[7] | 凌喆懿, 曹梅娟, 李芳, 陈琦. 基础照护概念框架的应用研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 1012-1017. |
[8] | 庄嘉元, 申玲, 胡荣, 王珠珠, 王艳. 社区护理学国家级线下一流本科课程的教学设计与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 926-931. |
[9] | 陶琳, 易银萍, 蒋秋焕, 张红梅, 李黎明, 荆婵, 杜晓宁. 营养支持专科护士临床教学基地建设的探索[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 801-806. |
[10] | 刘于, 高丽佳, 张文艳, 于明峰, 文佳祺, 曾铁英. 自适应学习在护理教育中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 892-896. |
[11] | 袁晓玲, 章雅青. 护患沟通学课程教学创新与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 812-817. |
[12] | 蔡雨廷, 徐玉梅. 护理学硕士研究生科研伦理知信行现状及培训需求调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 818-821. |
[13] | 石嫣, 段志光. 基于文献计量分析的护理人文教育视域思考[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 645-651. |
[14] | 罗雅文, 李卡, 卿平, 黄雷, 魏利琴, 刘艳, 黄浩, 张凤英. 人文护理学课程虚拟教研室建设与探索[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 658-661. |
[15] | 韦帅芳, 李峥. 质量—关怀模型在人文关怀护理中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 680-685. |
|