上海市护理硕士专业学位论文基本要求与评价体系的构建

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.05.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的构建上海市护理硕士专业学位论文的基本要求与评价体系。方法邀请上海市各院校护理领域资深研究生导师和研究生教育专家参与专家讨论会,采用名义群体法构建上海市护理硕士专业学位研究生学位论文的基本要求与评价体系,并在征求培养单位研究生导师意见后对评价体系进行完善。结果护理硕士专业学位论文的质量构成包括研究质量与写作质量,根据其培养目标要求,学位论文类型包括研究报告类论文与病例分析类论文两种形式。学位论文的评价体系主要包括选题、应用性、创新性、科学性和规范性5个评价指标,并确定了相应权重为20%、20%、15%、25%、20%。结论护理硕士专业学位论文评价体系提炼了学位论文的评价指标与评价要素,并设置了相应权重,为客观全面地评价护理硕士专业学位研究生的学位论文提供了参考依据,规范护理硕士专业学位研究生的培养。

关键词: 教育,护理,研究生, 教育考核, 学位论文, 护理硕士专业学位, 评价体系

Abstract:

Objective To develop the thesis evaluation system for master of nursing specialist（MNS） in Shanghai. Methods Senior nursing experts and management experts in graduate education from universities or hospitals in Shanghai were invited to participate in the expert consultation meetings. Using nominal group technique（NGT）,the basic requirements and evaluation system of thesis for MNS in Shanghai were jointly discussed. The evaluation system was final revised after calling for comments from supervisors in MNS program of universities. Results The quality evaluation system of thesis for MNS included research quality and writing quality. According to the education objectives of MNS,two types of theses are basically confirmed,including research report and case（series） analysis. The evaluation system of thesis mainly included the topic selection in specialty,application,innovation,scientific attributes,and standardization,with the corresponding weights being 20%,20%,15%,25%,and 20%. Conclusion The thesis evaluation system for MNS refine the elements of evaluation indexes with corresponding weights,which will provide a reference for the objective and comprehensive evaluation of their thesis,and standardize the training of MNS.

Key words: Education,Nursing,Graduate, Educational Measurement, Academic Dissertations, Master of nursing specialist, Evaluation System

贾守梅,胡雁,张玉侠,吴蓓雯,杨艳,施雁,周兰姝,张翠娣,姜友芬,吴鸿翔,葛向煜. 上海市护理硕士专业学位论文基本要求与评价体系的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(5): 399-405.

JIA Shou-mei,HU Yan,ZHANG Yu-xia,WU Bei-wen,YANG Yan,SHI Yan,ZHOU Lan-shu,ZHANG Cui-di,JIANG You-fen,WU Hong-xiang,GE Xiang-yu danw. The basic requirements and evaluation system for academic dissertation of master of nursing specialist（MNS） in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2022, 19(5): 399-405.

图/表 3

参考文献 15

[1]	张艳, 姜安丽. 护理学“学科”概念及其内涵分析[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2012, 27(23):2184-2186.
[2]	国务院学位委员会. 关于印发金融硕士等19种专业学位设置方案的通知[EB/OL]. [2011-11-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/201005/t20100513_92739.html.
[3]	张亚云, 王明明, 孙铮. 我国护理学专业学位研究生教育现状的文献计量分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(15):94-96.
	Zhang YY, Wang MM, Sun Z. Bibliometric analysis on master of nursing specialist education in China[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016, 31(15):94-96.
[4]	曹熙, 郭红霞, 李继平. 护理硕士研究生专业学位与科学学位培养区别的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(16):13-17.
	Cao X, Guo HX, Li JP. Development difference between professional master degree and academic master degree in nursing:a qualitative research[J]. J Nurs(China), 2017, 24(16):13-17.
[5]	国务院学位委员会第六届学科评议组. 一级学科博士、硕士学位基本要求[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014.
[6]	全国专业学位研究生教育指导委员会. 专业学位类别(领域)博士、硕士学位基本要求[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
[7]	上海市学位委员会办公室. 上海市硕士专业学位论文基本要求和评价指标体系(2017年)[EB/OL]. [2017-05-10]. https://yjsy.shutcm.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/ea/33/f11a02c3401e939fff9d6de08a11/b179d086-bffc-4e48-b992-41187345a8e0.pdf.
[8]	全国专业学位研究生教育指导委员会. 护理硕士专业学位研究生指导性培养方案[EB/OL]. [2021-11-15]. http://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/gjjl/szfa/hlss/xgjs/275922.shtml.
[9]	赵青, 嵇艳, 丁亚萍, 等. 我国护理专业学位硕士研究生学位论文的文献计量分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2018, 35(9):691-694.
	Zhao Q, Ji Y, Ding YP, et al. Bibliometric analysis of master’s theses in nursing in China[J]. Chin Heal Serv Manag, 2018, 35(9):691-694.
[10]	程姗姗, 赵秋利, 仰曙芬, 等. 护理学硕士研究生学位论文评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(1):10-13.
	Cheng SS, Zhao QL, Yang SF, et al. Construction of an indicator system for evaluating quality of master thesis in nursing[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016, 31(1):10-13.
[11]	张莉, 王红红. 基于聚类分析探讨护理学硕士研究生学位论文选题热点[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2019, 36(1):6-10,59.
	Zhang L, Wang HH. The thesis topic selection of nursing mas-ter degree based on cluster analysis[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2019, 36(1):6-10,59.
[12]	Madden L, Bojko MJ, Farnum S, et al. Using nominal group technique among clinical providers to identify barriers and prioritize solutions to scaling up opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine[J]. Int J Drug Policy, 2017, 49:48-53. doi: S0955-3959(17)30239-6 pmid: 28957756
[13]	王思婷, 赵青, 李现文. 近5年我国护理硕士专业学位论文研究状况分析[J]. 全科护理, 2019, 17(9):1113-1115.
[14]	周英凤, 顾莺, 胡雁, 等. JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具-病例报告及病例系列的质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(4):310-312.
	Zhou YF, Gu Y, Hu Y, et al. JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center about different types of research Quality Evaluation Tool:Case Report and Case Series Quality Evaluation[J]. J Nurses Train, 2018, 33(4):310-312.
[15]	徐聆, 尹雨晴, 张洁, 等. 从高校护理硕士学位论文看护理科研伦理现状[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(10):1428-1431.