产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.03.016

中华护理教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 270-274.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.03.016

产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验

李雯(),张艳,杨晓伟,姜文彬,宫慧,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣,魏丽丽()

266000 青岛市青岛大学护理学院（李雯,宫慧,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣）;青岛大学附属医院护理部（张艳,姜文彬,魏丽丽）;烟台毓璜顶医院产科（杨晓伟）

收稿日期:2020-08-06 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-03-25
通讯作者: 魏丽丽
作者简介:李雯：女,本科（硕士在读）,护士,E-mail： 945337035@qq.com
基金资助:
青岛市民生科技计划项目(19-6-1-55-nsh)

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form

LI Wen(),ZHANG Yan,YANG Xiao-wei,JIANG Wen-bin,GONG Hui,LÜ Bo-han,ZOU Yu-jiao,WEI Li-li()

Received:2020-08-06 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-03-25
Contact: Li-li WEI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化产妇出院后应对困难量表（Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form）,并检验中文版量表的信效度,为我国产妇出院后应对困难情况的评估提供科学的测量工具。方法对量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适以及预调查,确定中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表的条目,然后对青岛市的200例产妇进行问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表共保留10个条目,量表水平和条目水平的内容效度指数均为1,探索性因子分析共提取1个公因子,累计方差贡献率达81.627%;中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.974,折半信度为0.968,重测信度为0.971。结论中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表具有良好的信度、效度,可用于我国产妇出院后应对困难情况的评价。

关键词: 产妇, 出院后应对困难, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form and test its reliability and validity. Methods After translation,back translation,cultural adjustment and preliminary assessment on the scale,the Chinese version of the scale was finalized. Then the questionnaire was distributed to 200 pregnant women in Qingdao to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the scale included 10 items.The scale-level content validity index and the item-level content validity index were both 1. One factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 81.627%. the Chinese version of the scale had a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.974,the half-reliability of 0.968,and the retest reliability of 0.971. Conclusion The Chinese version of the scale has good reliability and validity,and can be applied to evaluate the coping difficulties of Chinese women after discharge.

Key words: Postpartum mother, Post-discharge coping difficulty, Reliability, Validity

李雯,张艳,杨晓伟,姜文彬,宫慧,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣,魏丽丽. 产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(3): 270-274.

LI Wen,ZHANG Yan,YANG Xiao-wei,JIANG Wen-bin,GONG Hui,LÜ Bo-han,ZOU Yu-jiao,WEI Li-li. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(3): 270-274.

图/表 1

参考文献 13

[1]	谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 256-264.
	Xie X, Gou WL. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 8th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2013: 256-264.
[2]	孙丽媛, 杜彩素, 苏敏, 等. 社会支持、家庭功能与初产妇产褥期生命质量的关系研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017,33(5):358-361.
	Sun LY, Du CS, Su M, et al. Study on the relationship between social support,family function and quality of life of primipara during puerperium[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2017,33(5):358-361.
[3]	宿茹, 潘桃红, 孙艳, 等. 吉林市月嫂行业需求现状调查分析[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2018,39(2):108-109.
	Su R, Pan TH, Sun Y, et al. Investigation and analysis on the current situation of the demand of the month wife industry in Jilin city[J]. J Jilin Med Univ, 2018,39(2):108-109.
[4]	黄文娟, 颜艺鹭, 胡蓉芳. 福州市家庭母婴护理员工作现状及培训需求调查[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020,55(1):118-122.
	Huang WJ, Yan YL, Hu RF. Investigation on occupational status and training demand of family maternal and infant care providers in Fuzhou[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020,55(1):118-122.
[5]	Meky HK, Shaaban MM, Ahmed MR, et al. Prevalence of postpartum depression regarding mode of delivery:a cross-sectional study[J]. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020,33(19):3300-3307. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1571572 pmid: 30704328
[6]	Martínez-Galiano J, Hernández-Martínez A, Rodríguez-Almagro J, et al. Women’s quality of life at 6 weeks postpartum:influence of the discomfort present in the puerperium[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Heal, 2019,16(2):253.
[7]	Opper K, Beiler J, Yakusheva O, et al. Effects of implementing a health team communication redesign on hospital readmissions within 30 days[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2019,16(2):121-130. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12350 pmid: 30919571
[8]	Weiss ME, Lokken L. Predictors and outcomes of postpartum mothers’ perceptions of readiness for discharge after birth[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2009,38(4):406-417. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01040.x pmid: 19614876
[9]	Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[M]. Boston:Allyn and Bacon, 1980: 389-444.
[10]	Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, et al. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires[J]. Qual Life Res, 2015,24(1):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2 pmid: 25008261
[11]	郭金玉, 李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012,47(3):283-285.
	Guo JY, Li Z. The introduction process of scale and its evaluation standards[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2012,47(3):283-285.
[12]	孙振球, 徐勇勇, 梁维君, 等. 医学统计学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 568-576.
	Sun ZQ, Xu YY, Liang WJ, et al. Medical statistics[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2015: 568-576.
[13]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018.
	Wu ML. Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis：operation and application of SPSS[M]. Chongqing：Publishing House of Chongqing University,2018.

[1]	张紫莹, 丁雯, 王茹, 曾美玲, 潘婷, 蒙浩莹. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者药物素养量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 993-999.
[2]	张学颖, 张晓翠, 尹雪梅, 夏欣华, 王莹, 王蓓, 朱红. 危重症新生儿医源性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 731-737.
[3]	高肖, 魏丽丽, 周海清, 宫慧, 孙亚茹, 谷如婷. 多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 580-586.
[4]	李岩, 周晶, 徐洪娇, 樊玉霞, 李娜, 刘美红, 蔺晶. 精神科治疗性关系评估量表-护士版的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 473-477.
[5]	马嫔, 张广意, 李海霞, 张燕, 于慧, 米光丽. 高龄初产妇妊娠晚期症状群识别及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 237-244.
[6]	赵冰悦, 徐钦, 王晓娟, 黄珑, 张钰红, 胡蓉芳. 数字健康素养量表的汉化、修订及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(1): 89-95.
[7]	戴美玲, 冯瑶, 张帆, 陈莹. 临床模拟学习沉浸量表的汉化及其在护理专业学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 946-950.
[8]	赵新爽,刘霖,张洛灵,桂莉. 绝经后女性骨质疏松症患者生活质量问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(6): 740-744.
[9]	张淑, 李宏, 周松, 林文婕, 赵静, 高巨. 护患治疗性沟通量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(5): 589-593.
[10]	邵李姣, 王俊霞, 吴田瑞, 赵煜华, 葛淑怡. 临床护士反思能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 462-466.
[11]	张萌, 余立平, 孟宪梅. 卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 474-479.
[12]	王雪琪, 荆晓雷, 徐昊, 庄红霞, 李娟, 刘贤清. 神经系统评估能力量表的汉化及在神经科护士中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 323-327.
[13]	黄倩, 徐慧萍, 刘延锦, 张艳, 王彦艳, 郭园丽, 蔡立柏, 郭丽娜, 李慧景. 社区老年人肌少症防控知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(2): 205-209.
[14]	黄艳芳, 郭声敏, 李翠, 夏娇, 孙鸿燕, 李雨昕. 标准预防措施问卷的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(12): 1481-1486.
[15]	贾淑贤, 吕婷婷, 焦琳琳, 冯亚新, 张京丽, 李娅, 李琳琳, 杨春玲. 心血管内科护士临床急救能力问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(11): 1342-1346.

产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form

HTML阅读

PDF下载

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10