“互联网+”集中群组干预模式在孕晚期初产妇中的应用研究

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.08.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨“互联网+”集中群组干预模式（远程团体产前教育模式）对孕晚期初产妇孕产期心理的影响。方法招募120例定期在院胎心监护室检查的孕晚期初产妇，随机分为试验组（n=60）与对照组（n=60），两组均给予医院常规健康教育（每次产前检查时的医护宣教、助产士门诊健康宣教等），在此基础上，对照组给予孕妇学校的线下孕晚期课程；试验组则给予以孕晚期保健知识、分娩应对、临产指导、产后护理为核心内容的“互联网+”集中群组保健模式的干预。试验组59例初产妇、对照组57例初产妇完成了研究。比较干预前后两组初产妇的妊娠压力及分娩期望。结果干预后，试验组的妊娠压力总均分为0.53（0.26，0.70），对照组的为0.70（0.35，1.13），差异有统计学意义（Z=2.233，P=0.026）；试验组的医疗环境、配偶支持因子得分高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论运用“互联网+”集中群组干预模式对孕晚期初产妇进行远程教育，能降低孕妇的产前妊娠压力，提高其对医疗环境与配偶支持的分娩期望，是线下健康教育的有益补充。

关键词: 孕妇, 同侪集群, 健康教育, 教育, 远程

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of "Internet+" Centering Pregnancy health care model in late pregnancy（remote group prenatal education model） on the psychological condition of primiparas during pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Methods A total of 120 primiparous women in late pregnancy who were regularly examined in the hospital’s fetal heart monitoring unit were randomly divided into the experimental group（n=60） and the control group（n=60）. Both groups were given routine health education（medical and nursing education at each antenatal check-up，midwife outpatient health education，etc.）. In addition to the routine care，the control group was given offline late pregnancy courses at the maternity school，while the experimental group was given the "Internet+" Centering Pregnancy health care model intervention，which focused on late pregnancy health care knowledge，coping with labor，professional guidance and postnatal care. In the end，59 cases in the experimental group and 57 cases in the contral group completed the intervention. Pregnancy Pressure Scale（PPS） and Childbirth Expectation Question-naire（CEQ） were employed to compare the difference between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results After the intervention，the score on PPS were 0.53（0.26，0.70） and 0.70（0.35，1.13） in the experimental and control groups，respectively，which difference got statistically significant（Z=2.233，P=0.026）. The mean scores for the factors of spousal support and medical environment in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Conclusion The application of the "Internet+" Centering Pregnancy health care model in late pregnancy to provide distance education for primiparous mothers can reduce prenatal pregnancy stress of pregnant women and increase their expectation of a medical environment and spousal support for delivery. Such model is a beneficial supplement to offline health education.

Key words: Pregnant Women, Peer Group, Health Education, Education, Distance

胡颖, 周明芳, 陈世华, 钟俊雅, 范尧, 俞丽丽, 大城昌平, 顾寿智. “互联网+”集中群组干预模式在孕晚期初产妇中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 957-962.

HU Ying, ZHOU Mingfang, CHEN Shihua, ZHONG Junya, FAN Yao, YU Lili, Shohei Ohgi, GU Shouzhi. Study on the application of "Internet +" Centering Pregnancy health care model in late pregnancy of primiparas[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(8): 957-962.

图/表 3

参考文献 14

[1]	余昀. “互联网”+“集中群组孕期保健”管理模式的可行性研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2020.
	Yu Y. Health management model of“Internet”+“centering pregnancy”:a feasibility study[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2020.
[2]	Doaltabadi Z, Amiri-Farahani L. The effect of in-person and virtual prenatal care education of the spouses of primiparous women on the father and mother’s attachment to infant:a quasi-experimental and controlled study[J]. Trials, 2021, 22(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05559-0 pmid: 34479602
[3]	戴亚端, 林丽媛, 郭进华, 等. 团体产前保健联合线上孕妇学校在高龄初产妇健康教育中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9):803-808.
	Dai YD, Lin LY, Guo JH, et al. Application of the group prenatal care combined with pregnant women school for high-aged primiparous women[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(9):803-808.
[4]	胡颖, 周明芳, 范尧, 等. 孕晚期“互联网+”集中群组化保健课程的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9):855-859.
	Hu Y, Zhou MF, Fan Y, et al. Construction of “Internet+” centering pregnancy health care course in late pregnancy[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2021, 18(9):855-859.
[5]	Rising SS. Centering pregnancy:an interdisciplinary model of empowerment[J]. J Nurse Midwifery, 1998, 43(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(97)00117-1 pmid: 9489291
[6]	郭利洁. 初产妇及其配偶分娩期望调查分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
	Guo LJ. Investigation of childbirth expectations in primiparas and their spouses[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2016.
[7]	常帅. 妊娠晚期妇女妊娠压力、领悟社会支持与抑郁倾向的关系:自我效能和自尊中介作用的研究[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2018.
	Chang S. The association between pregnancy pressure,preceived social support and depressive symptoms among women in late pregnancy:the mediating role of self-efficacy and self-esteem[D]. Shenyang: China Medical University, 2018.
[8]	任广秀, 杨富国, 刘志梅, 等. 初产妇及其配偶产前健康教育获益现状及影响因素调查[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(4):69-71.
	Ren GX, Yang FG, Liu ZM, et al. Research on primiparous couples’ perceived benefits from prenatal health education and the influencing factors[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2018, 33(4):69-71.
[9]	Chen CH. Revision and validation of a scale to assess pregnancy stress[J]. J Nurs Res, 2015, 23(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000047
[10]	李丹, 吴苹, 刘俊升. 孕妇妊娠压力量表的信效度初步检验[J]. 心理研究, 2013, 6(2):64-69.
	Li D, Wu P, Liu JS. Reliability and validity of pregnancy stress rating scale[J]. Psychol Res, 2013, 6(2):64-69.
[11]	Gupton A, Beaton J, Sloan J, et al. The development of a scale to measure childbirth expectations[J]. Revue Can De Recherche En Sci Infirm, 1991, 23(2):35-47.
[12]	Kao BC, Gau ML, Wu SF, et al. A comparative study of expectant parents ’childbirth expectations[J]. J Nurs Res, 2004, 12(3):191-202.
[13]	Aksoy Derya Y, Altiparmak S, AkÇa E, et al. Pregnancy and birth planning during COVID-19:the effects of tele-education offered to pregnant women on prenatal distress and pregnancy-related anxiety[J]. Midwifery, 2021, 92:102877. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102877
[14]	周临, 张晶, 陈丹丹, 等. 以家庭为中心的群组式孕期保健模式的应用及效果研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(3):401-405. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.03.015
	Zhou L, Zhang J, Chen DD, et al. The application and effects of family-centered group prenatal care model[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(3):401-405. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.03.015

[1]	梁文娜, 乔远静, 李丹丹, 王旭, 夏玉雪, 秦光雅, 冯梦轩. 脚本一致性测试联合有声思维在护理专业教学中的介绍及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 1019-1024.
[2]	马彩虹, 高欢玲, 尚春娥, 李红梅, 杨玉霖, 吕旭晶, 张思苑, 崔彩彩. 棋盘游戏在老年维持性血液透析患者容量管理健康教育中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 901-908.
[3]	孙欣, 旷紫霞, 石章杰, 刘丽萍, 黎海鸥, 龙晴, 王冬华. 护理伦理学课程思政教学实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 931-935.
[4]	赵廷芬, 张莉, 张耕, 崔文, 张秀玲, 刘俏玲. 导师指导风格对护理硕士研究生学习获得感的影响研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 936-939.
[5]	李成, 余小红, 陈红丽, 许勤, 丁亚萍, 李现文. 江苏省30项医学虚拟仿真实验项目课程思政设计及路径优化分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 940-945.
[6]	戴美玲, 冯瑶, 张帆, 陈莹. 临床模拟学习沉浸量表的汉化及其在护理专业学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 946-950.
[7]	彭宇, 沙丽艳, 刘洋, 郭中献. 7E教学模式在外科护理学临床见习教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 951-956.
[8]	王艳, 庄嘉元, 张妍燕, 李军婷. 以团队为基础的学习在护理本科生教学中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 991-996.
[9]	范华美, 杨丽黎, 王锦云. 临床护理教师核心能力测评工具的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 997-1002.
[10]	蔡春凤, 郑双会, 彭夏丽, 刘培书. 模拟前导引在护理教育中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 878-883.
[11]	丁泽宇, 弓伟, 冀璇, 李慧芳. 护理本科生网络学习行为特征聚类及可视化研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 773-779.
[12]	张利, 王茜, 季小梅, 周雪妃, 李敏, 王丽. 康复护理学课程思政教学设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 809-813.
[13]	彭燕霞, 李金娟, 鞠梅. 共情在高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性与亲社会行为间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 819-823.
[14]	董旭婷, 陈晓莉, 李正姐, 施雪晖, 孙敏. 三级甲等医院护理实习生情域能力现况及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 824-828.
[15]	吕亚淋, 郜欣悦, 陈响, 郑子浩, 陈雪梅. 护理本科生职业生涯规划课程研究的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 884-890.