共情在高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性与亲社会行为间的中介效应

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.07.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨共情在高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性和亲社会行为间的中介效应。方法 2022年3月—4月，采用多阶段抽样法选取四川省2所高职院校护理学院766名在读护理专业学生为研究对象，使用中文版伦理敏感性问卷、Jefferson共情量表-护理专业学生版、亲社会倾向量表进行问卷调查。结果 766名高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性、共情、亲社会行为得分分别为（40.31±6.64）分、（101.20±17.73）分、（98.27±15.65）分，三者间均呈正相关（P<0.001）；共情在伦理敏感性和亲社会行为间的中介效应为0.189，占总效应的32.75%。结论共情在高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性和亲社会行为间起部分中介作用，护理教育者可以通过采取有效措施增强高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性和共情能力，从而提升其亲社会行为。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 院校, 卫生职业, 伦理敏感性, 共情, 亲社会行为, 中介效应

Abstract:

Objective To explore the mediating effect of empathy between ethical sensitivity and prosocial behavior in higher vocational college nursing students. Methods Through multistage sampling method，a total of 766 nursing students from two higher vocational colleges in Sichuan province were recruited from March to April 2022. The Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire-Revised Version into Chinese，the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Nursing Student，and the Prosocial Tendencies Measure were employed for assessment. Results The scores of ethical sensitivity，empathy and prosocial behavior among participants were（40.31±6.64），（101.20±17.73） and（98.27±15.65），respectively. There were positive correlations among the three variables（P<0.001）. The mediating effect of empathy between ethical sensitivity and prosocial behavior was 0.189，accounting for 32.75% of the total effect. Conclusion Empathy plays a partial mediating role empathy between ethical sensitivity and prosocial behavior in higher vocational college nursing students. Nursing educators can take effective measures to enhance the ethical sensitivity and empathy for higher vocational college nursing students.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Schools, Health Occupations, Ethical sensitivity, Empathy, Prosocial behavior, Mediating effect

彭燕霞, 李金娟, 鞠梅. 共情在高职护理专业学生伦理敏感性与亲社会行为间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 819-823.

PENG Yanxia, LI Jinjuan, JU Mei. Mediating effect of empathy between ethical sensitivity and prosocial behavior in higher vocational college nursing students[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(7): 819-823.

图/表 2

参考文献 23

[1]	Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL. Handbook of child psychology[M]. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[2]	Feather J, McGillis Hall L, Trbovich P, et al. An integrative review of nurses’ prosocial behaviours contributing to work environment optimization,organizational performance and quality of care[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2018, 26(7):769-781. doi: 10.1111/jonm.2018.26.issue-7
[3]	Lützén K, Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, et al. Developing the concept of moral sensitivity in health care practice[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2006, 13(2):187-196. pmid: 16526152
[4]	Lechasseur K, Caux C, Dollé S, et al. Ethical competence:an integrative review[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2018, 25(6):694-706. doi: 10.1177/0969733016667773 pmid: 27694548
[5]	Chen Q, Su XD, Liu SY, et al. The relationship between moral sensitivity and professional values and ethical decision-making in nursing students[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 105:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105056
[6]	王瑞琦, 陈勤, 徐敏. 护理专业学生共情能力的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(3):279-282.
	Wang RQ, Chen Q, Xu M. A review of empathy in nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(3):279-282.
[7]	陈雪蕾, 于春芳, 李芳, 等. 三甲医院护士伦理敏感性与共情能力的相关性研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(16):1445-1447.
[8]	Daniel Batson C, Shaw LL. Evidence for altruism:toward a pluralism of prosocial motives[J]. Psychol Inq, 1991, 2(2):107-122. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
[9]	张磊. 护理高职生亲社会行为与共情能力的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9):823-826.
	Zhang L. Study on the correlation between prosocial behavior and empathy ability of higher vocational nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2021, 18(9):823-826.
[10]	倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4):378-380.
[11]	Huang FF, Yang Q, Zhang J, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire-revised Chinese version[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2016, 23(7):784-793. pmid: 26002939
[12]	Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance,clinical competence and gender[J]. Med Educ, 2002, 36(6):522-527. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01234.x pmid: 12047665
[13]	邱志军. 湖南省高职护生共情现状的调查研究[D]. 广州: 中山大学, 2010.
	Qiu ZJ. Investigation and study on empathy of nursing students in higher vocational colleges in Hunan Province[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2010.
[14]	Carlo G, Randall BA. The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2002, 31(1):31-44. doi: 10.1023/A:1014033032440
[15]	寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 等. 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1):112-117.
	Kou Y, Hong HF, Tan C, et al. Revisioning prosocial tendencies measure for adolescent[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2007, 23(1):112-117.
[16]	苏向单. 基于叙事教学模式的本科生护理伦理决策能力培训方案构建及应用[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021.
	Su XS. The development and preliminary application of the nursing ethical decision-making ability training program for nursing undergraduates based on narrative teaching mode[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2021.
[17]	岳鑫彦, 王小平, 田金莲, 等. 三级医院护士伦理敏感性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(13):51-55.
	Yue XY, Wang XP, Tian JL, et al. Analysis on status quo and influencing factors of ethical sensitivity among nurses in tertiary hospitals[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2021, 36(13):51-55.
[18]	Tuvesson H, Lützén K. Demographic factors associated with moral sensitivity among nursing students[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2017, 24(7):847-855. doi: 10.1177/0969733015626602 pmid: 26826120
[19]	王向荣, 南亚星, 乔桂圆, 等. 巴林特小组活动对本科护理专业学生共情能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(23):68-70.
[20]	Lee E, Kim Y. The relationship of moral sensitivity and patient safety attitudes with nursing students’ perceptions of disclosure of patient safety incidents:a cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1):e0227585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227585
[21]	Gülnar E, Özveren H, Özden D. The relationship between moral sensitivity and medical errors attitude in nursing students[J]. J Forensic Leg Med, 2020, 73:101981. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101981
[22]	娄方丽, 尚少梅, 田辉. 基于“S-O-R”模式、Heider平衡理论和知信行理论构建癌症病人疼痛管理态度改变研究的理论模型[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(9):1559-1563.
[23]	李如琴, 周进芳, 路璐. 医务人员伦理敏感性问题及对策研究:以儿科医务人员为例[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2022, 35(6):649-653.