教育者专业发展量表的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.08.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的引进、汉化教育者专业发展（the Educators’ Professional Development,EduProDe）量表并检验其信效度。方法采用翻译模型进行量表的直译和回译,通过专家评议及预测试对翻译后的量表进行跨文化调试。2021年5月—6月,采用便利抽样法对杭州市2所三级甲等综合医院的396名临床护理教育者进行调查,评价中文版EduProDe量表的信效度。结果中文版EduProDe量表共包含3个子量表,26个条目,探索性因子分析共提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为79.712%。量表的条目内容效度指数为0.833~1.000,量表内容效度指数为0.974。量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.977,各子量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.964~0.974。量表的重测信度为0.861。结论中文版EduProDe量表具有良好的信效度,适用于评估临床护理教育者的专业发展能力,为制订有针对性的护理教育者专业发展方案提供参考依据。

关键词: 可靠性和有效性, 教育者专业发展量表, 翻译, 临床护理教育者

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Educators’ Professional Development（EduProDe） scale and to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the EduProDe. Methods The Sousa translation model was used for forward and back translation. Cross-cultural adaption of the translated scale was performed through expert consultation and pre-testing. Totally 396 clinical nurse educators from two tertiary general hospitals in Hangzhou were recruited from May 2021 to June 2021 by convenience sampling. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of EduProDe scale were assessed. Results The Chinese version of the EduProDe scale included 3 subscales and 26 items in total. Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 79.712%. The I-CVI were 0.833~1.000 and the S-CVI was 0.974. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.977. Cronbach’s α coefficients of the three sub-scales were 0.964~0.974. The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.861. Conclusion The Chinese version of the EduProDe scale has good reliability and validity,which can be used as a tool to assess clinal nurse educators’ professional development competence,and provide reference for nursing education departments to formulate targeted nursing educator training programs.

Key words: Reliability and Validity, Educators’ professional development scale, Translation, Clinical nurse educator

邢英姿,周一汝,冯金娥,吴黎莉,陈丹丹. 教育者专业发展量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(8): 727-731.

XING Yingzi,ZHOU Yiru,FENG Jine,WU Lili,CHEN Dandan. Translation and reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of the Educators’ Professional Development scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2022, 19(8): 727-731.

图/表 1

参考文献 20

[1]	Brennan J, Olson EL. Advancing the profession:the clinical nurse educator[J]. Nursing, 2018, 48(10):53-54. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000545017.83543.8f pmid: 30256291
[2]	Coates K, Fraser K. A case for collaborative networks for clinical nurse educators[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2014, 34(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.003
[3]	Strickland RJ, O’Leary-Kelley C. Clinical nurse educators’ perceptions of research utilization:barriers and facilitators to change[J]. J Nurses Staff Dev, 2009, 25(4):164-171. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3181ae142b pmid: 19657246
[4]	Huang Hoon C, Mighty J, Roxå T, et al. ‘The danger of a single story:’ a reflection on institutional change,voices,identities,power,and outcomes[J]. Int J Acad Dev, 2019, 24(2):97-108. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2019.1594239
[5]	Arian M, Soleimani M, Oghazian MB. Job satisfaction and the factors affecting satisfaction in nurse educators:a systematic review[J]. J Prof Nurs, 2018, 34(5):389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.07.004
[6]	Dymock D, Tyler M. Towards a more systematic approach to continuing professional development in vocational education and training[J]. Studies in Continuing Education, 2018, 40(2):198-211. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1449102
[7]	McMahon GT. The leadership case for investing in continuing professional development[J]. Acad Med, 2017, 92(8):1075-1077. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001619 pmid: 28248696
[8]	Koskimäki M, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M, et al. Development and testing of the Educators’ Professional Development scale(EduProDe) for the assessment of social and health care educators’ continuing professional development[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 98:104657. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104657
[9]	Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation,adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and user-friendly guideline[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(2):268-274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
[10]	Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity[J]. Nurs Res, 1986, 35(6),382-385. pmid: 3640358
[11]	Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2005.
[12]	Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(24):3186-3191. pmid: 11124735
[13]	DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2007, 39(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
[14]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010:178-183.
[15]	Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2007, 16(2):234-243. pmid: 17239058
[16]	戴海琦, 张锋, 陈雪枫. 心理与教育测量(修订本)[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2007:59-65.
[17]	史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52.
[18]	Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2007, 30(4):459-467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199
[19]	Bagozzi RP. Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis:a further comment[J]. J Consum Res, 1983, 9(4):449-450. doi: 10.1086/208939
[20]	Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research[J]. J Chiropr Med, 2016, 15(2):155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012