基于共识的健康测量工具遴选标准对分娩恐惧量表测量属性的系统评价

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.04.017

Abstract

Abstract:

Objectives To identify the most commonly used instruments measuring fear of childbirth （FOC） and assess risk of bias,measurement properties,and level of evidence based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments （COSMIN） guidelines. Methods PubMed,Scopus,CINAHL,Web of Science,SinoMed,Wanfang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the instruments of measuring FOC from their inception to March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literatures,extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Methodological quality of the studies,quality of measurement properties,and level of evidence were determined using the COSMIN checklist and criteria. Results A total of 27 studies were included,including 5 measurement tools for FDC. The content validity quality of Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire（W-DEQ） was sufficient,and the evidence quality level is low. The structural validity quality was sufficient,and the evidence quality level was intermediate. The internal consistency quality was sufficient,and the evidence quality level was intermediate. The stability quality was sufficient and the evidence quality level was high. The hypothesis testing quality was sufficient and the evidence quality level was high. Conclusion The W-DEQ is recommended to be used in the measurement of childbirth FDC. The quality of the measurement attributes of the other parturition fear scales is still incomplete and needs to be further investigated.

Key words: Parturition, Fear, Questionnaires, Systematic review, Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments

ZHAO Ya-nan,LI Yan,ZHANG Jing,HOU Jia-wen,MA Xi-mei,ZHUANG Si-min,XIAO Guang-hong,WANG Yan-hong. The instruments of measuring fear of childbirth in pregnancy based on COSMIN：a systematic review of psychometric properties[J].Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2022, 19(4): 378-384.

Figures/Tables 3

References 33

[1]	Nilsson C, Hessman E, Sjöblom H, et al. Definitions,measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth:a systematic review[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018,18(1):28.
[2]	Dencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, et al. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth:a systematic review[J]. Women Birth, 2019,32(2):99-111.
[3]	Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ;a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth[J]. J Psychosom Obset Gynaecol, 1998,19(2):84-97.
[4]	危娟, 刘洁英, 张莉芳, 等. 分娩恐惧量表的汉化及信效度检测[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016,31(2):81-83.
	Wei J, Liu JY, Zhang LF, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Childbirth Attitudes Questionnaire[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016,31(2):81-83.
[5]	Wijma K, Alehagen S, Wijma B. Development of the delivery fear scale[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2002,23(2):97-107.
[6]	Haines H, Pallant JF, Karlström A, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample[J]. Midwifery, 2011,27(4):560-567.
[7]	Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1147-1157.
[8]	Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1171-1179.
[9]	Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures:a Delphi study[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1159-1170.
[10]	Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007,60(1):34-42.
[11]	赵雨馨. 我国妊娠妇女分娩恐惧发生情况及影响因素研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2019.
[12]	张明. 孕妇产前分娩恐惧及影响因素的研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016.
	Zhang M. The research of antenatal fear of childbirth and its associated factors in pregnant women[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2016.
[13]	Gourounti K, Kouklaki E, Lykeridou K. Validation of the Child-birth Attitudes Questionnaire in Greek and psychosocial characteristics of pregnant women with fear of childbirth[J]. Women Birth, 2015,28(3):e44-e51.
[14]	Tanglakmankhong K, Perrin NA, Lowe NK. Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory and Childbirth Attitudes Questionnaire:psychometric properties of Thai language versions[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2011,67(1):193-203.
[15]	Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2000,21(4):219-224.
[16]	Shakarami A, Iravani M, Mirghafourvand M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of delivery fear scale (DFS) in Iran[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021,21(1):147.
[17]	Serçekuş P, İsbir GG, İnci FH. Reliability and validity of the delivery fear scale[J]. Dokuz Eylül üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fa-kültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 2017,10(4):179-185.
[18]	Haines HM, Pallant JF, Fenwick J, et al. Identifying women who are afraid of giving birth:a comparison of the fear of birth scale with the WDEQ-A in a large Australian cohort[J]. Sex Reprod Healthc, 2015,6(4):204-210.
[19]	Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Karlström A, et al. Exploring the Fear of Birth Scale in a mixed population of women of childbearing age-a Swedish pilot study[J]. Women Birth, 2018,31(5):407-413.
[20]	Kuipers J, Henrichs J, Evans K. A comparison of the Fear of Childbirth Scale with the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale to identify childbirth-related fear in a sample of Dutch pregnant women:a diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2020,109:103615.
[21]	Wootton BM, Davis E, Moses K, et al. The development and initial validation of the Tokophobia Severity Scale[J]. Clin Psychol, 2020,24(3):267-275.
[22]	刘珊珊, 刘均娥. 北京地区孕妇分娩恐惧现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015,21(9):997-1000.
	Liu SS, Liu JE. Investigation on the status and influencing factors of childbirth fear of pregnant women in Beijing area[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2015,21(9):997-1000.
[23]	Korukcu O, Kukulu K, Firat MZ. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) with pregnant women[J]. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 2012,19(3):193-202.
[24]	Pitel L, Psenkova P, Jones CCG, et al. Validation of the Slovak version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(W-DEQ),version A[J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2020,121(6):415-421.
[25]	Mortazavi F. Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire:an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis[J]. Electron Physician, 2017,9(6):4606-4615.
[26]	Ortega-Cejas C, Roldán-Merino J, Lluch-Canut T, et al. Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the “Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire”(W-DEQ-A)[J]. PLoS One, 2021,16(3):e0248595.
[27]	Takegata M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, et al. Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the Wijma Delivery Ex-pectancy/Experience Questionnaire version A[J]. Nurs Health Sci, 2013,15(3):326-332.
[28]	Andaroon N, Kordi M, Ghasemi M, et al. The validity and re-liability of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(Version A) in primiparous Women in Mashhad,Iran[J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2020,45(2):110-117.
[29]	MoghaddamHosseini V, Makai A, Dweik D, et al. Factor analysis study of the Hungarian translation of Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(version A)[J]. Curr Psy-chol, 2020,39(4):1098-1105.
[30]	Garthus-Niegel S, Størksen HT, Torgersen L, et al. The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire:a factor analy-tic study[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2011,32(3):160-163.
[31]	Khwepeya M, Huang HC, Lee GT, et al. Validation of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire for pregnant women in Malawi:a descriptive,cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020,20(1):455.
[32]	Pallant JF, Haines HM, Green P, et al. Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2016,16(1):361.
[33]	Fenaroli V, Saita E. Fear of childbirth:a contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(W-DEQ)[J]. TPM Test Psy-chom Methodol Appl Psychol, 2013,20(2):131-154.

The instruments of measuring fear of childbirth in pregnancy based on COSMIN：a systematic review of psychometric properties

HTML

PDF(PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	CHEN Xiangjun, HU Fang, TANG Li, TAN Xiaomei. Analysis of reflective practice level and its influencing factors in clinical nurses [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(9): 1120-1125.
[2]	LI Xiaohua, ZHU Hong, YANG Dan, HAO Yufang, LI Xuejing. The influence of role modeling on nursing students’ professional identity：a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(7): 841-848.
[3]	LIU Suxiang, ZHANG Huafang, SHI Yajun, LIU Qingqing, ZHANG Ying, YANG Lili. A systematic review of hypoglycemic fear assessment tools in adult diabetic patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(7): 873-880.
[4]	SUN Yumei, ZHOU Qiang, YE Minghui, SUN Hongyu, ZHAO Guodong. An investigation on the learning approaches of nursing undergraduates in the blended learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(5): 557-561.
[5]	LI Xiumei, ZHANG Hongmei, LI Xiaohan, ZHANG Yali, WU YuanyuanI. Application of family-centered resourcefulness training in peritoneal dialysis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(3): 261-268.
[6]	ZHANG Jian, JING Jie, GAI Yubiao, XUE Xue, LIU Qingwei, WEI Lili, ZHANG Yuchen, LI Zunzhu, SUN Jianhua, LIU Yanyan, LUO Hongbo. Study on the current situation about ICU nurses’ knowledge，attitude and practice of acute skin failure and its influencing factors [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(3): 336-341.
[7]	ZHANG Fan, LIU Tuanhui, XU Zhaoning, LÜ Jingwen, ZHANG Lei, LI Yahong, JIANG Wenhui. The mediating effect of ego-resiliency between perceived stress and occupational commitment in newly graduated nurses [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(2): 159-164.
[8]	BAO Bin, CAO Meijuan, HE Xin, XIE Chunqi, LI Qiang. The current status and influencing factors of ethical sensitivity of nursing students [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(2): 183-188.
[9]	WANG Honglian, XIE Wenjuan, HUANG Hui, LIU Yuyao, YOU Xuelian, CHEN Hui. Translation and validation of the Adaptive Capacity Index for advanced cancer patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(2): 218-223.
[10]	MEI Yongxia,LIU Zhiwei,ZHANG Zhenxiang,WANG Zhengjun,LIN Beilei,CHEN Suyan,ZHAO Zhixin,ZHANG Weihong. Investigation of ideological and political quality in 9 978 nursing students [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(1): 37-41.
[11]	YAN Zhongting, LIANG Yi, WANG Fang, SANG Yuhuan, YUAN Yuan, JU Mei. Chinese version of hypertension self-management assessment tools based on COSMIN guidelines：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(1): 73-80.
[12]	CAI Jianzheng, WANG Haifang, HU Xiuying, MAO Lifen, ZHAO Xiaoqing, QIN Ziyu. Analysis on the characteristics of nurses who suffer from workplace violence repeatedly [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(8): 919-924.
[13]	DONG Xuting, CHEN Xiaoli, LI Zhengjie, SHI Xuehui, SUN Min. Status and influencing factors of nursing interns’ affective domain ability in grade A tertiary hospitals [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(7): 824-828.
[14]	HUANG Jiayi, WU Zhishan, JIANG Liping. Investigation of status and demands of continuous renal replacement therapy training for ICU nurses [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(7): 835-839.
[15]	WANG Fang, QI Juan, CHEN Chunli, CAI Renyan, ZHAO Yang, XIE Lunfang. Investigation on the status of first aid knowledge，beliefs and behaviors of community residents [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(7): 852-856.