ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Chinese Science and Technical Journal Database

Chinese Journal of Nursing Education ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (7): 643-647.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.07.015

• Nursing Education • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties testing of the Chinese version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire

YU Jian(),CHEN Lu,XU Bin,XIE Li-li,FENG Jian-ping,LIN Zheng,XU Jing-jing()   

  • Received:2020-02-24 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-07-24
  • Contact: Jing-jing XU E-mail:yujian_nzy@qq.com;xuhan43@163.com

Abstract:

Objective This study was to translate the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire(MCTQ) into Chinese and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MCTQ. Methods After the translation,re-translation and cultural adjustment of the MCTQ,the Chinese version of MCTQ was obtained. A total of 426 nursing interns were surveyed by the Chinese version of the MCTQ questionnaire. Among them,30 students were retested after 2 weeks. Eight experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the Chinese version of MCTQ. Results Exploratory factor analysis showed that there were 4 factors of the Chinese version of MCTQ, including modeling, coaching, expression exploration, and learning environment. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the overall scale was 0.912. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.862. Its content validity was 0.960. Conclusion The Chinese version of MCTQ has a rigorous theoretical basis and high reliability and validity in the context of Chinese culture. It can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the clinical teaching quality for nursing students.

Key words: Students, Nursing, Reliability, Validity, Clinical teaching