护理教学评价文献热点及趋势分析

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.12.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析护理教学评价文献热点及发展趋势。方法检索中国知网和Web of Science核心合集数据库社会科学引文索引（Social Sciences Citation Index，SSCI）子库中2016年—2024年收录的护理教学评价文献，采用CiteSpace 6.3.R1软件进行发文量及关键词共现、聚类、突现分析。结果共纳入中文文献705篇、英文文献562篇。2016年—2024年，英文文献年发文量整体呈波动上升趋势；中文文献年发文量于2019年升至高点后，呈持续下降趋势，2024年有所回稳。中文文献聚焦教学形式与教学改革评价；英文文献更关注护理素养的培育评价，且评价视角从“以教师为中心”向“以学生为中心”转变。中、英文文献均注重信息化技术赋能护理教学评价，但两者在具体应用与评估重点上存在明显差异。结论我国护理教学评价应涵盖基础知识、专业技能实践及综合素质，以护理实践与最佳证据为驱动，以技术赋能、人文构建、跨界融合为核心；并依托信息技术的进步，及时将评判性思维、人文素养等纳入护理教学评价体系。

关键词: 教育，护理, 教学评价, 热点, 趋势, 文献计量分析

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the research hotspots and development trends in nursing education evaluation literature. Methods Literature on nursing education evaluation published from 2016 to 2024 were retrieved from the CNKI and Web of Science databases. CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software was used to analyze the number of published papers，as well as keyword co-occurrence，clustering，and burst detection. Results A total of 705 Chinese articles and 562 English articles were included. From 2016 to 2024，the annual number of published English literature showed an overall fluctuating upward trend. In contrast，the annual number of published Chinese literature peaked in 2019，followed by a continuous downward trend，and stabilized somewhat in 2024. Chinese literatures focused on educational forms and educational reforms；English literatures paid more attention to the cultivation of nursing competencies，with the evaluation perspective shifting from “teacher-centered” to “student-centered”. Both Chinese and English literatures emphasized the empowerment of information technology in nursing education evaluation，but there were significant differences between the two in specific applications and evaluation priorities. Conclusion Nursing education evaluation in China should cover basic knowledge，professional skill practice，and comprehensive competencies. It should be driven by nursing practice and best evidence，with a core focus on technology empowerment，humanistic cultivation，and interdisciplinary integration. Relying on the advancement of information technology，critical thinking，humanistic literacy，and other elements should be timely incorporated into the nursing education evaluation system.

Key words: Education，Nursing, Education Evaluation, Hotspots, Trends, Bibliometrics Analysis

王维, 朱唯一, 薛美琴, 陈燕. 护理教学评价文献热点及趋势分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(12): 1431-1436.

WANG Wei, ZHU Weiyi, XUE Meiqin, CHEN Yan. Analysis of research hotspots and trends in nursing education evaluation literature[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2025, 22(12): 1431-1436.

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

表3

图2

图3

参考文献 19

[1]	王甲, 龙宝新. 系统思维视角下课堂教学评价的实践反思与路径优化[J]. 中国考试, 2023(12):1-7.
	Wang J, Long BX. Reflection and optimization of classroom teaching evaluation practice from the perspective of systematic thinking[J]. J China Exam, 2023(12):1-7.
[2]	王甲, 龙宝新. 互动仪式链视域下课堂教学评价的困境与破解[J]. 当代教育科学, 2023(4):35-45.
	Wang J, Long BX. Dilemma and solution of classroom teaching evaluation from the perspective of interactive ritual chain[J]. Contemp Educ Sci, 2023(4):35-45.
[3]	陈彤彤, 宣凡馨, 石兰萍. 基于CiteSpace的标准化护理语言研究热点与趋势的可视化分析[J]. 军事护理, 2023, 40(1):61-65.
[4]	陆慧敏, 陈思玮, 张泽勇, 等. 基于CiteSpace可视化软件对我国机器人手术护理研究文献的分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2024, 21(5):128-132.
[5]	李晴, 冯霞, 吴瑶娟, 等. 基于CiteSpace的国内外减重手术护理领域研究现状与热点的可视化分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2024, 30(10):1344-1351.
[6]	周洪宇. 论制定实施国家教育事业发展“十三五” 规划的四个要点[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 19(3):9-11.
[7]	王芸芸, 熊吴燕, 王秀红, 等. 本科护生“老年护理学”社会实践教学学习体验的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14):28-31. doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.14.028
[8]	胡雁, 周英凤, 邢唯杰, 等. 护理学专业学生循证思维的培养[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(10):869-874.
	Hu Y, Zhou YF, Xing WJ, et al. Improving evidence-based thinking for nursing students[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2021, 18(10):869-874.
[9]	Crawford CL, Rondinelli J, Zuniga S, et al. Testing of the nursing evidence-based practice survey[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2020, 17(2):118-128. doi: 10.1111/wvn.v17.2
[10]	王维, 朱唯一, 陈燕, 等. 5E临床教学模式对实习护生学习投入及学习成效影响的实证研究[J]. 军事护理, 2025, 42(3):108-112.
[11]	舒美英, 蔡建国, 董峰. 系统论与学生感知:两种教育质量评价理论的比较研究[J]. 教育评论, 2024(6):77-84.
[12]	Lee H. The rise of ChatGPT:Exploring its potential in medical education[J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2024, 17(5):926-931. doi: 10.1002/ase.v17.5
[13]	Suárez-Araujo CP, García Báez P, Cabrera-León Y, et al. A real-time clinical decision support system,for mild cognitive impairment detection,based on a hybrid neural architecture[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2021, 2021:5545297.
[14]	Dowling M, Shewbridge A, Ryan C, et al. Development and implementation of an online education program on advanced breast cancer for European cancer nurses:ABC4Nurses project:a brief report[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2023, 38(5):1662-1666. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02319-3 pmid: 37336799
[15]	Saab MM, McCarthy M, O’Mahony B, et al. Virtual reality simulation in nursing and midwifery education:a usability study[J]. Comput Inform Nurs, 2023, 41(10):815-824.
[16]	Mäkinen H, Haavisto E, Havola S, et al. Graduating nursing students’ user experiences of the immersive virtual reality simulation in learning-a qualitative descriptive study[J]. Nurs Open, 2023, 10(5):3210-3219. doi: 10.1002/nop2.v10.5
[17]	庞冰, 王秀红, 王丽, 等. 护理专业虚拟仿真实验课程评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9):1052-1059.
	Pang B, Wang XH, Wang L, et al. Construction of evaluation index system of virtual simulation experiment course on major of nursing[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2024, 21(9):1052-1059.
[18]	Liu K, Zhang WW, Li W, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04662-x
[19]	李欣璐, 汤靓, 梁娜, 等. 大专护生外科护理学实训虚拟现实系统应用效果评价[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(16):92-95.
	Li XL, Tang L, Liang N, et al. Application effect of a virtual reality system in surgical nursing practical training for associate degree nursing students[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2023, 38(16):92-95.