护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系的构建

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.01.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的构建护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系,为评价护理专业案例库网络教学平台的可用性及效果提供科学的工具。方法以可用性评价理论和基于网络的学习环境有用性评价框架为理论基础,通过文献分析法初步构建护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系,通过2轮专家咨询和层次分析法,最终确定指标体系及权重。结果护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系包括3个一级指标(平台可用性、教学效用、附加效用),11个二级指标,39个三级指标。2轮问卷回收率均为100%;专家权威系数为0.85;2轮各级指标的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.121~0.326、0.210~0.326(均P<0.05)。结论护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系设计合理,权重层次分明,各指标科学、可靠,可作为护理专业案例库网络教学平台的评价工具。

关键词: 德尔菲技术, 护理, 案例库, 网络教学平台, 评价体系

Abstract:

Objective To establish the evaluation index system of the network teaching platform based on nursing cases database. Methods Two theories of usability evaluation and web-based learning environment usefulness evaluation framework were used as the theoretical framework. The evaluation index system of nursing cases database network teaching platform was initially formed by literature analysis. Through two rounds of expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process,the index system and weight were finally determined. Results The index system included 3 categories(platform usability,teaching utility and additional utility),11 subcategories and 39 items. The recovery rate of the two rounds of questionnaires was 100% and the authoritative coefficient was 0.85. The first round Kendall's W coordination coefficient was between 0.121 and 0.326,and the second round was between 0.210 and 0.326(P<0.05). Conclusion The index system is reasonable in design and the index weight are acceptable. The index system can be used as an evaluation tool for network teaching platform based on nursing cases database.

Key words: School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China

刘莺, 肖惠敏, 张旋, 林雁, 许贵如. 护理专业案例库网络教学平台评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(1): 30-34.

LIU Ying, XIAO Hui-min, ZHANG Xuan, LIN Yan, XU Gui-ru. The evaluation index system of network teaching platform based on nursing cases database[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(1): 30-34.

图/表 2

参考文献 13

[1]	教育部. 关于印发《教育信息化2.0行动计划》的通知[EB/OL].( 2018- 04- 25). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html .
[2]	韩锡斌, 葛文双, 周潜 , 等. MOOC平台与典型网络教学平台的比较研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2014(1):61-68.
	Han XB, Ge WS, Zhou Q , et al. Comparative study on MOOC platform and typical network teaching platform[J]. China Educ Technol, 2014(1):61-68.
[3]	Qamar K, Rehman S, Khan MA . Effectiveness of case-based learning during small groups sessions at army medical college[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2016,26(3):232-233.
[4]	Nielsen J. 可用性工程[M]. 刘正捷, 译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2004.
	Nielsen J. Usability Engineering[M]. Lin ZJ, Trans. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2004.
[5]	Kirsi S, Anne-Maritta T,. The usefulness of web-based learning environment. The evaluation tool into the Portal of Fin-nish Virtual University[EB/OL]. ( 2003- 05- 08). http://www.hsh.no/menu/ .
[6]	Reid N . The Delphi technique:its contribution to the evaluation of professional practice[J]. Professional Compe-tence and Quality Assurance in the Caring Professions, 1988: 230-262.
[7]	International Organisation for Standar-disation. Ergonomic requirements for of-fice work with visual display terminals(VDTs) —Part 11:Guidance on usability(ISO 9241-11:1998)[EB/OL]. ( 1998-03)[2020-06-23]. https://www.iso.org/standard/16883.html .
[8]	郭秀花 . 医学现场调查技术与统计分析[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 78-81.
	Guo XH. Medical field investigation technology and statistical analysis[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2009: 78-81.
[9]	新华社. 中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》[EB/OL]. ( 2019-02-23). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/23/content_5367987.htm.
[10]	吴琦 . 教育大数据视域下AEMP平台应用及教学评价创新[J]. 职教通讯, 2019,34(24):47-49.
	Wu Q . Research on AEMP design and teaching evaluation reform from the perspective of educational big data[J]. Commun Vocat Educ, 2019,34(24):47-49.
[11]	张浩, 杨凌霞, 韦学恩 . 网络教学平台的可用性评价研究综述[J]. 现代教育技术, 2010,20(12):91-96.
	Zhang H, Yang LX, Wei XE . Review of usability evaluation study of web-based instruction platform[J]. Mod Educ Technol, 2010,20(12):91-96.
[12]	贾朋如 . MOOC可用性的实证研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2016.
	Jia PR . An empirical study on the usability of MOOC[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2016.
[13]	李葆萍, 周颖 . 基于大数据的教学评价研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2016,26(6):5-12.
	Li BP, Zhou Y . Research on educational evaluation based on big data[J]. Mod Educ Technol, 2016,26(6):5-12.

[1]	杨智慧, 李兴雯, 闭晓君, 林劲秋, 赵倩倩, 刘素婷, 罗园园, 张立力. 健康评估课程知识图谱的构建及初步应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1035-1040.
[2]	薛晓燕, 李红梅, 李琳杰, 郝丽敏. 专业英语词汇数字化游戏的设计及在护理本科生中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1041-1045.
[3]	刘婷, 杨富国, 杨丽, 杨秀玲, 韩晶, 王爱敏. 护理硕士研究生使用人工智能生成内容工具体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1046-1051.
[4]	庞冰, 王秀红, 王丽, 李红. 护理专业虚拟仿真实验课程评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1052-1058.
[5]	秦玉婷, 杨彬彬, 耿雪梅, 王诗源, 赵庆洋. 国内护理虚拟仿真领域热点及发展趋势分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1066-1071.
[6]	李金亮, 范秀珍. 人工智能在职业生涯规划中的应用及对护理教育的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1072-1075.
[7]	王雅琦, 高洁, 王克芳. 生成式人工智能在护理模拟教学中的潜在应用价值、挑战和展望[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1076-1081.
[8]	绳宇, 贾玉玲, 张黎明, 陈伟, 李安, 左凤林. 护理实践技能操作水平评价项目实施及对学生能力培养的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1082-1087.
[9]	林丹, 张艺雄, 孙蓉, 柏亚妹, 张薛晴, 宋玉磊. 赛教融合视角下临床护理技能综合实训教学方案的设计与实践效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1088-1092.
[10]	庄嘉元, 申玲, 王珠珠, 胡荣, 张妍燕, 王艳, 陈晓华, 刘晓如. 社区护理学课程思政教学设计与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1093-1098.
[11]	张冰妍, 李进, 姚颖, 何静茹, 杨惠敏. 社区缺血性脑卒中患者二级预防服药依从性认知干预方案的构建及应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1099-1105.
[12]	郑迎, 余冉晖, 裘妃, 陆彤瑶, 孙旦华, 吴小花, 徐红贞. 角色扮演卡牌游戏方案的构建及在扁桃体切除患儿围术期的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1106-1112.
[13]	陈湘军, 胡芳, 汤黎, 谭小梅. 临床护士反思性实践水平及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1120-1125.
[14]	陈媛, 吴林静, 喻海燕, 王历刚. 心血管专科护士再评价管理体系的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1126-1131.
[15]	柴剑丽, 吴春燕, 袁爱琴, 骆浦英, 冯剑, 陆明晰. 血液透析患者疑难自体动静脉内瘘扣眼穿刺管理方案的设计与临床实证研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1132-1140.