学业特权问卷的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.12.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的引入学业特权问卷并检验其信效度。方法对原版学业特权问卷进行翻译、回译、跨文化调试,形成中文版学业特权问卷,然后用该问卷对便利选取的贵州省1 102名大学生进行调查,4周后从初测样本中随机抽取121名大学生进行重测。结果中文版学业特权问卷为单维度8个条目,Cronbach’s α系数为0.76,重测信度为0.70（P<0.01）。验证性因素分析支持中文版学业特权问卷的单因子结构（CFI=0.93,TLI=0.90,IFI=0.93,GFI=0.97,NFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.04）,条目的因子载荷为0.43~0.69。结论中文版学业特权问卷具有较好的信效度,可用于测量我国大学生学业特权。

关键词: 翻译, 学业特权, 大学生, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire（AEQ） into Chinese and to examine its reliability and validity in Chinese university students. Methods The English version of the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire was translated,back translated and modified for cultural adaptation. The Chinese version of Academic Entitlement Questionnaire was used to investigate 1102 college students in Guizhou province. Another 121 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of AEQ four weeks after the first investigation. Results The internal consistency reliability and retest reliability of the scale were 0.76 and 0.70,respectively（P<0.01）. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that CFI,TLI,IFI,GFI,NFI,RMSEA and SRMR were 0.93,0.90,0.93,0.97,0.91,0.07 and 0.04 respectively. The factor loading of each item ranged from 0.43 to 0.69. Conclusion The Chinese version of the AEQ has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure the academic entitlement of Chinese college students.

Key words: Translating, Academic entitlement, College students, Reliability, Validity

胡宁宁,林素兰,赵帝,何壮,徐鹏. 学业特权问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(12): 1110-1113.

HU Ning-ning,LIN Su-lan,ZHAO Di,HE Zhuang,XU Peng. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Academic Entitlement Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(12): 1110-1113.

图/表 1

参考文献 17

[1]	Dubovsky SL. Coping with entitlement in medical education[J]. N Engl J Med, 1986, 315(26):1672-1674. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612253152609
[2]	Achacoso MV. “What do you mean my grade is not an A?”:an investigation of academic entitlement,causal attributions,and self-regulation in college students[D]. Austin:The University of Texas at Austin, 2006.
[3]	Greenberger E, Lessard J, Chen CS, et al. Self-entitled college students:contributions of personality,parenting,and motivational factors[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2008, 37(10):1193-1204. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9284-9
[4]	Chowning K, Campbell NJ. Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement:individual differences in students’ externalized responsibility and entitled expectations[J]. J Educ Psychol, 2009, 101(4):982-997. doi: 10.1037/a0016351
[5]	Kopp JP, Zinn TE, Finney SJ, et al. The development and evaluation of the academic entitlement questionnaire[J]. Meas Eval Couns Dev, 2011, 44(2):105-129.
[6]	Lippmann S, Bulanda RE, Wagenaar TC. Student entitlement:issues and strategies for confronting entitlement in the classroom and beyond[J]. Coll Teach, 2009, 57(4):197-204.
[7]	Mellor JK. Academic entitlement and incivility:differencese class in faculty and students’ perceptions[D]. Tucson:The University of Arizona, 2011.
[8]	Chapin TM. Associations between academic entitlement,learning approaches and awareness of future consequences in baccalaureate nursing students[D]. Minneapolis:Capella University, 2018.
[9]	Vallade JI, Martin MM, Weber K. Academic entitlement,grade orientation,and classroom justice as predictors of instructional beliefs and learning outcomes[J]. Commun Q, 2014, 62(5):497-517. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2014.949386
[10]	Boswell SS. “I deserve success”:academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy,social networking,and demographic variables[J]. Soc Psychol Educ, 2012, 15(3):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9184-4
[11]	Luckett M, Trocchia PJ, Noel NM, et al. A typology of students based on academic entitlement[J]. J Educ Bus, 2017, 92(2):96-102. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2017.1281214
[12]	Kurtyilmaz Y. Adaptation of academic entitlement questionnaire[J]. Anadolu J Educ Sci Int, 2019, 9(2):314-351.
[13]	Sessoms J, Finney SJ, Kopp JP. Does the measurement or magnitude of academic entitlement change over time?[J]. Meas Eval Couns Dev, 2016, 49(3):243-257.
[14]	俞国良, 李森. 学业特权的概念及其对心理健康的影响[J]. 中国人民大学教育学刊, 2020(1):133-145.
	Yu GL, Li S. The concept of academic entitlement and its influence on mental health[J]. Renmin Univ China Educ J, 2020(1):133-145.
[15]	Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[M]. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980:389-444.
[16]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018:158-160.
	Wu ML. Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis:operation and application of SPSS[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2018:158-160.
[17]	吴明隆. 结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009:37-61.
	Wu ML. Structural equation model:operation and application of AMOS[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009:37-61.