中华护理教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8): 755-758.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.017
收稿日期:
2020-09-23
出版日期:
2021-08-20
发布日期:
2021-08-24
通讯作者:
黄丽华
作者简介:
杨苏:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail: 基金资助:
Received:
2020-09-23
Online:
2021-08-20
Published:
2021-08-24
Contact:
Li-hua HUANG
摘要:
该文对跨专业共享决策模式的定义、影响医疗环境的3个层次水平(宏观、中观、微观)及跨专业共享决策模式在护理决策实践中的应用进行综述。同时,也提出国内学者进行跨专业共享决策实践时可考虑从丰富护理核心课程的内容和形式、构建以专科护士为主导的跨专业团队等方面入手,以推动跨专业共享决策模式在医疗实践中的运用。
杨苏,黄丽华. 跨专业共享决策模式的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 755-758.
YANG Su,HUANG Li-hua. Research progress on interprofessional shared decision-making model[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(8): 755-758.
[1] |
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter:revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1999, 49(5):651-661.
pmid: 10452420 |
[2] | Légaré F, O’Connor AC, Graham I, et al. Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions:use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework[J]. Can Fam Physician Med De Fam Can, 2006, 52:476-477. |
[3] |
Stacey D, Brière N, Robitaille H, et al. A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making[J]. J Interprof Care, 2014, 28(5):453-459.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.911157 pmid: 24766619 |
[4] | Amalakuhan B, Adams SG. Improving outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:the role of the interprofessional app-roach[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10:1225-1232. |
[5] |
Lenzen SA, Daniëls R, van Bokhoven MA, et al. What makes it so difficult for nurses to coach patients in shared decision making? A process evaluation[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 80:1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.005 |
[6] |
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients:a systematic review and thematic synjournal of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(3):291-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 pmid: 24305642 |
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients:a systematic review and thematic synjournal of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(3):291-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 pmid: 24305642 |
|
[7] |
Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making:a mixed methods study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(4):554-564.
doi: 10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-4 |
Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making:a mixed methods study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(4):554-564.
doi: 10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-4 |
|
[8] | Härter MD, Moumjid N, Cornuz J, et al. Shared decision making in 2017:International accomplishments in policy,research and implementation[J]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz,Fortbildung und Qua-lität im Gesundheitswesen, 2017,123- 124:1-5. |
Härter MD, Moumjid N, Cornuz J, et al. Shared decision making in 2017:International accomplishments in policy,research and implementation[J]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz,Fortbildung und Qua-lität im Gesundheitswesen, 2017,123- 124:1-5. | |
[9] |
Zou XN. Epidemic trend,screening,and early detection and treatment of cancer in Chinese population[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2017, 14(1):50-59.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0047 |
Zou XN. Epidemic trend,screening,and early detection and treatment of cancer in Chinese population[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2017, 14(1):50-59.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0047 |
|
[10] |
Tucker JD, Wong B, Nie JB, et al. Rebuilding patient-physician trust in China[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10046):755.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31362-9 |
Tucker JD, Wong B, Nie JB, et al. Rebuilding patient-physician trust in China[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10046):755.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31362-9 |
|
[11] | Lühnen J, Mühlhauser I, Richter T. Informed decision-making with and for people with dementia:developing and pilot testing an education program for legal representatives(PRODECIDE)[J]. Dementia(London), 2019, 18(6):2303-2321. |
Lühnen J, Mühlhauser I, Richter T. Informed decision-making with and for people with dementia:developing and pilot testing an education program for legal representatives(PRODECIDE)[J]. Dementia(London), 2019, 18(6):2303-2321. | |
[12] |
Yu CH, Ivers NM, Stacey D, et al. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2015, 16:286.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8 |
Yu CH, Ivers NM, Stacey D, et al. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2015, 16:286.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8 |
|
[13] |
Davies N, Schiowitz B, Rait G, et al. Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care:a systematic review[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2019, 31(10):1403-1419.
doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826 |
Davies N, Schiowitz B, Rait G, et al. Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care:a systematic review[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2019, 31(10):1403-1419.
doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826 |
|
[14] |
Keshmiri F, Rezai M, Tavakoli N. The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making:perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2020, 26(4):1153-1161.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13379 pmid: 32114699 |
Keshmiri F, Rezai M, Tavakoli N. The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making:perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2020, 26(4):1153-1161.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13379 pmid: 32114699 |
|
[15] |
Edwards ST, Hooker ER, Brienza R, et al. Association of a multisite interprofessional education initiative with quality of primary care[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2019, 2(11):e1915943.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15943 |
Edwards ST, Hooker ER, Brienza R, et al. Association of a multisite interprofessional education initiative with quality of primary care[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2019, 2(11):e1915943.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15943 |
|
[16] | Michalsen A, Long AC, Dekeyser Ganz F, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU[J]. Critical Care Me-dicine, 2019, 47(9):1258-1266. |
Michalsen A, Long AC, Dekeyser Ganz F, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU[J]. Critical Care Me-dicine, 2019, 47(9):1258-1266. | |
[17] |
Lee YK, Ng CJ. The state of shared decision making in Ma-laysia[J]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 123/124:66-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019 |
Lee YK, Ng CJ. The state of shared decision making in Ma-laysia[J]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 123/124:66-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019 |
|
[18] |
Van den Bulcke B, Vyt A, Vanheule S, et al. The perceived quality of interprofessional teamwork in an intensive care unit:a single centre intervention study[J]. J Interprof Care, 2016, 30(3):301-308.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1146876 pmid: 27152533 |
Van den Bulcke B, Vyt A, Vanheule S, et al. The perceived quality of interprofessional teamwork in an intensive care unit:a single centre intervention study[J]. J Interprof Care, 2016, 30(3):301-308.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1146876 pmid: 27152533 |
|
[19] |
Berger-Höger B, Liethmann K, Mühlhauser I, et al. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers:a cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 93:141-152.
doi: S0020-7489(19)30027-6 pmid: 30925280 |
Berger-Höger B, Liethmann K, Mühlhauser I, et al. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers:a cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 93:141-152.
doi: S0020-7489(19)30027-6 pmid: 30925280 |
|
[20] |
Buhse S, Kuniss N, Liethmann K, et al. Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care:cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(12):e024004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004 |
Buhse S, Kuniss N, Liethmann K, et al. Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care:cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(12):e024004.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004 |
[1] | 程侣, 程悦, 李艳. 三步商议模型在医患共享决策中的研究进展及护理启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 1006-1011. |
[2] | 刘东玲, 秦月兰, 李珍, 周娟, 袁平. 2型糖尿病患者饮食决策辅助工具编制及应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 686-694. |
[3] | 钟汶汐, 毛弦筠, 程静, 马李, 陈燕华, 胡伟力. 应用生成式人工智能培养护理人才跨专业沟通技能的态势分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(3): 282-288. |
[4] | 王美, 杨梅, 张秀婷, 房文杰, 范秀珍. 护理本科实习生自我效能和职业认同在转型冲击与职业决策困难间的链式中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 197-203. |
[5] | 胡美华, 谢爱清, 李金花, 周京凤, 邱翠玲, 李旭英. 开放式动态评价模式在推进优质护理服务中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 969-973. |
[6] | 傅文瑶,庄一渝. 护理硕士研究生跨专业教育的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(6): 757-762. |
[7] | 李青锋, 吴萍, 谢丽思, 刘婷, 谭聂琼, 龙利娟. ICU护士跨专业协作能力现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(5): 534-539. |
[8] | 郑旭彤, 张曼, 秦朱珠, 叶欣欣, 陈小凤, 王周华, 詹陈菊. 慢性肾病患者肾脏替代治疗辅助决策工具开发与验证研究的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 500-507. |
[9] | 羊洋,袁艺标,曹恒畅,许勤. 基于跨专业教育理念的创伤虚拟仿真实验项目的开发与应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(7): 597-603. |
[10] | 范波,钟清玲,鄢鸿雁,江思忆,余忆,徐瑶,徐佳雪,毛琳,崔丽美. 跨专业教育在护理硕士专业学位研究生培养中的态势分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(7): 604-608. |
[11] | 雷延源,崔香淑. 护理专业学生跨专业合作学习的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(7): 609-614. |
[12] | 滕玉芳,杨华,曹燕平. 护理实习生临床归属感在领悟社会支持与职业决策自我效能间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(11): 1007-1010. |
[13] | 吴艳梅,吴迪,高祖梅,任艳蕊,蔡晓美. 护理硕士专业学位研究生临床培养方案的整合与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 686-689. |
[14] | 陈恬,胡韵,俞珮璐,施逸雯. 护理教师视角下基于合作博弈论的跨专业教育促进因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 710-715. |
[15] | 侯锦,郭爱敏. 英国诺丁汉大学跨专业教育与学习中心见闻与启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 765-768. |
|