eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus

Chinese Journal of Nursing Education ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10): 1173-1179.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2026.10.004

• Teacher Professional Development • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the compatibility of the evaluation system for teaching and educational competencies of undergraduate clinical nursing faculty within the context of “New Medical Education”

XIE Chenxi1(), TAN Lingling1,*(), TANG Yinliang1, XU Yuedan1, GONG Jie2, LÜ Juyuan1, JIAO Li’e1   

  1. 1 Department of Nursing, the Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
    2 Department of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China
  • Received:2026-03-08 Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-10-15
  • Contact: *TAN Lingling,E-mail:562639110@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Hunan Provincial Teaching Reform Research Project for Regular Undergraduate Universities(202401000826)

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the adaptability of the teaching ability evaluation system for undergraduate clinical nursing teachers in the context of New Medical Education and to propose optimization strategies. Methods A systematic search was conducted in CNKI,Wanfang Data,VIP,Web of Science,PubMed,and CINAHL from database inception to December 31,2025. Evaluation indicators were extracted and standardized from the included literature. Cluster analysis and co-occurrence analysis were employed to reveal the dimensional structure and temporal evolution characteristics of the evaluation systems,and adaptability analysis was conducted based on the core requirements of New Medical Education. Results A total of 52 papers were included(31 before and 21 after the proposal of the New Medical Education). A total of 904 evaluation indicators were extracted and consolidated into 55 standardized terms through synonym merging,which were categorized into five core dimensions:teaching implementation ability,clinical practice ability,research and innovation ability,communication and management ability,and professional literacy. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed 47 nodes in the pre-proposal period and 41 nodes in the post-proposal period,indicating that research topics tended to be more focused. Adaptability analysis showed that among the 440 pairings of 55 terms with 8 core requirements of New Medical Education,only 99 pairs(22.5%) demonstrated meaningful associations. The coverage rate for competency-based orientation was 100%,while those for interdisciplinary integration(6.1%),information technology and intelligent medical education(5.6%),and life-cycle health services(1.6%) remained notably low. Conclusion The current evaluation system exhibits structural mismatches with the core requirements of New Medical Education,particularly in interdisciplinary integration and life-cycle health services. Future optimization should focus on three aspects:dimensional structure,evaluation orientation,and dynamic update mechanisms.

Key words: New Medical Sciences, Clinical Nursing Faculty, Teaching and Educational Competencies, Evaluation System, Fit Analysis