中文版高血压患者自我管理评估工具的系统评价

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.01.013

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of self-management assessment tools for hypertensive patients in China, and to provide evidence-based support for healthcare professionals to select appropriate assessment tools. Methods CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ProQuest were searched to collect studies related to the measurement characteristics evaluation of Chinese version of self-management assessment tools for hypertensive patients. The search time limitation was from the establishment of the database to May 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers, who rated the methodological quality and measurement properties of the assessment tools according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) and formed the final recommendations. Results A total of seven studies involving seven Chinese versions of self-management assessment tools for hypertension patients were included, and only content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and stability were reported. Since the content validity of each assessment tool was uncertain or inadequate, there was no Category A recommended tools, and there were five Category B recommended tools and two Category C recommended tools. There was high-quality evidence to prove that the internal consistency and construct validity of the Hypertension Patients Self-management Behavior Rating Scale were “sufficient”. Conclusion The Chinese version of hypertension self-management assessment tools is diverse, but the overall quality is not high. The construct validity and internal consistency of the Hypertension Patients Self-management Behavior Rating Scale are good, which can be temporarily recommended for use. However, there are still shortcomings in other measurement properties and further research are required in the future.

Key words: Hypertension, Self-management, Assessment instrument, Measurement characteristics, Systematic review

YAN Zhongting, LIANG Yi, WANG Fang, SANG Yuhuan, YUAN Yuan, JU Mei. Chinese version of hypertension self-management assessment tools based on COSMIN guidelines：a systematic review[J].Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(1): 73-80.

Figures/Tables 4

References 22

[1]	GBD Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990—2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2
[2]	马丽媛, 王增武, 樊静, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》关于中国高血压流行和防治现状[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(30):3715-3720. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0502
	Ma LY, Wang ZW, Fan J, et al. Epidemiology and management of hypertension in China:an analysis using data from the annual report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China(2021)[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2022, 25(30):3715-3720. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0502
[3]	中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟(中国), 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24(1):24-56.
	Writing Group of 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, Chinese Hypertension League, et al. 2018 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension[J]. Chin J Cardiovasc Med, 2019, 24(1):24-56.
[4]	宋媛媛, 毛永香, 王文秀, 等. 板房社区高血压病人自我管理干预效果研究[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 31(13):1658-1661.
	Song YY, Mao YX, Wang WX, et al. Effect of self-management intervention among hypertension patients in earthquake-stricken communities[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2017, 31(13):1658-1661.
[5]	冯晗博, 张鑫, 李小寒. 辽宁省社区老年高血压患者自我管理能力和生活质量的相关性[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(4):331-335.
	Feng HB, Zhang X, Li XH. Correlation between self-management ability and quality of life of older hypertension patients living in community in Liaoning Province[J]. J China Med Univ, 2020, 49(4):331-335.
[6]	吴傅蕾, 刘欢, 袁长蓉. 患者报告结局在肿瘤照护领域的应用现状及思考[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2017, 34(3):47-50.
	Wu FL, Liu H, Yuan CR. Application status and thinking of patient report outcome in the field of cancer care[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2017, 34(3):47-50.
[7]	刘宁, 张婧珺, 鱼星锋, 等. 高血压病人自我管理量表的研制与信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2015, 29(14):1764-1767.
	Liu N, Zhang JJ, Yu XF, et al. Development and testing of reliability and validity of Self Management Scale for patients with hypertension[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2015, 29(14):1764-1767.
[8]	宫悦华, 王慕然, 朱燕琴, 等. 中青年高血压病人自我管理行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(9):1649-1652.
	Gong YH, Wang MR, Zhu YQ, et al. Development of Self-management Behavior Scale in young and middle-aged patients with hypertension and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2021, 35(9):1649-1652.
[9]	Wu LR, Liu MH, Huang CM, et al. The development of a Self-Management Evaluation Scale for elderly adults with hyperten-sion based on the capability,opportunity,and motivation-beha-viour(COM-B) model[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2023, 23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03642-y
[10]	Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 pmid: 29435801
[11]	Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments[J]. Qual Life Res, 2009, 18(8):1115-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5 pmid: 19711195
[12]	陈祎婷, 沈蓝君, 彭健, 等. 改良版定量系统评价证据分级方法对患者报告结局测量工具的评价[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(10):57-60.
	Chen YT, Shen LJ, Peng J, et al. Modified GRADE evaluation of COSMIN method for patient reported outcome measures[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2020, 37(10):57-60.
[13]	Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties:a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist[J]. Qual Life Res, 2012, 21(4):651-657. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
[14]	赵秋利, 刘晓. 高血压病人自我管理行为测评量表的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12(11):26-31.
	Zhao QL, Liu X. Reliability and validity of the Hypertension Patients Self-management Behavior Rating Scale(HPSMBRS)[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2012, 12(11):26-31.
[15]	Ma Y, Cheng HY, Sit JWH, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Hypertension Self-care Profile[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2021, 36(5):420-429. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000708
[16]	陈烨, 曹松梅, 严金川. 高血压自我护理量表的汉化及信效度测评[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2014, 30(29):12-16.
	Chen Y, Cao SM, Yan JC. Reliability and validity of the Chinese-version Hypertension Self-care Profile[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2014, 30(29):12-16.
[17]	Ngoh SHA, Lim HWL, Koh YLE, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Mandarin versions of the Hypertension Self-Care Profile instrument[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(45):e8568.
[18]	Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy,terminology,and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(7):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
[19]	陈潇, 张玉侠. 认知性访谈在患者护理服务体验量表编制中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(1):83-89. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.01.013
	Chen X, Zhang YX. The application of cognitive interviews in the development of Patient Experience with Nursing Care Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(1):83-89. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.01.013
[20]	陈欢, 侯朝铭, 高静, 等. 中文版高血压患者服药依从性量表测量学特性的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(2):171-178. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.02.006
	Chen H, Hou CM, Gao J, et al. Chinese version of the Medication Adherence Scale for patients with hypertension:a systematic review of psychometric properties[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(2):171-178. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.02.006
[21]	彭健, 沈蓝君, 陈祎婷, 等. COSMIN-RoB清单简介及测量工具内部结构研究的偏倚风险清单解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(10):1234-1240.
	Peng J, Shen LJ, Chen YT, et al. An overview of the COSMIN-RoB checklist and the interpretation of it in evaluating the risk of bias of studies on internal structure[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2020, 20(10):1234-1240.
[22]	彭健, 沈蓝君, 陈祎婷, 等. 对COSMIN-RoB清单中测量工具稳定性、测量误差和效标效度研究偏倚风险的清单解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(11):1340-1344.
	Peng J, Shen LJ, Chen YT, et al. Interpretation of COSMIN risk of bias checklist in evaluating risk of bias of studies on reliability,measurement error and criteria validity of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2020, 20(11):1340-1344.

Chinese version of hypertension self-management assessment tools based on COSMIN guidelines：a systematic review

HTML

PDF(PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 22

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	LI Xiaohua, ZHU Hong, YANG Dan, HAO Yufang, LI Xuejing. The influence of role modeling on nursing students’ professional identity：a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(7): 841-848.
[2]	LIU Suxiang, ZHANG Huafang, SHI Yajun, LIU Qingqing, ZHANG Ying, YANG Lili. A systematic review of hypoglycemic fear assessment tools in adult diabetic patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(7): 873-880.
[3]	ZHENG Guanglei, ZHAO Yaning, ZHANG Wei, GU Xiaoying. Application and effect evaluation of exercise nursing program for patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(5): 587-592.
[4]	GUO Qin, ZHANG Xiangeng, WANG Hongyan, LIU Linfeng, LIU Shan, LIU Yunqi, ZHANG Yunqiu. Analysis of the current situation and factors influencing the benefit finding of patients with hypertension in pension institutions [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(9): 1095-1099.
[5]	CHEN Tingting, HOU Chaoming, GAO Jing, CHEN Huan, LUO Huan, CHEN Xinyu. Chinese version of the self-management scale for patients with hemodialysis：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(7): 857-863.
[6]	DENG Chunyan,DU Xingmei,RAN Lingyun,YANG Zhongting,WEN Xuan,DENG Rui,HUANG Yuan. Lay-delivered group psychotherapy to relieve perinatal depressive symptoms in Chinese：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(6): 707-715.
[7]	JIN Yanwei, SUN Hongyu, JI Yan. Public risk perception and response behavior of the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(5): 614-619.
[8]	WU Tao, FANG Yuanyuan, QIAN Ruilian. Research progress on self-management of adult patients with epilepsy [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(4): 508-512.
[9]	WANG Shuiling, YANG Lianzhao, CHEN Ling, YANG Yong. The frailty trajectory and influencing factors in community elderly patients with moderate to severe hypertension [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(3): 343-348.
[10]	LUO Huan, HOU Chaoming, GAO Jing, CHEN Huan, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tingting, CHEN Xinyu. Chinese version of the self-management assessment tools for patients with type 2 diabetes：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(3): 349-355.
[11]	LUO Yuan, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Mengxi, DENG Yuqian, RAN Haiye, LIU Jiaxin, ZHAO Liping. Machine learning for fall prediction and monitor of older adults：a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(12): 1513-1519.
[12]	ZHANG Ying, LIU Xueqin, LIU Xiaohui, WEI Wei, WU Yaqi, JIANG Xiao, ZHANG Xiaofei, NIE Yajie. Systematic review of fatigue prevalence and its influencing factors in patients with maintenance hemodialysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(11): 1391-1397.
[13]	WANG Jinyun, YANG Lili, YU Jie, WU Chen, YANG Heng. A systematic review of the evaluation tools for core competencies of head nurses based on COSMIN guidelines [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(11): 1347-1354.
[14]	HE Jiali, GAO Jing, WU Chenxi, BAI Dingxi, LUO Huan, GONG Xiaoyan, WANG Wei. A systematic review of the palliative care needs assessment tool for cancer patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(11): 1305-1312.
[15]	XIA Yuting,HE Caiyun,WU Xuemei,CAO Fei,LIU Na,MA Lin. Application of a structured health education program in self-management of young and middle-aged patients with ischemic stroke [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(1): 82-86.