ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
专题策划——护理教育数智化发展

急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维人工智能训练系统的开发及在新入职护士中的应用研究

  • 方蘅英 ,
  • 曲峰蕾 ,
  • 程龙 ,
  • 胡望静 ,
  • 贾佳欣 ,
  • 李慧娟
展开
  • 510630 广州市 中山大学附属第三医院
方蘅英,女,博士,主任护师,E-mail:fanghy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
李慧娟,博士,主任护师,E-mail:lihuij5@mail.sysu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-05-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-19

基金资助

广东省岭南南丁格尔护理研究院;广东省护理学会护理创新研究发展课题(YJYZ202302);广东省护理学会护理创新研究发展课题(YJYZ202308)

Development of an artificial intelligence training system for clinical nursing decision-making thinking in acute left heart failure and its application effect among newly recruited nurses

  • FANG Hengying ,
  • QU Fenglei ,
  • CHENG Long ,
  • HU Wangjing ,
  • JIA Jiaxin ,
  • LI Huijuan
Expand

Received date: 2025-05-26

  Online published: 2025-09-19

摘要

目的 探讨急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维人工智能训练系统在新入职护士中的初步应用效果。方法 以急性左心衰竭的发生机制为依据,设计不同病因的急性左心衰竭案例,撰写基于标准化病人的案例对话脚本,利用人工智能自然语言处理技术,形成急性左心衰竭护理虚拟模拟情景;开发包含个人信息、案例训练、考核评价、系统管理4个模块的急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维人工智能训练系统。2025年5月,将该系统的案例1应用于该院在职的新入职护士中。结果 173名新入职护士共产生411份训练数据。173名新入职护士在急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维上的得分为(70.99±8.63)分;对于411份训练数据,总体决策正确率的均值为73.53%,训练总响应时间中位数为794.96[四分位数间距(IQR)=777.11] s,决策点响应时间中位数为29.44(IQR=28.78)s。结论 急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维人工智能训练系统具有可用性,有助于激发新入职护士的学习热情,发现新入职护士在急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维上的薄弱之处。

本文引用格式

方蘅英 , 曲峰蕾 , 程龙 , 胡望静 , 贾佳欣 , 李慧娟 . 急性左心衰竭临床护理决策思维人工智能训练系统的开发及在新入职护士中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025 , 22(9) : 1049 -1056 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.09.004

Abstract

Objective To explore the preliminary application effect of the artificial intelligence training system for clinical nursing decision-making thinking in acute left heart failure for the training of newly recruited nurses. Methods Based on the pathogenesis of acute left heart failure,cases of acute left heart failure with different etiologies were designed,and case dialogue scripts based on standardized patients were drafted. By using artificial intelligence natural language processing technology,virtual simulation scenarios for acute left heart failure nursing were created. An artificial intelligence training system for nursing decision-making thinking was finally developed,which includes four modules:personal information,case training,assessment and evaluation,and system management. In May 2025,the system was applied to 173 newly recruited nurses in the hospital. Results A total of 411 training data were generated from 173 newly recruited nurses. The score of newly recruited nurses in clinical nursing decision-making thinking for acute left heart failure was(70.99±8.63) points,with an overall decision-making accuracy rate of 73.53%. The total response time for each training session was 794.96 s[interquartile range(IQR)=777.11],and the response time for decision point was 29.44 s(IQR=28.78). Conclusion The artificial intelligence training system for clinical nursing decision-making thinking in acute left heart failure is usable. It is helpful in stimulating the learning enthusiasm of newly recruited nurses,and identifying their weaknesses in clinical nursing decision-making thinking for acute left heart failure.

参考文献

[1] Homann G, Toschke C, Gassmann P, et al. Accuracy of the AAST organ injury scale for CT evaluation of traumatic liver and spleen injuries[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2014, 17(1):25-30.
[2] Chen QR, Liu D, Zhou CY, et al. Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses:a cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2020, 29(7/8):1332-1340.
[3] Sim JJM, Rusli KDB, Seah B, et al. Virtual simulation to enhance clinical reasoning in nursing:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2022,69:26-39.
[4] Theobald KA, Tutticci N, Ramsbotham J, et al. Effectiveness of using simulation in the development of clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students:a systematic review[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2021,57:103220.
[5] Simmons B. Clinical reasoning:concept analysis[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2010, 66(5):1151-1158.
[6] Nibbelink CW, Brewer BB. Decision-making in nursing practice:an integrative literature review[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2018, 27(5/6):917-928.
[7] Cobbett S, Snelgrove-Clarke E. Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge,anxiety,and self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2016,45:179-184.
[8] Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, et al. Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education:randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2019, 21(3):e11529.
[9] Bogossian FE, Cooper SJ, Cant R, et al. A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration(FIRST2ACT WEB) on student learning[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2015, 35(10):e36-e42.
[10] Kiegaldie D, Shaw L. Virtual reality simulation for nursing education:effectiveness and feasibility[J]. BMC Nurs, 2023, 22(1):488.
[11] Lee E, Baek G. Development and effects of a virtual reality simulation nursing education program combined with clinical practice based on an information processing model[J]. Comput Inform Nurs, 2023, 41(12):1016-1025.
[12] 罗园园, 张捷, 樊琼玲, 等. 闯关式“案例+探究”教学法在护理研究课程中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(11):1026-1031.
  Luo YY, Zhang J, Fan QL, et al. “Case + exploration” with breakthrough style applied in Nursing Research[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(11):1026-1031.
[13] 刘佳惠, 李金花, 李旭英, 等. 肿瘤专科医院新入职护士培训目标清单的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2):152-158.
  Liu JH, Li JH, Li XY, et al. Construction of training objectives list for new nurses in oncology specialized hospitals[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2024, 21(2):152-158.
[14] 胡倩, 张志焕, 张力川, 等. 模拟前准备在医学情境模拟教学中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025, 22(7):890-896.
  Hu Q, Zhang ZH, Zhang LC, et al. Application of pre-simulation preparation in medical simulation teaching:a scoping review[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2025, 22(7):890-896.
文章导航

/