ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
院校教育

护理专业考试命题与试卷分析中的问题及要点解析

  • 张永爱 ,
  • 曹弘毅 ,
  • 褚静 ,
  • 张海苗 ,
  • 牛育鸿
展开
  • 710021 西安市 西安医学院
张永爱:女,博士,教授,E-mail: 875019131@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-08-04

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-24

基金资助

2019年度陕西高等教育教学改革研究重点项目(19JZ006)

Problems and main points in setting questions of an examination and analyzing the examination paper in nursing

  • Yong-ai ZHANG ,
  • Hong-yi CAO ,
  • Jing CHU ,
  • Hai-miao ZHANG ,
  • Yu-hong NIU
Expand

Received date: 2020-08-04

  Online published: 2021-08-24

摘要

考试评价是教育评价的重要组成部分,是加强教学管理过程、完善课程体系、促进学生学习、提高教育教学质量的重要环节。文章基于教育统计与测量学的理论基础,梳理了护理专业考试命题、试卷分析中单项指标分析以及综合分析中常见问题,阐述了命题的要点,以及试卷质量综合分析的具体方法。教师应针对考试评价反映出的问题完善教学策略,并根据试卷分析的各项指标进一步提升命题的质量。

本文引用格式

张永爱 , 曹弘毅 , 褚静 , 张海苗 , 牛育鸿 . 护理专业考试命题与试卷分析中的问题及要点解析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(8) : 723 -726 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.011

Abstract

Examination is an important part of education evaluation. It is an important step to strengthen the teaching management process, enhance the curriculum system, promote students’ study, and improve teaching quality. Based on the theory of education statistics and surveying,the paper listed the common problems in setting questions of an examination and examination paper analysis, discussed the main points of setting questions of an examination, and the detailed ways to evaluate the quality of examination paper comprehensively. Teachers should improve the teaching strategies in response to the problems reflected in the examination evaluation, and further improve the quality of setting questions of an examination according to the various indicators of the test paper analysis.

参考文献

[1] 蒋凯. 高等教育增值评价:一种绿色教育评价方式[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2021(2):4-6.
[1] Jiang K. Higher education value-added evaluation:a green education evaluation method[J]. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 2021(2):4-6.
[2] 中共中央 国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL]. [2020-08-04]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm.
[3] 刘新平, 张运良. 教育统计与测评导论[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
[3] Liu XP, Zhang YL. Introduction to education statistics and evaluation[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[4] 魏玉平, 潘虹辉. 双向细目表在学业测评中的应用研究[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2016(4):71-76.
[4] Wei YP, Pan HH. A research on application of two-way checklists in academic evaluation[J]. Forum Contemp Educ, 2016(4):71-76.
[5] 杨志明, 肖新祥. 挑战与应对:取消考试大纲后大规模教育考试命题的测量学考量[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2020(1):3-8.
[5] Yang ZM, Xiao XX. Challenges and countermeasures:psychometric considerations for large scale assessment developments without test specifications[J]. Educ Meas Eval, 2020(1):3-8.
[6] 张林泉. 基于效度理论的试卷质量分析方法[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2010, 26(6):36-37.
[6] Zhang LQ. An analysis method of test paper quality based on validity theory[J]. J Educ Inst Jilin Prov, 2010, 26(6):36-37.
[7] 艾尼瓦尔·斯地克, 张峰, 再米热·阿布都沙拉木. 试卷质量分析浅谈[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2020(34):15-16.
[7] Aniwaer S, Zhang F, Zaimire A. A brief analysis of test paper quality[J]. Educ Teach Forum, 2020(34):15-16.
[8] 廖灯彬, 宁宁. 外科护理学期末考试试卷分析与评价[J]. 护理学杂志, 2009, 24(20):73-75.
[8] Liao DB, Ning N. Analysis and evaluation of the final test paper for surgical nursing[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2009, 24(20):73-75.
文章导航

/