ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
临床实践

产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验

  • 李雯 ,
  • 张艳 ,
  • 杨晓伟 ,
  • 姜文彬 ,
  • 宫慧 ,
  • 吕伯瀚 ,
  • 邹玉姣 ,
  • 魏丽丽
展开
  • 266000 青岛市 青岛大学护理学院(李雯,宫慧,吕伯瀚,邹玉姣);青岛大学附属医院护理部(张艳,姜文彬,魏丽丽);烟台毓璜顶医院产科(杨晓伟)
李雯:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail: 945337035@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-08-06

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-25

基金资助

青岛市民生科技计划项目(19-6-1-55-nsh)

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form

  • Wen LI ,
  • Yan ZHANG ,
  • Xiao-wei YANG ,
  • Wen-bin JIANG ,
  • Hui GONG ,
  • Bo-han Lü ,
  • Yu-jiao ZOU ,
  • Li-li WEI
Expand

Received date: 2020-08-06

  Online published: 2021-03-25

摘要

目的 汉化产妇出院后应对困难量表(Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form),并检验中文版量表的信效度,为我国产妇出院后应对困难情况的评估提供科学的测量工具。方法 对量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适以及预调查,确定中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表的条目,然后对青岛市的200例产妇进行问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。 结果 中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表共保留10个条目,量表水平和条目水平的内容效度指数均为1,探索性因子分析共提取1个公因子,累计方差贡献率达81.627%;中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.974,折半信度为0.968,重测信度为0.971。 结论 中文版产妇出院后应对困难量表具有良好的信度、效度,可用于我国产妇出院后应对困难情况的评价。

本文引用格式

李雯 , 张艳 , 杨晓伟 , 姜文彬 , 宫慧 , 吕伯瀚 , 邹玉姣 , 魏丽丽 . 产妇出院后应对困难量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(3) : 270 -274 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.03.016

Abstract

Objective To translate the Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale-New Mother Form and test its reliability and validity. Methods After translation,back translation,cultural adjustment and preliminary assessment on the scale,the Chinese version of the scale was finalized. Then the questionnaire was distributed to 200 pregnant women in Qingdao to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the scale included 10 items.The scale-level content validity index and the item-level content validity index were both 1. One factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 81.627%. the Chinese version of the scale had a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.974,the half-reliability of 0.968,and the retest reliability of 0.971. Conclusion The Chinese version of the scale has good reliability and validity,and can be applied to evaluate the coping difficulties of Chinese women after discharge.

参考文献

[1] 谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 256-264.
[1] Xie X, Gou WL. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 8th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2013: 256-264.
[2] 孙丽媛, 杜彩素, 苏敏, 等. 社会支持、家庭功能与初产妇产褥期生命质量的关系研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017,33(5):358-361.
[2] Sun LY, Du CS, Su M, et al. Study on the relationship between social support,family function and quality of life of primipara during puerperium[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2017,33(5):358-361.
[3] 宿茹, 潘桃红, 孙艳, 等. 吉林市月嫂行业需求现状调查分析[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2018,39(2):108-109.
[3] Su R, Pan TH, Sun Y, et al. Investigation and analysis on the current situation of the demand of the month wife industry in Jilin city[J]. J Jilin Med Univ, 2018,39(2):108-109.
[4] 黄文娟, 颜艺鹭, 胡蓉芳. 福州市家庭母婴护理员工作现状及培训需求调查[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020,55(1):118-122.
[4] Huang WJ, Yan YL, Hu RF. Investigation on occupational status and training demand of family maternal and infant care providers in Fuzhou[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020,55(1):118-122.
[5] Meky HK, Shaaban MM, Ahmed MR, et al. Prevalence of postpartum depression regarding mode of delivery:a cross-sectional study[J]. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020,33(19):3300-3307.
[6] Martínez-Galiano J, Hernández-Martínez A, Rodríguez-Almagro J, et al. Women’s quality of life at 6 weeks postpartum:influence of the discomfort present in the puerperium[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Heal, 2019,16(2):253.
[7] Opper K, Beiler J, Yakusheva O, et al. Effects of implementing a health team communication redesign on hospital readmissions within 30 days[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2019,16(2):121-130.
[8] Weiss ME, Lokken L. Predictors and outcomes of postpartum mothers’ perceptions of readiness for discharge after birth[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2009,38(4):406-417.
[9] Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[M]. Boston:Allyn and Bacon, 1980: 389-444.
[10] Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, et al. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires[J]. Qual Life Res, 2015,24(1):147-151.
[11] 郭金玉, 李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012,47(3):283-285.
[11] Guo JY, Li Z. The introduction process of scale and its evaluation standards[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2012,47(3):283-285.
[12] 孙振球, 徐勇勇, 梁维君, 等. 医学统计学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 568-576.
[12] Sun ZQ, Xu YY, Liang WJ, et al. Medical statistics[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2015: 568-576.
[13] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018.
[13] Wu ML. Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis:operation and application of SPSS[M]. Chongqing:Publishing House of Chongqing University,2018.
文章导航

/