中青年冠心病PCI术后患者自我管理干预方案的实施及效果评价

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.02.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨基于自我调节常识模型（The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation，CSM）的中青年冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入术（percutaneous coronary intervention，PCI）后患者干预方案的设计、实施方法及效果。方法选取2021年7月—2022年7月收治的中青年PCI术后患者112例作为研究对象，其中2021年7月—2021年12月入院的57例患者为对照组，2022年1月—7月入院的55例患者为试验组。试验组根据CSM在认知阶段、应答阶段、评估阶段、行为及疾病结局阶段对PCI术后患者的自我管理、疾病感知及心理进行干预；对照组采取PCI术后常规护理。比较两组干预前、干预3个月后的自我管理行为、疾病感知、焦虑评分。结果干预3个月后，试验组冠心病自我管理行为得分高于对照组（t=6.221，P<0.001）；疾病感知得分、焦虑得分均低于对照组（t=3.284，6.949；P<0.05）。结论基于CSM的干预可提高中青年冠心病PCI术后患者自我管理能力，降低负性疾病感知及负性情绪，减轻患者身心负担。

关键词: 血管成形术, 气囊, 冠状动脉, 健康教育, 自我护理, 中青年患者, 自我调节常识模型

Abstract:

Objective To construct a self-management intervention program for young and middle-aged patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI） based on the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation，and to evaluate its effectiveness. Methods A total of 112 young and middle-aged postoperative PCI patients were selected as research subjects from July 2021 to July 2022. Fifty-seven patients admitted to the hospital from July 2021 to December 2021 were assigned to the control group and 55 patients admitted from January 2022 to July 2022 were assigned to the experimental group. Patients in the experimental group received self-management intervention. According to the four stages of common-sense model，namely cognitive stage，response stage，evaluation stage，and behavioral and disease outcome stage，personalized health education and psychological care were used to intervene in the self-management，disease perception，and psychology of patients after PCI. Patients in the control group received routine postoperative care. The differences in self-management behavior，disease perception，and anxiety between two groups of patients before and after 3 months of intervention were compared. Results After 3 months of intervention，the self-management behavior score of coronary heart disease in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group（t=6.221，P<0.001）. The disease perception score and anxiety score were lower than those of the control group（t=3.284，6.949；P<0.05）. Conclusion Self-management intervention based on the common-sense model can improve self-management ability of young and middle-aged patients with coronary heart disease after PCI，reduce negative disease perception and negative emotions，and reduce the physical and mental burden of patients.

Key words: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Health Education, Self Care, Young and middle-aged patients, Common-sense model of self-regulation

孙静静, 桑文凤, 贾冠华, 秦娜娜, 王亚欣, 郭鑫田, 王丹. 中青年冠心病PCI术后患者自我管理干预方案的实施及效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(2): 133-139.

SUN Jingjing, SANG Wenfeng, JIA Guanhua, QIN Nana, WANG Yaxin, GUO Xintian, WANG Dan. Implementation and effectiveness evaluation of self-management intervention program for young and middle-aged patients with coronary heart disease after PCI[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024, 21(2): 133-139.

图/表 5

参考文献 16

[1]	《中国心血管健康与疾病报告》编写组. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》概述[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2022, 20(7):577-596.
[2]	Tan P, Xie X, Guo MR, et al. Effects of rehabilitation management on lifestyle and quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention based on behavior change theory[J]. Minerva Surg, 2023, 78(3):261-266.
[3]	Li GX, Tian YH, Zhang QM, et al. The predictive effect of negative psychological emotions of anxiety and depression on the poor prognosis of CHD patients with stent implantation and the improvement of clinical intervention measures[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022, 2022:2534277.
[4]	Xia BY, Yu JM, Wu XY. Illness uncertainty and its associated factors in coronary heart disease patients with heart stent implantation:a cross-sectional study[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2022, 11(7):2410-2421. doi: 10.21037/apm
[5]	Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation(CSM):a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management[J]. J Behav Med, 2016, 39(6):935-946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2 pmid: 27515801
[6]	沈迎, 张瑞岩, 沈卫峰. 稳定性冠心病血运重建策略进展:2018中国稳定性冠心病诊断与治疗指南解读[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2019, 19(2):107-111.
[7]	Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization:executive summary:a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3):e4-e17.
[8]	杨丽霞, 郭瑞威. 《中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)》指导急性冠状动脉综合征的临床实践[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2016, 24(12):714-717.
[9]	任洪艳, 唐萍, 赵庆华. 冠心病自我管理量表的开发和评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2009, 31(11):1087-1090.
	Ren HY, Tang P, Zhao QH. Development and evaluation of a coronary artery disease self-management scale[J]. Acta Acad Med Mil Tert, 2009, 31(11):1087-1090.
[10]	梅雅琪, 李惠萍, 杨娅娟, 等. 中文版疾病感知问卷简化版在女性乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2015, 22(24):11-14.
	Mei YQ, Li HP, Yang YJ, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in patients with breast cancer[J]. J Nurs(China), 2015, 22(24):11-14.
[11]	Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders[J]. Psychosomatics, 1971, 12(6):371-379. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0 pmid: 5172928
[12]	张明园. 精神科评定量表手册[M]. 2版. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1998:35-39.
[13]	房芳, 邓小岚. 自我调节模式联合健康教育在脑卒中恢复期住院患者护理干预中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(10):2212-2215.
[14]	Li YN, Buys N, Ferguson S, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions on health outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease:a meta-analysis[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2021, 11(11):1147-1166. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i11.1147
[15]	尹育华, 张莎莎, 马志会, 等. 延续性健康教育对中青年冠心病患者PCI术后焦虑抑郁情绪及生活质量的影响[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2021, 30(6):671-675.
	Yin YH, Zhang SS, Ma ZH, et al. Influence of continuous health education on anxiety,depression and quality of life in young and middle-aged patients with coronary heart disease after PCI[J]. Chin J Cardiovasc Rehabil Med, 2021, 30(6):671-675.
[16]	Foldes-Busque G, Dionne CE, Turcotte S, et al. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder in patients with coronary artery disease:rationale and design for a longitudinal cohort study[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01848-3