神经系统评估能力量表的汉化及在神经科护士中的信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.03.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化神经系统评估能力量表（Neurological Assessment Competency Scale，NACS）并在神经科护士群体中检验其信效度。方法对原始量表进行汉化及跨文化调试，并选取30名神经科护士进行预调查。2021年8月—12月，采取便利抽样法选取合肥市三级甲等医院神经内外科250名护士作为研究对象，使用中文版NACS进行调查。2周后采用便利抽样法从中选取50名护士进行再次测量；邀请10名专家对中文版量表的内容效度进行评定。并对量表的内部一致性、结构效度、内容效度进行检验。结果探索性因子分析共提取了7项公共因子，33个条目，累计贡献率为86.08%；中文版NACS的S-CVI值为0.918，各条目I-CVI值为0.811~1.000；总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.926；重测信度为0.908。结论中文版神经系统评估能力量表的信度、效度良好，可用于评估神经科临床护士的神经系统评估能力。

关键词: 护士, 护理评估, 问卷调查, 神经系统评估能力, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Neurological Assessment Competency Scale（NACS） among neurology nurses. Methods The original scale was translated into Chinese and adjusted culturally. Afterward，30 neurology nurses were selected for pre experiment. From August to December 2021，250 nurses from the department of neurology and surgery in a grade Ⅲ，class A hospital in Hefei were selected as the participants through convenience sampling to validate the Chinese version of NACS. After two weeks，50 of the participated nurses were recruited again for measurement of the second time. Meanwhile，ten experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the scale. The reliability and validity were evaluated from internal consistency，construct validity，and content validity. Results After exploratory factor analysis，the maximum variance orthogonal rotation method extracted seven common factors，33 items，and the cumulative contribution rate was 86.08%. The S-CVI value of the Chinese version of NACS was 0.918，and the I-CVI value of each entry was 0.811~1.000. The Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.926. The retest reliability was 0.908. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Neurological Assessment Competency Scale are satisfied，which can be used to assess the neurological assessment capacity of clinical front-line neurological nurses.

Key words: Nurses, Nursing Assessment, Questionnaires, Sinicization of neurological assessment ability, Reliability, Validity

王雪琪, 荆晓雷, 徐昊, 庄红霞, 李娟, 刘贤清. 神经系统评估能力量表的汉化及在神经科护士中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 323-327.

WANG Xueqi, JING Xiaolei, XU Hao, ZHUANG Hongxia, LI Juan, LIU Xianqing. Translation and validation of Neurological Assessment Competency Scale in neurology nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(3): 323-327.

图/表 1

参考文献 10

[1]	Chan MF, Mattar I, Taylor BJ. Investigating factors that have an impact on nurses’ performance of patients’ conscious level assessment:a systematic review[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2013, 21(1):31-46. doi: 10.1111/jonm.2013.21.issue-1
[2]	Kirschen MP, Lourie K, Snyder M, et al. Routine neurological assessments by nurses in the pediatric intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Nurse, 2019, 39(3):20-32. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019198 pmid: 31154328
[3]	Ross AJ, Reedy GB, Roots A, et al. Evaluating multisite multiprofessional simulation training for a hyperacute stroke service using the Behaviour Change Wheel[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2015, 15:143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0423-1 pmid: 26330134
[4]	罗银秀, 周玥, 黄叶莉. 专科护士核心能力培养现状及对培养神经疾病专科护士核心能力的启示[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(30):3722-3725.
	Luo YX, Zhou Y, Huang YL. Status quo of core competence cultivation of nurses specialist and its implications for core competence cultivation of nurses specialist in neurological diseases[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2016, 30(30):3722-3725.
[5]	Brunker C, Harris R. How accurate is the AVPU scale in detecting neurological impairment when used by general ward nurses? An evaluation study using simulation and a questionnaire[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2015, 31(2):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.11.003
[6]	Bae KS, Roh YS. Training needs analysis of Korean nurses’ neurological assessment competency[J]. Nurs Health Sci, 2020, 22(1):99-107. doi: 10.1111/nhs.v22.1
[7]	Eisinga R, Grotenhuis MT, Pelzer B. The reliability of a two-item scale:Pearson,Cronbach,or Spearman-Brown?[J]. Int J Public Health, 2013, 58(4):637-642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 pmid: 23089674
[8]	Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis[J]. Am J Appl Math Stat, 2021, 9(1):4-11. doi: 10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
[9]	张晨, 周云仙. 我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
	Zhang C, Zhou YX. Analysis on errors regarding content validity index used in evaluation of measurement tools in Chinese nursing literature[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
[10]	Sharshar T, Citerio G, Andrews PJ, et al. Neurological examination of critically ill patients:a pragmatic approach. Report of an ESICM expert panel[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40(4):484-495. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3214-y pmid: 24522878

[1]	陈湘军, 胡芳, 汤黎, 谭小梅. 临床护士反思性实践水平及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1120-1125.
[2]	陈媛, 吴林静, 喻海燕, 王历刚. 心血管专科护士再评价管理体系的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1126-1131.
[3]	周欣馨, 史岩, 陈勤, 蒋莉莉, 王晶晶. 护理硕士专业学位研究生“双导师制”实施现状及建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 956-961.
[4]	李淑敏, 魏征新, 尚少梅, 侯淑肖. 护理硕士专业学位研究生培养现状及发展建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 962-967.
[5]	姜园园, 曹英娟, 管祥云, 张锦欣, 王美娟, 李黎. 以胜任力为导向的临床护士呼吸治疗培训目标与内容的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 968-975.
[6]	贾淑贤, 李娅, 李琳琳, 张京丽, 赵芹荣, 杨春玲. 心血管内科低年资护士临床急救能力培训方案的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 976-980.
[7]	张紫莹, 丁雯, 王茹, 曾美玲, 潘婷, 蒙浩莹. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者药物素养量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 993-999.
[8]	赵微微, 金玮艺, 朱金荣, 冯春燕, 张洪君, 苏默, 苏春燕. 北京地区血液净化专科护士护理实践现状调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 794-800.
[9]	赵文娟, 张晓菊, 来小彬, 沈志云, 张玉侠. 专职专科护士角色转换期真实工作体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 788-793.
[10]	陶琳, 易银萍, 蒋秋焕, 张红梅, 李黎明, 荆婵, 杜晓宁. 营养支持专科护士临床教学基地建设的探索[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 801-806.
[11]	方蘅英, 周雪玲, 梁骊敏, 蔡有弟, 陈思芸, 李慧娟. 成果导向视角下专科护士培训迁移的探索与实践[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 807-811.
[12]	田君叶, 苏莉, 张嘉晖, 丁炎明, 吴欣娟. 我国专科护士培训20年的发展与思考[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 773-779.
[13]	李春燕, 黄萍, 王晓静, 付逸超, 周田田, 何静静. 急诊急救专科护士培训基地评价指标的构建[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 780-787.
[14]	张学颖, 张晓翠, 尹雪梅, 夏欣华, 王莹, 王蓓, 朱红. 危重症新生儿医源性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 731-737.
[15]	黄玉婷, 张慧琳, 朱婧, 邹颖, 覃祖明, 张晓可. 国内护士对死亡的态度现状及影响因素的系统评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 718-724.