ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   中文科技期刊数据库

中华护理教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 57-61.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.01.010

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系的构建

侯天姣(),杨红军,侯淑肖()   

  1. 100191 北京市 北京大学医学部(侯天姣,侯淑肖);首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院教育处(杨红军)
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 侯淑肖,博士,教授,E-mail:houshuxiao@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:侯天姣,女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:tj_hou@hotmail.com

Construction of a formative evaluation index system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates

HOU Tianjiao(),YANG Hongjun,HOU Shuxiao()   

  • Received:2022-10-08 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-15
  • Contact: Shuxiao HOU

摘要:

目的 制订护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系。 方法 采用文献回顾法构建护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系初稿。采用专家函询法对专家进行2轮函询,最终构建护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系。 结果 构建的护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系包含2个一级指标、8个二级指标、41个三级指标。2轮专家函询的专家积极系数分别为100%(19/19)和95%(18/19);专家权威系数分别为0.83、0.84;肯德尔协调系数分别为0.123和0.209(P<0.05)。2轮专家函询后各级指标变异系数分别为0、0.05~0.16和0~0.16。 结论 本研究中专家函询结果可信度高,构建的护理本科生临床实习形成性评价指标体系科学、可靠,能够为护理本科生临床实习形成性评价提供参考。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 临床实习, 德尔菲法, 形成性评价

Abstract:

Objective The study aimed at establishing a formative assessment system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates. Methods Literature review was used to develop a preliminary formative evaluation index system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates. Two-round expert consultation was conducted among experts to construct the formative evaluation system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates. Results The constructed formative evaluation index system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates included two first-level indicators, eight second-level indicators, and 41 third-level indicators. The recovery rate of questionnaires of the two rounds were 100%(19/19) and 95%(18/19), respectively; the expert authority coefficient were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively;and the Kendall coordination coefficient were 0.123 and 0.209, respectively(P<0.05). The coefficients of variation for each level of indicators after the two rounds of expert consultation were 0, 0.05-0.16, and 0-0.16, respectively. Conclusion The expert consultation results in this study are highly credible, and the constructed formative evaluation index system for clinical practice of nursing undergraduates is scientific and reliable, which can provide reference for the formative evaluation of clinical practice of nursing undergraduates.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Clinical Clerkship, Delphi Method, Formative evaluation