eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus
Overseas Knowledge

Interpretation of guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments(OMIs)——PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

  • Pan YANG ,
  • Aomei SHEN ,
  • Lichuan ZHANG ,
  • Qian LU
Expand

Received date: 2024-11-18

  Online published: 2025-04-16

Abstract

Although there are established methodological guidelines for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments(OMIs),the quality and reporting of these reviews remain inconsistent,therefore,hindering the selection of the most appropriate OMIs. To address this issue,the COSMIN Working Group introduced the PRISMA-COSMIN Reporting Guideline,designed to enhance transparency and consistency in systematic reviews of OMIs. This paper outlines the background and development process of the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines and provides a detailed interpretation of the reporting standards. The aim is to assist domestic researchers in understanding the reporting requirements for systematic evaluations of OMIs and to improve the quality of such reviews continuously.

Cite this article

Pan YANG , Aomei SHEN , Lichuan ZHANG , Qian LU . Interpretation of guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments(OMIs)——PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2025 , 22(4) : 502 -506 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.04.019

References

[1] Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, et al. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments(COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument[J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2016, 20(2):105-113.
[2] Lorente S, Viladrich C, Vives J, et al. Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments:a meta-review[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(8):e036038.
[3] Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments:an international Delphi study[J]. Qual Life Res, 2010, 19(4):539-549.
[4] Prinsen CC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5):1147-1157.
[5] Elsman EBM, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, et al. Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments(OMIs):PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2024, 173:111422.
[6] Elsman EBM, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, et al. Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments(OMIs):PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2024, 22(1):48.
[7] Elsman EBM, Butcher NJ, Mokkink LB, et al. Study protocol for developing,piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline:a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments[J]. Syst Rev, 2022, 11(1):121.
[8] 高亚, 刘明, 杨珂璐, 等. 系统评价报告规范:PRISMA 2020与PRISMA 2009的对比分析与实例解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(5):606-616.
[8] Gao Y, Liu M, Yang KL, et al. Reporting guideline for systematic review:comparative analysis of PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA 2009[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2021, 21(5):606-616.
[9] Maxwell LJ, Beaton DE, Boers M, et al. The evolution of instrument selection for inclusion in core outcome sets at OMERACT:filter 2.2[J]. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 2021, 51(6):1320-1330.
[10] Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis[EB/OL]. [2024-11-12]. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
Outlines

/