Chinese Journal of Nursing Education >
The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire
Objective To translate the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire(MNGQ) into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. Methods After obtaining authorization from the original author,the MNGQ got translated and back-translated according to the Brislin classic model. Following cross-cultural adjustments and a pre-survey, the Chinese version of the MNGQ was formed. From January to March 2023, 492 clinical registered nurses from seven tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Shandong Province were selected as research participants through convenience sampling. They were surveyed using a general information questionnaire and the Chinese version of the MNGQ and thirty nurses were invited for retest two weeks after the first survey to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the MNGQ consisted of six dimensions, namely conflicts between generations,patient safety view, relationships issues between generations, multi-generation teamwork, orientation to change and work propensity,with a total of 45 items. The Cronbach’s α coefficient index of the questionnaire was 0.943, and the test-retest reliability was 0.764. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.80 to 1.00,and the scale-level content validity index was 0.91. Exploratory factor analysis extracted six common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 64.977%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit, with indicator of χ2/df=2.552, RMSEA=0.045, SRMR=0.046, CFI=0.934, TLI=0.929, and IFI=0.934. The average variance extracted(AVE) for each dimension was greater than 0.500,and the composite reliability(CR) values for each dimension were greater than 0.700. The square roots of the AVE for each dimension were greater than the correlation coefficients between that dimension and other dimensions. Conclusion The MNGQ exhibits good reliability and validity, which can be deemed as an important tool for understanding the perspectives and beliefs of nurses from different generations in China for assessing their characteristic differences.
Xiao GAO , Lili WEI , Haiqing ZHOU , Hui GONG , Yaru SUN , Ruting GU . The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2024 , 21(5) : 580 -586 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.05.012
| [1] | 陈玉明, 崔勋. 代际差异理论与代际价值观差异的研究评述[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2014(13):43-48. |
| [1] | Chen YM, Cui X. A review of generational difference theory and generational difference in values[J]. Hum Resour Dev China, 2014(13):43-48. |
| [2] | 孔丹丹. 代际差异视角下工作价值观对离职倾向的影响研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2018. |
| [2] | Kong DD. Study on the impact of work values on the turnover intention from the perspective of generational difference[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2018. |
| [3] | 姜颖雁. 组织中的代际差异研究综述[J]. 现代管理科学, 2018(2):69-71. |
| [4] | 刘凤香. 工作场所代际差异研究述评及整体模型构建[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2010, 32(1):50-57. |
| [5] | 刘凤香. 工作场所中工作价值观代际差异的产生机制和影响因素研究[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2012, 3(3):20-26. |
| [5] | Liu FX. Generating mechanism and influence factors of gene-rational differences of work values in workpalce[J]. J Soc Sci Harbin Norm Univ, 2012, 3(3):20-26. |
| [6] | 陈坚, 连榕. 代际工作价值观发展的研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11):1692-1701. |
| [6] | Chen J, Lian R. A review of the development of generational work value[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2011, 19(11):1692-1701. |
| [7] | Stevanin S, Bressan V, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, et al. The Mul-tidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire:development,reliability,and validity assessments[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2017, 25(4):287-296. |
| [8] | Stevanin S, Mikkonen S, Bressan V, et al. Psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire(MNGQ)[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2019, 75(11):3147-3155. |
| [9] | Stevanin S, Voutilainen A, Bressan V, et al. Nurses’ generational differences related to workplace and leadership in two European countries[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2020, 42(1):14-23. |
| [10] | Sanner-Stiehr E, Stevanin S, Mikkonen S, et al. Job satisfaction and generational nursing characteristics among registered nurses in the United States,Italy and Finland:results of a survey study[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2021, 29(8):2364-2373. |
| [11] | Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970, 1(3):185-216. |
| [12] | 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52. |
| [12] | Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale development[J]. J Cent South Univ Med Sci, 2012, 37(2):49-52. |
| [13] | 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |