eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus
Clinical Practice

Development and validation of a pressure injury risk scale for the home-based disabled elderly

  • Xiaoru WU ,
  • Qiaoyuan YAN
Expand

Received date: 2022-12-26

  Online published: 2023-10-19

Abstract

Objective To develop a scale of pressure injury risk assessment for the home-based disabled elderly and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods Following SHEL model,the item pool of the scale was established through literature review. The first draft of the scale was developed according to Delphi expert consultation. The convenient sampling method was used in collect data from 384 home-based disabled elderly. Statistical analysis was conducted through item analysis,reliability and validity test,subject work characteristic curve and risk classification. The content validity index was calculated according to the correlation score in expert consultation. Results The positive coefficients of experts(n=34) in the two rounds of correspondence were 97% and 100% respectively. The scale of care risk assessment for home-based disabled elderly with pressure injury included 14 items in four dimensions,namely individual characteristics,care environment,care support and appliance employment. Meanwhile,the authority coefficients were 0.86,and the Kendall coefficients were 0.272 and 0.240 respectively. The item-level content validity index was 0.82—1.00,and the scale-level content validity index was 0.94. Exploratory factor extracted four common factors,and the cumulative variance interpretation rate reached 78.900%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitted well. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.825,and retest reliability of the scale was 0.854. The best critical value of the scale was 30 points. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve reached 0.916,where the risk score of 30—33 points for low risk,34—38 points for medium risk,and >38 points for high risk. Conclusion The scale has good reliability and validity,and can be used for the assessment of the risk of pressure injury in the home-based disabled elderly,so as to provide the basis for improving the quality of care and reducing the incidence of stress injure for home-based disabled elderly.

Cite this article

Xiaoru WU , Qiaoyuan YAN . Development and validation of a pressure injury risk scale for the home-based disabled elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023 , 20(10) : 1253 -1260 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.10.017

References

[1] Jiang HX, Xiao SH, Hu HW, et al. Study on the measurement and influencing factors of care service demand of disabled elderly in urban and rural China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(17):11112.
[2] 王巍, 张欣, 李越, 等. 压力性损伤居家老年患者医院-社区-家庭三元联动护理实践[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8):1225-1229.
[2] Wang W, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. The hospital-community-family linkage nursing practice of elderly patients with stress injury at home[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(8):1225-1229.
[3] Lee YN, Kwon DY, Chang SO. Bridging the knowledge gap for pressure injury management in nursing homes[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(3):1400.
[4] 武晓茹, 颜巧元, 刘雪, 等. 居家失能老人照护者压力性损伤风险认知与照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(22):71-74.
[5] Chang SC, Shiu MN, Chen HT, et al. Evaluation of care quality for disabled older patients living at home and in institutions[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2015, 24(23/24):3469-3480.
[6] Anthony D, Papanikolaou P, Parboteeah S, et al. Do risk assess-ment scales for pressure ulcers work?[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2010, 19(4):132-136.
[7] 石晓霞, 陈慧吉, 周霞, 等. SHEL模式在护理安全管理中的应用进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(6):897-900.
[8] Chang AM, Gardner GE, Duffield C, et al. A Delphi study to validate an advanced practice nursing tool[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2010, 66(10):2320-2330.
[9] 张瑞, 常艳, 张晓娜, 等. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽障碍发生现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(23):2898-2904.
[9] Zhang R, Chang Y, Zhang XN, et al. Analysis on the status and influencing factors of dysphagia in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(23):2898-2904.
[10] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011.
[11] Pressure EPUA, Alliance IAPP. Prevention and treatment of pres-sure ulcers/injuries:clinical practice guideline[EB/OL]. (2019-11-15)[2022-08-01]. https://www.epuap.org/pu-guidelines/.
[12] Gillespie BM, Walker RM, Latimer SL, et al. Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults:an abridged Cochrane syste-matic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2021, 120:103976.
[13] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):152-155.
[14] 赵诗雨, 喻姣花, 汪欢, 等. 基于循证构建肠内营养护理质量敏感指标体系[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(3):344-349.
[14] Zhao SY, Yu JH, Wang H, et al. Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators system of enteral nutrition on the basis of evidence-based approach[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(3):344-349.
[15] Yu X, Li C, Gao XQ, et al. Influence of the medication envi-ronment on the unsafe medication behaviour of nurses:a path analysis[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2018, 27(15/16):2993-3000.
[16] 黎丽, 闵悦, 白东梅, 等. 基于SHEL模式的医院感染管理在消化内镜中心的应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(2):286-290.
Outlines

/