eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution：China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor：Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus
Chinese Journal of Nursing Education

Chinese Journal of Nursing Education >

2023 , Vol. 20 >Issue 8: 1014 - 1018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.08.021

Review

Research progress of dyadic symptom evaluation in patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers

  • Wenhai FAN ,
  • Mingming YU
Expand

Received date: 2022-10-31

  Online published: 2023-08-17

Fold

Abstract

The dyadic symptom evaluation refers to the common evaluation from physical，emotional，and cognitive conditions made by patients and their caregivers，which focuses on the consistencies and discrepancies of symptom evaluation between patients and their caregivers. This paper summarized the concepts，related theoretical models，contents and influencing factors of dyadic symptom evaluation. It aims to provide references for development of dyadic symptom management and dyadic intervention programs for patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers.

Key words： Chronic Disease; Signs and Symptoms; Family Caregivers; Dyadic appraisal

Cite this article

Wenhai FAN , Mingming YU . Research progress of dyadic symptom evaluation in patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023 , 20(8) : 1014 -1018 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.08.021

References

[1] GBD Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collabora-tors. Global,regional,and national incidence,prevalence,and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories,1990-2017:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159):1789-1858.
[2] Wajnberg A, Ornstein K, Zhang M, et al. Symptom burden in chronically ill homebound individuals[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2013, 61(1):126-131.
[3] Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, et al. Advancing the science of symptom management[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2001, 33(5):668-676.
[4] de Maria M, Ferro F, Ausili D, et al. Characteristics of dyadic care types among patients living with multiple chronic con-ditions and their informal caregivers[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(12):4768-4781.
[5] Lyons KS, Lee CS. The theory of dyadic illness management[J]. J Fam Nurs, 2018, 24(1):8-28.
[6] Lee CS, Mudd JO, Auld J, et al. Patterns,relevance and predic-tors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2017, 16(7):595-604.
[7] Lee CS, Lyons KS. Patterns,relevance,and predictors of dyadic mental health over time in lung cancer[J]. Psycho-Oncology, 2019, 28(8):1721-1727.
[8] Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes[J]. JAMA, 1995, 273(1):59-65.
[9] Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span[J]. Psychol Bull, 2007, 133(6):920-954.
[10] Bodenmann G. A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples[J]. Swiss J Psychol, 1995, 54(1):34-49.
[11] Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping:a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples:theory and empirical fin-dings[J]. Revue Eur De Psychol Appliquée, 1997, 47(2):137-141.
[12] Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning[M]//Couples coping with stress:emerging perspec-tives on dyadic coping. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2005:33-49.
[13] Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress,appraisal,and coping[M]. New York: Springer, 1984.
[14] Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Bennett JA, et al. Patterns and pre-dictors of symptom incongruence in older couples coping with prostate cancer[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2014, 22(5):1341-1348.
[15] Miller LM, Lyons KS, Bennett JA. Incongruent perceptions of pain and physical function among families living with lung cancer[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2015, 23(9):2755-2762.
[16] Lyons KS, Lee CS, Bennett JA, et al. Symptom incongruence trajectories in lung cancer dyads[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2014, 48(6):1031-1040.
[17] Liu XY, Shen J, Ye ZX, et al. Congruence in symptom assess-ment between hepatocellular carcinoma patients and their primary family caregivers in China[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2013, 21(10):2655-2662.
[18] Quinn C, Dunbar SB, Higgins M. Heart failure symptom asse-ssment and management:can caregivers serve as proxy?[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2010, 25(2):142-148.
[19] Silveira MJ, Given CW, Given B, et al. Patient-caregiver con-cordance in symptom assessment and improvement in outco-mes for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy[J]. Chronic Illn, 2010, 6(1):46-56.
[20] Jensen-Dahm C, Vogel A, Waldorff FB, et al. Discrepancy be-tween self- and proxy-rated pain in Alzheimer’s disease:results from the Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2012, 60(7):1274-1278.
[21] 张乐芸. 脑卒中患者及其配偶照顾者二元疾病评价差异对焦虑抑郁的影响研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021.
[21] Zhang LY. Study on incongruence of dyadic illness appraisals and its effects on anxiety and depression among stroke survivors and their spouse caregivers[D]. Zhengzhou: Zheng-zhou University, 2021.
[22] McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Lobchuk MM, et al. Family caregi-vers’ assessment of symptoms in patients with advanced cancer:concordance with patients and factors affecting accu-racy[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2008, 35(1):70-82.
[23] Klinedinst NJ, Clark PC, Blanton S, et al. Congruence of de-pressive symptom appraisal between persons with stroke and their caregivers[J]. Rehabil Psychol, 2007, 52(2):215-225.
[24] Bonds Johnson K, Bai JB, Waldrop D, et al. Barriers to pain management:incongruence in black cancer caregiving dyads[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2022, 63(5):711-720.
[25] Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, et al. Caregiver burden:a clinical review[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(10):1052-1060.
[26] Larson DG, Chastain RL. Self-concealment:conceptualization,measurement,and health implications[J]. J Soc Clin Psychol, 1990, 9(4):439-455.
[27] Bouldin ED, Aikens JE, Piette JD, et al. Relationship and com-munication characteristics associated with agreement between heart failure patients and their carepartners on patient de-pressive symptoms[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2019, 23(9):1122-1129.
[28] Lyons KS, Johnson SH, Lee CS. The role of symptom apprai-sal,concealment and social support in optimizing dyadic mental health in heart failure[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2021, 25(4):734-741.
[29] Lyons KS, Jones KD, Bennett RM, et al. Couple perceptions of fibromyalgia symptoms:the role of communication[J]. Pain, 2013, 154(11):2417-2426.
[30] Hooker SA, Grigsby ME, Riegel B, et al. The impact of rela-tionship quality on health-related outcomes in heart failure patients and informal family caregivers:an integrative review[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2015, 30(4 Suppl 1):S52-S63.
[31] Vellone E, Chung ML, Alvaro R, et al. The influence of mu-tuality on self-care in heart failure patients and caregivers:a dyadic analysis[J]. J Fam Nurs, 2018, 24(4):563-584.
[32] Bidwell JT, Higgins MK, Reilly CM, et al. Shared heart failure knowledge and self-care outcomes in patient-caregiver dyads[J]. Heart Lung, 2018, 47(1):32-39.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉