eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution：China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor：Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus
Chinese Journal of Nursing Education

Chinese Journal of Nursing Education >

2023 , Vol. 20 >Issue 2: 158 - 163

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.02.005

Simulation Teaching

Design and application of high-simulation situational simulation comprehensive training for pain management

  • Xiaofen RUAN ,
  • Yan FENG ,
  • Jie CHEN ,
  • Bifang Lü ,
  • Xiaoling YU ,
  • Xiaoxu HAN ,
  • Meiqi YAO
Expand

Received date: 2021-12-10

  Online published: 2023-02-20

Fold

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of a comprehensive experimental course of high-simulation situational simulation for pain management among nurses. Methods Following the best practice standards of INACSL，a comprehensive experimental course of high-simulation situational simulation for pain management was developed based on the core competency model. A total of 57 nurses from a tertiary general hospital in Zhejiang Province were selected as participants for this training. The evaluation was carried out using Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Results The average number of correct answers on the questionnaire of pain management knowledge and attitude after training （26.61±2.86） was higher than that before training（21.77±3.19），which reached statistical significant（t=8.741，P<0.001）. Also，the score of critical thinking ability after training（262.88±22.79） was higher than that before training（244.81±34.02），and the difference was significant statistically（t=4.283，P<0.001）. Conclusion The comprehensive training of high-simulation situational simulation for pain management can improve the critical thinking ability and pain management knowledge and attitude of nurses. Meanwhile，the long-term effects and changes in nurses’ pain management practices still need to be further verified.

Key words： Nurses; Pain Management; Inservice Training; Patient Simulation

Cite this article

Xiaofen RUAN , Yan FENG , Jie CHEN , Bifang Lü , Xiaoling YU , Xiaoxu HAN , Meiqi YAO . Design and application of high-simulation situational simulation comprehensive training for pain management[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023 , 20(2) : 158 -163 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.02.005

References

[1] Scholz J, Finnerup NB, Attal N, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11:chronic neuropathic pain[J]. Pain, 2019, 160(1):53-59.
[2] Hayes K, Gordon DB. Delivering quality pain management:the challenge for nurses[J]. AORN J, 2015, 101(3):328-337.
[3] Ferrell BR, Grant M, Ritchey KJ, et al. The pain resource nurse training program:a unique approach to pain management[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1993, 8(8):549-556.
[4] Paice JA, Barnard C, Creamer J, et al. Creating organization change through the pain resource nurse program[J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2006, 32(1),24-31.
[5] 方良玉, 唐碧云, 陈洁, 等. 以病区疼痛护士为主体的疼痛管理实践[J]. 护理与康复, 2018, 17(1):79-83.
[6] Hsu LL, Chang WH, Hsieh SI. The effects of scenario-based simulation course training on nurses’ communication competence and self-efficacy:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Prof Nurs, 2015, 31(1):37-49.
[7] INACSL standards of best practice:SimulationSM simulation design[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2016, 12:S5-S12.
[8] 方雅璇, 李婷, 杨冰香, 等. 《国际护理临床模拟教学协会最佳实践标准:学员评价》解读[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(1):12-17.
[8] Fang YX, Li T, Yang BX, et al. Interpretation of the INACSL Standards of Best Practice:SimulationSM Participant Evaluation[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(1):12-17.
[9] 童莺歌, 田素明. 疼痛护理学[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2017.
[10] 杨冰香, 黄润, 徐爱京, 等. 模拟教学引导性反馈的标准和策略[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(1):18-23.
[10] Yang BX, Huang R, Xu AJ, et al. Standards and strategies of debriefing in simulation[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(1):18-23.
[11] INACSL standards of best practice:SimulationSM debriefing[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2016, 12:S21-S25.
[12] Plaisance L, Logan C. Nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2006, 7(4):167-175.
[13] 童莺歌, 叶志弘. 《疼痛管理知识和态度的调查》问卷的汉化及应用测试研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2010, 26(11):66-68.
[14] American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking:a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi report:research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315-423)[M]. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1990.
[15] Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory,CCTDI scoring supplement[M]. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
[16] 彭美慈, 汪国成, 陈基乐, 等. 批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[16] Peng MC, Wang GC, Chen JL, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[17] McCaffery M, Robinson ES. Your patient is in pain:here’s how you respond[J]. Nursing, 2002, 32(10):36-47.
[18] 童莺歌, 叶志弘. 浙江省4家三级医院护士疼痛管理知识和态度的调查与分析[J]. 护理与康复, 2010, 9(9):747-749,752.
[19] 陈易, 童莺歌, 陈佳佳, 等. 护士疼痛管理知识和态度现况调查与分析[J]. 护理与康复, 2019, 18(1):19-24.
[20] 李小妹. 护理学导论[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006:124-125.
[21] Fishman SM, Young HM, Lucas Arwood E, et al. Core competencies for pain management:results of an interprofessional consensus summit[J]. Pain Med, 2013, 14(7):971-981.
[22] Fishman SM, Young HM. Driving needed change in pain education[J]. Pain Med, 2016, 17(10):1790-1792.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉