Chinese Journal of Nursing Education >
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nursing Professional Practice
Objective To translate the Nursing Professional Practice scale into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The Chinese version was obtained by back translation method,and was reviewed and culturally adjusted by a panel of 6 experts. A total of 674 nurses were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version scale. The reliability and validity of the scale was analyzed. Results The range of I-CVI was from 0.667 to 1 and the S-CVI was 0.964. The exploratory factor analysis showed that three common factors were extracted,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.103%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indicators reached the standard level. The test-retest reliability was 0.737. The internal consistency reliability coefficients were 0.981 for total scale,0.939,0.956 and 0.965 for the 3 factors respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Nursing Professional Practice has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a tool to assess the professional level of nursing practice in nurses.
Key words： Nursing Care; Professional practice; Reliability; Validity; Scale
Min LI , Cai-fu LI . Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nursing Professional Practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021 , 18(9) : 844 -848 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.09.016
| [1] | Ma LJ. Development of a measurement of nursing professional practice[D]. Busan:Pusan National University, 2015. |
| [2] | 汪晖, 胡凯利, 官小莉, 等. 护士专业自主性影响因素的研究现状[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(3):374-378. |
| [2] | Wang H, Hu KL, Guan XL, et al. The current research situation on influencing factors of professional autonomy among nurses[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2017, 17(3):374-378. |
| [3] | Papathanassoglou ED, Karanikola MN, Kalafati M, et al. Professional autonomy,collaboration with physicians,and moral distress among European intensive care nurses[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2012, 21(2):e41-e52. |
| [4] | 朱乐凤, 刘彦慧, 丁慎勇. 专业护理实践环境与一般自我效能感对护士工作满意度的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2011, 46(9):845-848. |
| [4] | Zhu LF, Liu YH, Ding SY. The impact of professional nursing practice environment and general self-efficacy on nurses’ job satisfaction[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2011, 46(9):845-848. |
| [5] | Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials[M]// Triandis HC,Berry JW. Handbook of cross-cul-tural psychology:methodology. Boston,MA:Allyn & Bacon, 1980: 389-444. |
| [6] | 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52. |
| [6] | Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale development[J]. J Central South Univ Med Sci, 2012, 37(2):49-52. |
| [7] | 方积乾. 生存质量测定方法及应用[M]. 北京: 北京医科大学出版社, 2000:53-61. |
| [7] | Fang JQ. Methods and application of quality of life measure-ment[M]. Beijing: Beijing Medical University Press, 2000:53-61. |
| [8] | 郭金玉, 李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [8] | Guo JY, Li Z. The introduction process of scale and its evaluation standards[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [9] | 胡雁. 护理研究[M]. 4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012:110-123. |
| [9] | Hu Y. Nursing research[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2012:110-123. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |