eISSN 2097-6054 ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
Responsible Institution:China Association for Science and Technology
Publishing:Chinese Nursing Journals Publishing House Co.,Ltd.
Sponsor:Chinese Nursing Association
Source journal for Chinese Science Citation Database
China Academic Journals Full-text Database
China Core Journal Alternative Database
Scopus
Exploration and Debate

The interpretation and its use method of a tool of risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions

  • Pei-fen MA ,
  • Ling-ling LI ,
  • Xin-man DOU
Expand

Received date: 2020-07-21

  Online published: 2021-02-07

Abstract

With the development of evidence-based nursing and the wide application of non-randomized interventional studies,nursing researchers need to evaluate the risk of bias and overall quality of the research to improve the quality of evidence. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions(ROBINS-I)is a recommended bias risk assessment tool for non-randomized interventional studies. This article explains the ROBINS-I item by item and demonstratively evaluates the bias risk of two non-randomized studies of nursing intervention to help nursing researchers correctly use the tool and improve the quality of nursing research.

Cite this article

Pei-fen MA , Ling-ling LI , Xin-man DOU . The interpretation and its use method of a tool of risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021 , 18(2) : 187 -192 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.02.019

References

[1] 吴琼芳, 丁泓帆, 邓围, 等. ROBIS:评估系统评价偏倚风险的新工具[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015,15(12):1454-1457.
[1] Wu QF, Ding HF, Deng W, et al. ROBIS:a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews[J]. Chin J Evid-Based Med, 2015,15(12):1454-1457.
[2] Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I:a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions[J]. BMJ, 2016:i4919.
[3] Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2011,343.
[4] Whiting PF. QUADAS-2:a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2011,155(8):529.
[5] 曾宪涛, 包翠萍, 曹世义, 等. Meta分析系列之三:随机对照试验的质量评价工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2012,4(3):183-185.
[5] Zeng XT, Bao CP, Cao SY, et al. Meta-analysis series III:quali-ty assessment tools for randomized controlled trials[J]. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med, 2012,4(3):183-185.
[6] 王浩, 唐晓宇, 王和平, 等. ROBINS-I:评估非随机干预性研究偏倚风险的新工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018,10(7):789-793.
[6] Wang H, Tang XY, Wang HP, et al. ROBINS-I:a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in non-randomized intervention studies[J]. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med, 2018,10(7):789-793.
[7] Iqbal F, Askari A, Adaba F, et al. Factors associated with efficacy of nurse-led bowel training of patients with chronic con-stipation[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015,13(10):1785-1792.
[8] Lee HE, Cho SY, Lee S, et al. Short-term effects of a systematized bladder training program for idiopathic overactive bladder:a prospective study[J]. Int Neurourol J, 2013,17(1):11-17.
[9] Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reaves BC. A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool:for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions(ACROBAT-NRSI),Version1.0.0,24,September2014[EB/OL].(2015-11-28)[2017-06-20]. http://www.riskofbias.info:1-7.
[10] 郝玉芳, 王斗, 晏利姣, 等. 近5年我国护理证据总结类论文的方法学质量分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020,20(4):501-505.
[10] Hao YF, Wang D, Yan LJ, et al. Methodological quality analysis of domestic nursing evidence summary papers in recent five years[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2020,20(4):501-505.
[11] 孙凤, 高乐, 杨智荣, 等. 偏倚风险评估系列:(五)非随机干预性研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2018,39(3):374-381.
[11] Sun F, Gao L, Yang ZR, et al. Series of risk of bias assessment(5):Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions(ROBINS-I)[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2018,39(3):374-381.
Outlines

/