ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
课程·教材·教法

本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案的构建与应用研究

  • 任羽雯 ,
  • 周云仙 ,
  • 王莹
展开
  • 310053 杭州市 浙江中医药大学护理学院
任羽雯,女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:1146979209@qq.com
周云仙,博士,教授,E-mail:yunxianzhou@zcmu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-03-01

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-19

基金资助

浙江中医药大学2022年度校级教育改革项目(ZB22007)

The development and application of a value-added evaluation scheme for Foundational Nursing Laboratory courses on undergraduate level

  • REN Yuwen ,
  • ZHOU Yunxian ,
  • WANG Ying
Expand

Received date: 2025-03-01

  Online published: 2025-09-19

摘要

目的 构建本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案并进行效果评价。方法 通过文献研究、质性访谈和专家会议构建本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案。于2025年2月—5月,选取该校2023级护理专业2个教学班,采取抽签的方式,将其随机分为试验组(n=103)和对照组(n=125),将构建的增值评价方案运用于试验组护理学基础课程实验教学中(除增值评价外,两组护理学基础课程的实验教学方案完全相同),比较两组该学期护理学基础课程的期末技能考试成绩,以及该学期护理学基础课程前后的学业自我效能感和自我导向学习能力水平。结果 构建的本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案包括3个阶段、8个步骤和15个条目。最终试验组中100名学生完成本研究,对照组均完成研究。该学期护理学基础课程结束后,试验组学习能力自我效能感、自我导向学习意识水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 构建的本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案具有科学性和实用性,可促进护理本科生学习能力自我效能感和自我导向学习意识的提升。

本文引用格式

任羽雯 , 周云仙 , 王莹 . 本科生护理学基础课程实验教学增值评价方案的构建与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2025 , 22(9) : 1083 -1090 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2025.09.009

Abstract

Objective To develop a value-added evaluation scheme for Foundational Nursing Laboratory courses for undergraduate nursing students and assess its effects. Methods The value-added evaluation scheme was developed through literature review,qualitative interviews,and expert panel discussions. From February to April 2025,two classes of Grade 2023 cohort nursing students were randomly divided into an experimental group(n=103) and a control group(n=125). The developed scheme was applied to the experimental group’s Foundational Experimental Nursing courses. With the exception of the value-added evaluation,the teaching scheme for the Foundational Nursing courses were identical in both groups. Final skill exam scores,as well as academic self-efficacy and self-directed learning ability levels before and after the course,were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results The developed value-added evaluation scheme the Foundational Nursing Laboratory courses comprised of three stages,eight steps,and 15 items. A total of 100 students from the intervention group and all students from the control group completed the study. After the course,the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher academic self-efficacy in learning ability and self-directed learning awareness compared to the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The developed value-added evaluation scheme for the Foundational Nursing Laboratory courses is scientific and practical,which can enhance nursing students’ self-efficacy in learning ability and self-directed learning awareness.

参考文献

[1] 张华, 孙志岭, 高海霞, 等. 多元建构视角下高等中医药院校护理本科生学业评价体系初步构建[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2015, 32(22):6-9,36.
  Zhang H, Sun ZL, Gao HX, et al. Initial construction of academic evaluation system for nursing undergraduate of advanced Chinese medicine institutions under the perspective of multivariate construction[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2015, 32(22):6-9,36.
[2] 安富海. 学生发展增值评价的“学生立场”及实现路径[J]. 教育发展研究, 2023, 43(10):27-32.
  An FH. The“student position” and implementation path of value added evaluation for student development[J]. Res Educ Dev, 2023, 43(10):27-32.
[3] 汶莎莎, 孙刚成. 增值性评价:促进每一个学生可持续发展[J]. 上海教育科研, 2022(3):70-75.
[4] 曹铭倩. 增值评价在中职护理课程中的应用实践研究[J]. 数据, 2022(9):116-118.
[5] 周继良, 吴肖, 匡永杨. 高校学生学业增值评价:基本属性、现实困境与实践理路[J]. 现代教育管理, 2021(12):9-18.
  Zhou JL, Wu X, Kuang YY. Academic value-added evaluation of college students:basic attributes,realistic dilemmas and practical approaches[J]. Mod Educ Manag, 2021(12):9-18.
[6] Wu XP, Xu TS, Zhou JC. Sustainability of evaluation:the origin and development of value-added evaluation from the global perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(23):15867.
[7] 梁宇颂. 大学生成就目标、归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2000.
  Liang YS. Study on achievement goals,attribution styles and academic self-efficacy of collage students[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2000.
[8] Williamson SN. Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning[J]. Nurse Res, 2007, 14(2):66-83.
[9] 沈王琴, 胡雁. 中文版自我导向学习评定量表的信度与效度[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2011, 46(12):1211-1213.
  Shen WQ, Hu Y. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-rating scale of self-directed learning[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2011, 46(12):1211-1213.
[10] Cornell GR. The value-added approach to the measurement of educational quality[J]. J Prof Nurs, 1985, 1(6):356-363.
[11] Sanders WL. Value-added assessment from student achieve-ment data:opportunities and hurdles create national evalua-tion institute July 21,2000[J]. J Pers Eval Educ, 2000, 14(4):329-339.
[12] 林椿, 肖云南. 高校师生对原始分制与标准分制的感知对比[J]. 大学教育科学, 2017, 8(3):56-62.
  Lin C, Xiao YN. A comparative study of college teachers and students’ perceptions of raw score and Z-score[J]. Univ Educ Sci, 2017, 8(3):56-62.
[13] Pickering JW, Bowers JC. Assessing value-added outcomes assessment[J]. Meas Eval Couns Dev, 1990, 22(4):215-221.
文章导航

/