目的 翻译、修订患者参与文化评估量表（医护版）（The Patient Participation Culture Tool for Healthcare Workers，PaCT-HCW），为从护士角度测评患者参与提供可靠的工具。 方法 根据Brislin翻译模型对PaCT-HCW进行翻译和回译，通过专家咨询和预调查对中文版量表进行文化调试和修订。请7名专家对量表的内容进行评价，选取812名护士进行问卷调查，2周后抽取50名临床护士进行再次调查。 结果 中文版PaCT-HCW包括6个维度（能力、支持、对时间不足的感知、信息共享与对话、对问题的回应、对新角色的接受度），44个条目。探索性因子共提取6个公因子，累计方差贡献率69.829%；量表条目内容效度指数为0.710~1.000，量表层面内容效度指数为0.970。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.962，各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.748~0.956；总量表的重测信度为0.980，各维度的重测信度为0.690~0.977。 结论 中文版PaCT-HCW信效度良好，可作为测评医院病房内患者参与文化水平的工具。

Objective The purpose of this study was to translate and revise Patient Participation Culture Tool for Healthcare Workers（PaCT-HCW） in Chinese background，so as to provide a reliable tool for evaluating the level of patient engagement. Methods The translation and back-translation of PaCT-HCW were followed by the Brislin translation model. The Chinese version was culturally adjusted and refined through expert consultations and pre-investigation. Content validity of the Chinese version was evaluated by seven experts. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 812 nurses. Fifty clinical nurses were selected to investigate again after two weeks. Results The Chinese version of PaCT-HCW consisted of 44 items into six dimensions：competence，support，perceived lack of time，information sharing and dialogue，response to questions，and acceptance of a new role. Exploratory factor analysis revealed six common factors，accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 69.829%. The item content validity index（I-CVI） of the scale rangedfrom 0.710 to 1.000，and average content validity（S-CVI/Ave） reached 0.970. The Cronbach’s α for the whole scale was 0.962，while varied from 0.748 to 0.956 for dimensions. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.980，andranged from 0.690 to 0.977 for dimensions. Conclusion The Chinese version of PaCT-HCW has good reliability and validity，and can be used as a valid tool in evaluating the level of patients’ participation cultural for nurses.