ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
临床教学

吉布斯反思循环在ICU护理本科实习生临床教学中的应用

  • 罗倩 ,
  • 明政 ,
  • 王安素 ,
  • 陈芳 ,
  • 张霞 ,
  • 钟明利
展开
  • 563003 遵义市 遵义医科大学附属医院重症医学科(罗倩,明政,陈芳,张霞,钟明利),脊柱外科(王安素)
罗倩,女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:351157033@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-14

基金资助

遵义医科大学护理学院教育教学改革计划项目(zyhl202107)

The application of Gibbs reflection cycle among nursing undergraduates in their internship in ICU

  • Qian LUO ,
  • Zheng MING ,
  • Ansu WANG ,
  • Fang CHEN ,
  • Xia ZHANG ,
  • Mingli ZHONG
Expand

Received date: 2022-11-11

  Online published: 2023-09-14

摘要

目的 探讨吉布斯反思循环对ICU护理实习生评判性思维能力与自我导向学习能力的干预效果。 方法 采用便利抽样法选取2021年7月—2022年9月在遵义医科大学附属医院ICU实习的150名护理本科生为研究对象,按照入科时间分成试验组(n=75)与对照组(n=75)。对照组采用传统带教模式,试验组在此基础上采取吉布斯反思循环进行临床实践教学干预,为期4周,实习生根据吉布斯反思循环要求完成反思日记,汇报与分享反思结果,整合反思结论。比较干预前后两组的评判性思维能力与自我导向学习能力。 结果 干预后试验组的评判性思维能力得分为(300.33±16.71),对照组为(291.49±11.69),两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.754,P<0.001);干预后试验组自我导向学习能力得分为(151.69±21.95),对照组为(136.99±27.56),两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.614,P<0.001)。 结论 吉布斯反思循环能够在一定程度上提高ICU护理实习生的评判性思维能力及自我导向学习能力。

本文引用格式

罗倩 , 明政 , 王安素 , 陈芳 , 张霞 , 钟明利 . 吉布斯反思循环在ICU护理本科实习生临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023 , 20(9) : 1070 -1076 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.09.009

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of Gibbs reflective cycle on critical thinking ability and self-directed learning ability of nursing undergraduates in their internship in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A convenience sampling method was used with 150 nursing undergraduates who practiced in the ICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from July 2021 to September 2022. The participants were divided into two groups with 75 students in experimental group and 75 students in control group depending on their time of admission. The control group was treated with traditional follower teaching mode,and the experimental group was treated with Gibbs intervention on this basis among four weeks. Participants completed the reflection diary according to Gibbs,reported and shared the reflection results,integrated the reflection conclusions. The scores of critical thinking ability and self-directed learning ability before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention,the score of critical thinking in the experimental group was(300.33±16.71),while that in the control group was(291.49±11.69). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=3.754,P<0.001). After intervention,the score of self-directed learning ability in the experimental group was (151.69±21.95),while that in the control group was(136.99±27.56). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=3.614, P<0.001). Conclusion Gibbs teaching method can improve the critical thinking ability and self-directed learning ability for nursing undergraduates during their clinical internship in ICU.

参考文献

[1] Lee KC, Ho CH, Yu CC, et al. The development of a six-station OSCE for evaluating the clinical competency of the student nurses before graduation:a validity and reliability analysis[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 84:104247.
[2] Alamrani MH, Alammar KA, Alqahtani SS, et al. Comparing the effects of simulation-based and traditional teaching methods on the critical thinking abilities and self-confidence of nursing students[J]. J Nurs Res, 2018, 26(3):152-157.
[3] Forgrave D. Gibbs’s reflective cycle[EB/OL]. [2022-08-26]. https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cycle.
[4] Ardian P, Hariyati RTS, Afifah E. Correlation between implementation case reflection discussion based on the Graham Gibbs Cycle and nurses’ critical thinking skills[J]. Enfermería Clínica, 2019, 29:588-593.
[5] Cronin CJ, Lewes J. Embedding experiential learning in HE sport coaching courses:an action research study[J]. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ, 2016, 18:1-8.
[6] Li YF, Chen WJ, Liu CQ, et al. Nurses’ psychological feelings about the application of Gibbs reflective cycle of adverse events[J]. Am J Nurs Sci, 2020, 9(2):74.
[7] Ahmed AM. From reluctance to addiction:the impact of reflective journals on Qatari undergraduate students’ learning[J]. Reflective Pract, 2020, 21(2):251-270.
[8] 彭美慈, 汪国成, 陈基乐, 等. 批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[8] Peng MC, Wang GC, Chen JL, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[9] Williamson SN. Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning[J]. Nurse Res, 2007, 14(2):66-83.
[10] 沈王琴, 胡雁. 中文版自我导向学习评定量表的信度与效度[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2011, 46(12):1211-1213.
[10] Shen WQ, Hu Y. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-rating scale of self-directed learning[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2011, 46(12):1211-1213.
[11] 杜静, 徐明明, 廖国琼, 等. 护生基于Gibbs反思循环圈撰写实习反思日志的效果[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(24):65-68.
[11] Du J, Xu MM, Liao GQ, et al. Effect of writing practicing reflective journal based on Gibbs reflection cycle in nursing interns[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2021, 36(24):65-68.
[12] Al Moteri MO. Self-directed and lifelong learning:a framework for improving nursing students’ learning skills in the clinical context[J]. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 2019, 16(1):1-10.
文章导航

/