ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
论著

血液透析患者饮食知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验

  • 张园 ,
  • 赵亚娜 ,
  • 张晓宇 ,
  • 朱金荣 ,
  • 门海燕 ,
  • 赵微微 ,
  • 苏春燕
展开
  • 100191 北京市 北京大学第三医院肾内科
张园:女,硕士,E-mail:zyhhxx0928@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-04-21

  网络出版日期: 2023-04-19

基金资助

北京市卫生健康科技成果和适宜技术推广项目(BHTPP202058)

Development and validation of Dietary KAP Questionnaire for hemodialysis patients

  • Yuan ZHANG ,
  • Yana ZHAO ,
  • Xiaoyu ZHANG ,
  • Jinrong ZHU ,
  • Haiyan MEN ,
  • Weiwei ZHAO ,
  • Chunyan SU
Expand

Received date: 2022-04-21

  Online published: 2023-04-19

摘要

目的 编制血液透析患者饮食知信行问卷并进行信效度检验。方法 依据知信行理论,通过文献分析及4名专家焦点访谈,初步拟定问卷条目池;应用德尔菲法对14名专家进行函询,根据专家意见调整问卷内容,形成初稿。采用量表初稿对某医院281例血液透析患者进行调查,进行项目分析、信度检验和探索性因子分析;间隔2周对28例患者进行重测,用数据检验问卷的重测信度。结果 2轮函询问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数为0.936,第2轮函询的条目肯德尔协调系数为0.258(P<0.05)。血液透析患者饮食知信行问卷共包括3个维度,34个条目。问卷总体内容效度为0.79;问卷的Cronbach’s α系数为0.868;重测信度为0.845;探索性因子分析共产生9个因子,其中知识维度4个因子(饮食钾摄入、蛋白质能量摄入、容量控制、饮食磷摄入)、态度维度1个因子、行为维度4个因子(饮食控制、饮食监测、烹饪技巧、选择替代调味品),累计方差贡献率为64.214%,每个条目在各因子上的载荷均>0.4。结论 编制的血液透析患者饮食知信行问卷具有良好的信效度,适用于血液透析患者饮食知信行的评估。

本文引用格式

张园 , 赵亚娜 , 张晓宇 , 朱金荣 , 门海燕 , 赵微微 , 苏春燕 . 血液透析患者饮食知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023 , 20(4) : 409 -414 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.04.004

Abstract

Objective To develop and examine the reliability and validation of Dietary Knowledge-Attitude-Practice(KAP) questionnaire for hemodialysis patients. Methods According to the theory of knowledge,belief and practice,the Questionnaire item pool was preliminarily constructed through literature analysis and focus interviews with four experts. Delphi method was applied with consultation of 14 experts. Then,the content of the questionnaire was adjusted according to the experts’ opinions to form the first draft. A total of 281 hemodialysis patients were investigated through the draft scale,and item analysis,reliability test and exploratory factor analysis were carried out afterward. Among the patients,28 of them were tested again with an interval of two weeks,and the retest reliability of the questionnaire was tested through the data. Results The recovery rate of the two rounds of correspondence questionnaire was 100%,the expert authority coefficient was 0.936,and the Kendall coordination coefficient of the items in the second round of correspondence questionnaire was 0.258(P<0.05). The Dietary KAP Questionnaire for hemodialysis patients included three dimensions of 34 items. The overall content validity of the questionnaire was 0.79. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.868,and the retest reliability was 0.845. A total of nine factors were generated by exploratory factor analysis,among which four factors of knowledge dimension (knowledge related to dietary potassium intake,protein energy intake,volume control,and dietary phosphorus intake),one factor of attitude dimension,and four factors of behavior dimension(dietary control,dietary monitoring,cooking skills,and selection of alternative condiments). The cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.214%. The load of each item on each factor was >0.4. Conclusion The questionnaire holds good reliability and validity,which can be used to evaluate the dietary KAP of hemodialysis patients.

参考文献

[1] Malchesky PS. Renal support:a time to reassess the direction![J]. Artif Organs, 2019, 43(7):615-617.
[2] Jiang N, Fang W, Gu AP, et al. Improving diet recipe and cooking methods attenuates hyperphosphatemia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2015, 25(9):846-852.
[3] Goncalves FA, Santos de Jesus J, Cordeiro L, et al. Hypokalemia and hyperkalemia in patients on peritoneal dialysis:incidence and associated factors[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2020, 52(2):393-398.
[4] Kalantar-Zadeh K, Tortorici AR, Chen JLT, et al. Dietary restrictions in dialysis patients:is there anything left to eat?[J]. Semin Dial, 2015, 28(2):159-168.
[5] 姜丽, 王吉平. 维持性血液透析病人治疗依从性现状与相关影响因素分析[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 31(32):4158-4160.
[5] Jiang L, Wang JP. Analysis of treatment compliance status quo and related influencing factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2017, 31(32):4158-4160.
[6] Ozen N, Cinar FI, Askin D, et al. Nonadherence in hemodialysis patients and related factors:a multicenter study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2019, 27(4):e36.
[7] Snyder RL, Jaar BG, Lea JP, et al. Association of patient-reported difficulty with adherence with achievement of clinical targets among hemodialysis patients[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2020, 14:249-259.
[8] Fung TKF, Ng YL, Lam MF, et al. Psychosocial factors predict nonadherence to PD treatment:a Hong Kong survey[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2017, 37(3):331-337.
[9] 许远. 维持性血液透析患者营养知信行问卷编制及初步应用[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2020.
[9] Xu Y. Development of nutritional knowledge,attitude and behavior questionnaire for maintenance hemodialysis patients and analysis of influencing factors[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2020.
[10] 中国医师协会肾脏内科医师分会, 中国中西医结合学会肾脏疾病专业委员会营养治疗指南专家协作组. 中国慢性肾脏病营养治疗临床实践指南(2021版)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(8):539-559.
[11] Alp Ikizler T, Burrowes JD, Byham-Gray LD, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for nutrition in CKD:2020 update[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 76(3):S1-S107.
[12] Fouque D, Vennegoor M ter Wee P, et al. EBPG guideline on nutrition[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2007, 22(Suppl 2):ii45-ii87.
[13] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 慢性肾脏病患者膳食指导[S/OL]. (2017-08-01). http://www.nhc.gov.cn/ewebeditor/uploadfile/2018/03/20180312095210298.pdf.
[14] 徐蔼婷. 德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J]. 中国统计, 2006(9):57-59.
[15] 德威利斯. 量表编制:理论与应用[M]. 2版. 魏勇刚,龙长权,宋武,译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2004:67-110.
[16] Chang AM, Gardner GE, Duffield C, et al. A Delphi study to validate an advanced practice nursing tool[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2010, 66(10):2320-2330.
[17] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):152-155.
[17] Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale development[J]. J Cent South Univ(Med Sci), 2012, 37(2):152-155.
[18] 方绮雯, 刘振球, 袁黄波, 等. 结构方程模型的构建及AMOS软件实现[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(6):958-960.
[19] 胡慧秀, 王志稳, 李颖堃, 等. 养老机构老年人关怀行为评价量表编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(8):912-916.
[19] Hu HX, Wang ZW, Li YK, et al. The development and psychometric assessment of Elderly Residents-Perceived Caring Behaviors Inventory[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2015, 50(8):912-916.
文章导航

/