ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
院校教育

小规模限制性在线课程联合研讨会教学在高级护理实践课程中的应用

  • 鲜雪梅 ,
  • 乔世娜 ,
  • 赵林芳 ,
  • 胡贝贝 ,
  • 胡宏鸯 ,
  • 袁红娣 ,
  • 钱颖 ,
  • 蒋小芳 ,
  • 叶志弘
展开
  • 310016 杭州市 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院
鲜雪梅:女,硕士,副主任护师,E-mail:<email>xianxuemei@zju.edu.cn</email>

收稿日期: 2022-04-27

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-20

基金资助

浙江大学研究生教育研究课题一般项目(20210403)

Application effect of SPOC combined seminar teaching in Advanced Nursing Practice course for postgraduates of master of nursing specialist

  • Xuemei XIAN ,
  • Shina QIAO ,
  • Linfang ZHAO ,
  • Beibei HU ,
  • Hongyang HU ,
  • Hongdi YUAN ,
  • Ying QIAN ,
  • Xiaofang JIANG ,
  • Zhihong YE
Expand

Received date: 2022-04-27

  Online published: 2023-02-20

摘要

目的 探讨小规模限制性在线课程(small private online course,SPOC)联合研讨会教学在护理硕士专业学位研究生高级护理实践课程中的应用效果。方法 选取某校2020级护理硕士专业学位研究生作为研究对象,按班级分为对照组(n=33)和试验组(n=29)。试验组采用SPOC联合研讨会教学,对照组采用传统教学。分别在课前和课后采用批判性思维能力测量表评价两组的评判性思维能力;比较两组的理论测试和综合报告成绩、教学质量评价和教学满意度。结果 教学后,试验组评判性思维能力得分(300.97±26.45)高于对照组(283.67±17.39),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组综合报告成绩高于对照组(P<0.05),对教学质量的评价高于对照组(P<0.05),在“有助于提高临床问题分析能力”和“有助于提高临床护理能力”2个方面的满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 高级护理实践课程中应用SPOC联合研讨会教学法可以有效提高护理硕士专业学位研究生的评判性思维能力,提高学习效果、教学质量和教学满意度。

本文引用格式

鲜雪梅 , 乔世娜 , 赵林芳 , 胡贝贝 , 胡宏鸯 , 袁红娣 , 钱颖 , 蒋小芳 , 叶志弘 . 小规模限制性在线课程联合研讨会教学在高级护理实践课程中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023 , 20(2) : 169 -173 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.02.007

Abstract

Objective To explore the application effect of SPOC combined seminar teaching in the Advanced Nursing Practice course for postgraduates of master of nursing specialist(MNS). Methods The MNS students were divided into the control group(n=33) and the experimental group(n=29) according to their class. The experimental group employed SPOC combined seminar teaching,while the control group used traditional teaching. The critical thinking ability of the two groups was evaluated by the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory before and after the teaching respectively. Besides,the theoretical test and comprehensive report scores,teaching quality evaluation and teaching satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results After teaching,the critical thinking ability score of the experimental group(300.97±26.45) was higher than that of the control group(283.67±17.39),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Similarly,the score on the comprehensive report and the evaluation of teaching quality of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). In addition,the satisfaction of the experimental group in the two aspects of “helping to improve clinical problem analysis ability” and “helping to improve clinical nursing ability” was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The application of SPOC combined seminar teaching method in Advanced Nursing Practice courses can effectively improve the critical thinking ability among postgraduates of MNS,and enhance the learning effect,teaching quality as well as students’ satisfaction toward teaching.

参考文献

[1] 沈翠珍, 傅婷婷, 章琼芝. 护理学专业学位硕士研究生高级护理实践课程的设计与实践[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2019(4):115-116.
[1] Shen CZ, Fu TT, Zhang QZ. Design and practice of advanced nursing practice course for postgraduates majoring in nursing[J]. China High Med Educ, 2019(4):115-116.
[2] Fox A. From MOOCs to SPOCs[J]. Commun ACM, 2013, 56(12):38-40.
[3] Alario-Hoyos C, Estévez-Ayres I, Delgado Kloos C, et al. From MOOCs to SPOCs… and from SPOCs to flipped classroom[M]//Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017:347-354.
[4] álvarez-Gil MJ, Montes-Sancho MJ, Tachizawa EM. A first approximation to the SPOCs-FC in the context of the Supply Chain Management[J]. Work Pap Oper Manag, 2017, 8:151.
[5] Ruiz-Palmero J, Fernández-Lacorte JM, Sánchez-Rivas E, et al. The implementation of Small Private Online Courses(SPOC) as a new approach to education[J]. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 2020, 17(1):27.
[6] Bouwmeester RA, de Kleijn RA, van Rijen HV. Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation,deeper learning and higher exam scores:a survey study[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2016, 16:200.
[7] Asghar S, Rahman S, Shaikh S, et al. Medical students’ perspective on ‘effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials’[J]. Med Teach, 2021, 43(9):1100-1101.
[8] Spruijt A, Leppink J, Wolfhagen I, et al. Factors influencing seminar learning and academic achievement[J]. J Vet Med Educ, 2015, 42(3):259-270.
[9] 中国研究生招生信息网. 护理硕士专业学位设置方案[EB/OL].(2010-05-13)[2011-10-10]. https://yz.chsi.com.cn/kyzx/zyss/201005/20100513/89393072.html.
[10] 彭美慈, 汪国成, 陈基乐, 等. 批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[10] Peng MC, Wang GC, Chen JL, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2004, 39(9):644-647.
[11] Hussein MH, Ow SH, Cheong LS, et al. A digital game-based learning method to improve students’ critical thinking skills in elementary science[J]. IEEE Access, 7:96309-96318.
[12] Zeng HL, Chen DX, Li Q, et al. Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Med Teach, 2020, 42(12):1343-1349.
[13] Hsia LH, Sung HY. Effects of a mobile technology-supported peer assessment approach on students’ learning motivation and perceptions in a college flipped dance class[J]. Int J Mob Learn Organisation, 2020, 14(1):99.
[14] 宓伟, 石塔拉, 练武, 等. 基于SPOC的混合课程在预防医学教学中的应用效果评价[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2017(11):1131-1135.
[14] Mi W, Shi TL, Lian W, et al. The evaluation of the effect of blending learning mode which is based on SPOC method in preventive medicine teaching[J]. Res Med Educ, 2017(11):1131-1135.
[15] Lou JY, Zheng PR, Jiang C. The enlightenment of SPOC on teaching reform of higher education in China—based on the perspective of mastery learning theory[J]. Sci J Educa, 2016, 4(2):95-100.
文章导航

/